A Scientific Approach to Entrepreneurial Decision Making: Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3249

References

  • Adner R, Levinthal D (2004) What is not a real option: Considering boundaries for the application of real options to business strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 29(1):74–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aspelund A, Berg-Utby T, Skjevdal R (2005) Initial resources’ influence on new venture survival: A longitudinal study of new technology-based firms. Technovation 25(11):1337–1347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Åstebro T (2003) The return to independent invention: Evidence of unrealistic optimism, risk seeking or skewness loving? Econom. J. 113(484):226–239.Google Scholar
  • Barbero JL, Casillas JC, Feldman HD (2011) Managerial capabilities and paths to growth as determinants of high-growth small and medium-sized enterprises. Internat. Small Bus. J. 29(6):671–694.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bennis WG (1962) Toward a “truly” scientific management: The concept of organization health. Indust. Management Rev. 4(1):1–19.Google Scholar
  • Blank S, Dorf B (2012) The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-by-Step Guide for Building a Great Company (K&S Ranch, Pescadero, CA).Google Scholar
  • Blank SG (2006) The Four Steps to the Epiphany: Successful Strategies for Products That Win (K&S Ranch, Pescadero, CA).Google Scholar
  • Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and “explaining” management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. 22(4):1351–1408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Eifert B, Mahajan A, Mckenzie D, Roberts J (2013) Does management matter? Evidence from India. Quart. J. Econom. 128(1):1–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Briner RB, Denyer D, Rousseau DM (2009) Evidence-based management: Concept cleanup time? Acad. Management Perspect. 23(4):19–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown T (2008) Design thinking. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(6):84–92.Google Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, McElheran K (2016) The rapid adoption of data-driven decision-making. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):133–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busenitz LW, Barney JB (1997) Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. J. Bus. Venturing 12(1):9–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark T, Wiesenfeld D (2017) 3 things are holding back your analytics, and technology isn’t one of them. Harvard Bus. Rev. (June 8), https://hbr.org/2017/06/3-things-are-holding-back-your-analytics-and-technology-isnt-one-of-them.Google Scholar
  • Crilly N (2018) “Fixation” and “the pivot”: Balancing persistence with flexibility in design and entrepreneurship. Internat. J. Design Creativity Innovation 6(1–2):52–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drucker PF (1955) Management science and the manager. Management Sci. 1(2):115–126.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dushnitsky G (2010) Entrepreneurial optimism in the market for technological inventions. Organ. Sci. 21(1):150–167.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenmann T, Ries E, Dillard S (2013) Hypothesis-driven entrepreneurship: The Lean Startup. Note 90-812-095, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Fairlie R, Miranda J (2016) Taking the leap: The determinants of entrepreneurs hiring their first employee. NBER Working Paper No. 22428, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Fairlie R, Miranda J (2017) Taking the leap: The determinants of entrepreneurs hiring their first employee. J. Econom. Management Strategy 26(1):3–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Zenger TR (2009) Entrepreneurs as theorists: On the origins of collective beliefs and novel strategies. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 3(2):127–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Zenger TR (2015) Crossroads—Strategy, problems, and a theory for the firm. Organ. Sci. 27(1):222–231.Google Scholar
  • Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Freedman DH (1992) Is management still a science? Harvard Bus. Rev. 70(6):26.Google Scholar
  • Galasso A, Simcoe TS (2011) CEO overconfidence and innovation. Management Sci. 57(8):1469–1484.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gans J, Stern S, Wu J (2017) Foundations of entrepreneurial strategy. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto. Accessed June 24, 2018, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2844843.Google Scholar
  • Gelber A, Isen A, Kessler JB (2016) The effects of youth employment: Evidence from New York City lotteries. NBER Working Paper No. 20810, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Gimmon E, Levie J (2010) Founder’s human capital, external investment, and the survival of new high-technology ventures. Res. Policy 39(9):1214–1226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grandori A (2010) A rational heuristic model of economic decision-making. Rationality Soc. 22(4):1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen BB, Bowers J (2008) Covariate balance in simple, stratified and clustered comparative studies. Statist. Sci. 23(2):219–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayward MLA, Shepherd DA, Griffin D (2006) A hubris theory of entrepreneurship. Management Sci. 52(2):160–172.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hsieh C, Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2007) Opportunity discovery, problem solving and a theory of the entrepreneurial firm. J. Management Stud. 44(7):1255–1277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson WT, Scott DJ, Schwagler N (2015) Using the business model canvas as a methods approach to teaching entrepreneurial finance. J. Entrepreneurship Ed. 18(2):99–112.Google Scholar
