The Value of Flexibility from Opaque Selling
Published Online:4 Feb 2026https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.02983
References
- (2020) Online resource allocation with limited flexibility. Management Sci. 66(2):642–666.Link, Google Scholar
- (1988) Periodic versus “can-order” policies for coordinated multi-item inventory systems. Management Sci. 34(6):791–796.Link, Google Scholar
- (1964) On a basic class of multi-item inventory problems. Management Sci. 10(2):287–297.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Sparse process flexibility designs: Is the long chain really optimal? Oper. Res. 64(2):416–431.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Retailing with opaque products. Preprint, submitted September 11, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2659211.Google Scholar
- (2021) The power of opaque products in pricing. Management Sci. 67(8):4686–4702.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Probabilistic goods: A creative way of selling products and services. Marketing Sci. 27(4):674–690.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) End-of-horizon load balancing problems: Algorithms and insights. Preprint, submitted June 3, https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.01968.Google Scholar
- (2004) Revenue management of flexible products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 6(4):321–337.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Upfront commitment in online resource allocation with patient customers. Preprint, submitted August 7, https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.03517.Google Scholar
- (1969) Optimal continuous review policies for two product inventory systems with joint setup costs. Management Sci. 15(5):278–283.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Revenue management with strategic customers: Last-minute selling and opaque selling. Management Sci. 56(3):430–448.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Price discrimination with opaque products. J. Revenue Pricing Management 6(2):118–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility. Management Sci. 41(4):577–594.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) Calculating can-order policies for the joint replenishment problem by the compensation approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 141(3):587–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Graphical balanced allocations and the (1 + β)-choice process. Random Structures Algorithms 47(4):760–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) “Balls into Bins”—A Simple and Tight Analysis (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) The power of two random choices: A survey of techniques and results. Handbook of Randomized Computing, vol. 1 (Kluwer Academic, New York), 255–312.Google Scholar
- (2019) Process flexibility for multiperiod production systems. Oper. Res. 67(5):1300–1320.Link, Google Scholar
- (1965) Letter to the editor—Some characteristics of a special joint-order inventory model. Oper. Res. 13(2):319–322.Link, Google Scholar
- (1974) A control system for coordinated inventory replenishment. Internat. J. Production Res. 12(6):647–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Understanding the performance of the long chain and sparse designs in process flexibility. Oper. Res. 60(5):1125–1141.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Leveraging customer flexibility for car-sharing fleet optimization. Transportation Sci. 53(1):42–61.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) On the power of (even a little) resource pooling. Stochastic Systems 2(1):1–66.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Flexible queueing architectures. Oper. Res. 65(5):1398–1413.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) The Bayesian prophet: A low-regret framework for online decision making. Management Sci. 67(3):1368–1391.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Process flexibility: A distribution-free bound on the performance of k-chain. Oper. Res. 63(3):555–571.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) A review of flexible processes and operations. Production Oper. Management 30(6):1804–1824.Google Scholar
- (2014) Evaluating the potential effects from probabilistic selling of similar products. Naval Res. Logist. 61(8):604–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Online demand fulfillment under limited flexibility. Management Sci. 66(10):4667–4685.Link, Google Scholar