  • Kelley T, Littman J (2005) The Ten Faces of Innovation: IDEO’s Strategies for Beating the Devil’s Advocate & Driving Creativity throughout Your Organization (Currency/Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kerr WR, Nanda R, Rhodes-Kropf M (2014) Entrepreneurship as experimentation. J. Econom. Perspect. 28(3):25–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korunka C, Frank H, Lueger M, Mugler J (2003) The entrepreneurial personality in the context of resources, environment, and the startup process—A configurational approach. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 28(1):23–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Y, James B, Madhavan R, Mahoney JT (2007) Real options: Taking stock and looking ahead. Adv. Strategic Management 24:31–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lopez-Vega H, Tell F, Vanhaverbeke W (2016) Where and how to search? Search paths in open innovation. Res. Policy 45(1):125–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin R (2009) The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking Is the Next Competitive Advantage (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • McGrath RG (1997) A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments. Acad. Management Rev. 22(4):974–996.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath RG (1999) Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):13–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath RG, MacMillan IC (1995) Discovery driven planning. Harvard Bus. Rev. 73(4):44–54.Google Scholar
  • McGrath RG, MacMillan IC (2009) Discovery Driven Growth: A Breakthrough Process to Reduce Risk and Seize Opportunity (Harvard Business Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Mitchell RK, Busenitz L, Lant T, McDougall PP, Morse EA, Smith JB (2002) Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition: Rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 27(2):93–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murray F, Tripsas M (2004) The exploratory processes of entrepreneurial firms: The role of purposeful experimentation. Baum J, McGahan A, eds. Business Strategy over the Industry Lifecycle (Emerald Group, Bingley, UK), 45–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nicholls-Nixon C, Cooper A, Woo C (2000) Strategic experimentation: Understanding change and performance in new ventures. J. Bus. Venturing 15(5–6):493–521.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2009) Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers (Alexander Osterwalder & Yves Pigneur, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  • O’Brien JP, Folta TB, Johnson DR (2003) A real options perspective on entrepreneurial entry in the face of uncertainty. Managerial Decision Econom. 24(8):515–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (2006) Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-truths, and Total Nonsense: Profiting from Evidence-Based Management (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ripsas S, Schaper B, Tröger S (2015) A startup cockpit for the proof-of-concept. Faltin G, ed. Handbuch Entrepreneurship (Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, Germany), 1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau DM (2006) Is there such a thing as “evidence-based management”? Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):256–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarasvathy SD (2001) Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad. Management Rev. 26(2):243–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarasvathy SD, Venkataraman S (2011) Entrepreneurship as method: Open questions for an entrepreneurial future. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 35(1):113–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shepherd DA, Haynie JM, McMullen JS (2012) Confirmatory search as a useful heuristic: Testing the veracity of entrepreneurial conjectures. J. Bus. Venturing 27(6):637–651.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shepherd DA, Williams TA, Patzelt H (2014) Thinking about entrepreneurial decision making: Review and research agenda. J. Management 41(1):11–46.Google Scholar
  • Stephan P, Veugelers R, Wang J (2017) Reviewers are blinkered by bibliometrics. Nature 544(7651):411–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sull DN (2004) Disciplined entrepreneurship. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 46(1):71.Google Scholar
  • Venkataraman S, Sarasvathy SD, Dew N, Forster WR (2012) Reflections on the 2010 AMR Decade Award: Whither the promise? Moving forward with entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Acad. Management Rev. 37(1):21–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Hippel E (1986) Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Sci. 32(7):791–805.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zenger TR (2015) Trial and error is no way to make strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (April 24), https://hbr.org/2015/04/trial-and-error-is-no-way-to-make-strategy.Google Scholar
  • Zenger TR (2016) Beyond Competitive Advantage: How to Solve the Puzzle of Sustaining Growth While Creating Value (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.