Economies Before Scale: I.T. Strategy and Performance Dynamics of Young U.S. Businesses

References

• Abraham KG, Taylor SK (1996) Firms’ use of outside contractors: Theory and evidence. J. Labor Econom. 14(3):394–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Akcigit U, Alp H, Bloom N, Kerr W (2018) Innovation, reallocation, and growth. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(11):3450–3491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackerberg DA, Caves K, Frazer G (2015) Identification properties of recent production function estimators. Econometrica 83(6):2411–2451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Gort M (1996) The evolution of markets and entry, exit and survival of firms. Rev. Econom. Statist. 78(3):489–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anthony JH, Ramesh K (1992) Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices: A test of the life cycle hypothesis. J. Accounting Econom. 15(2–3):203–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Gu C, Wang H, Wu DJ (2024) Understanding the returns from integrated enterprise systems: The impacts of agile and phased implementation strategies. MISQ 48(2):749–774.Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247(4945):920–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Lee S, Park J (2020) Organizational learning processes and outcomes: Major findings and future research directions. Management Sci. 67(9):5399–5429.Link, Google Scholar
• Arikan AM, Stulz RM (2016) Corporate acquisitions, diversification, and the firm’s life cycle. J. Finance 71(1):139–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor D, Dorn D, Katz LF, Patterson C, Van Reenen J (2020) The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms. Quart. J. Econom. 135(2):645–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan S, Wernerfelt B (1986) Technical change, competition and vertical integration. Strategic Management J. 7(4):347–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Gupta A, Ray G, Singh S (2023) Single-sourcing vs. multisourcing: An empirical analysis of large information technology outsourcing arrangements. Inform. Systems Res. 34(3):1109–1130.Link, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barth E, Davis JC, Freeman RB, McElheran K (2023) Twisting the demand curve: Digitalization and the older workforce. J. Econometrics 233(2):443–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bessen J (2020) Industry concentration and information technology. J. Law Econom. 63(3):531–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 24(1):169–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Pierri N (2018) Cloud computing is helping smaller, newer firms compete. Harvard Bus. Rev. (August 31), https://hbr.org/2018/08/research-cloud-computing-is-helping-smaller-newer-firms-compete.Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2012) Americans do IT better: U.S. multinationals and the productivity miracle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):167–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Floetotto M, Jaimovich N, Saporta‐Eksten I, Terry SJ (2018) Really uncertain business cycles. Econometrica 86(3):1031–1065.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Davis SJ, Foster L, Lucking B, Ohlmacher S, Saporta-Eksten I (2020) Business-level expectations and uncertainty. NBER Working Paper No. 28259, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Brynjolfsson E, Foster L, Jarmin R, Patnaik M, Saporta-Eksten I, Van Reenen J (2019) What drives differences in management practices? Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(5):1648–1683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (2000) GMM estimation with persistent panel data: An application to production functions. Econometric Rev. 19(3):321–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bogin AN, Doerner WM, Larson WD (2019) Local house price paths: Accelerations, declines, and recoveries. J. Real Estate Finance Econom. 58(2):201–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Greenstein S (1996) Technological progress and co-invention in computing and in the uses of computers. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Microeconomics (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC), 1–78.Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):339–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (1995) Information technology as a factor of production: The role of differences among firms. Econom. Innovative New Tech. 3(3–4):183–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2000) Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J. Econom. Perspective 14(4):23–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2003) Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(4):93–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hofmann P, Jordan J (2010) Cloud computing and electricity: Beyond the utility model. Comm. ACM 53(5):32–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Jin W, McElheran K (2021a) The power of prediction: Predictive analytics, workplace complements, and business performance. Bus. Econom. 56(4):217–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Rock D, Syverson C (2021b) The productivity J-curve: How intangibles complement general purpose technologies. Amer. Econom. J. Macroeconom. 13(1):333–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caldarola B, Fontanelli L (2024) Cloud technologies, firm growth, and industry concentration: Evidence from France. Preprint, submitted September 25, https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17035.Google Scholar
• Calvino F, Criscuolo C, Verlhac R (2020) Declining Business Dynamism: Structural and Policy Determinants (OECD Publishing, Paris).Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Gambardella A, Pignataro A (2022) Framing strategic decisions in the digital world. Strategic Management J. 4(2):127–160.Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.Link, Google Scholar
• Chang YB, Gurbaxani V (2012) Information technology outsourcing, knowledge transfer, and firm productivity: An empirical analysis. MIS Quart. 36(4):1043–1063.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang YB, Gurbaxani V, Ravindran K (2017) Information technology outsourcing. MIS Quart. 41(3):959-A3.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chari VV, Hopenhayn H (1991) Vintage human capital, growth, and the diffusion of new technology. J. Political Econom. 99(6):1142–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cusumano M (2010) Cloud computing and SaaS as new computing platforms. Comm. ACM 53(4):27–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cvijanović D (2014) Real estate prices and firm capital structure. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(9):2690–2735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Decker R, Haltiwanger J, Jarmin R, Miranda J (2014) The role of entrepreneurship in U.S. job creation and economic dynamism. J. Econom. Perspective 28(3):3–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Decker R, Haltiwanger J, Jarmin R, Miranda J (2017) Declining dynamism, allocative efficiency, and the productivity slowdown. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):322–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dedrick J, Gurbaxani V, Kraemer KL (2003) Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Comput. Survey 35(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeStefano T, Kneller R, Timmis J (2023) Cloud computing and firm growth. Rev. Econom. Statist. 2023:1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickinson V (2011) Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle. Accounting Rev. 86(6):1969–1994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunne T, Roberts MJ, Samuelson L (1989) The growth and failure of U.S. manufacturing plants. Quart. J. Econom. 104(4):671–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ewens M, Nanda R, Rhodes-Kropf M (2018) Cost of experimentation and the evolution of venture capital. J. Financial Econom. 128(3):422–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, McElheran K (2024) Production chain organization in the digital age: IT use and vertical integration in U.S. manufacturing. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print April 30, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.01586.Link, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2005) How did location affect adoption of the commercial Internet? Global village vs. urban leadership. J. Urban Econom. 58(3):389–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2008) Understanding the inputs into innovation: Do cities substitute for internal firm resources? J. Econom. Management Strategy 17(2):295–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2012) The Internet and local wages: A puzzle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):556–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foster LS, Haltiwanger J, Syverson C (2016) The slow growth of new plants: Learning about demand? Economica 83(329):91–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galdon-Sanchez JE, Gil R, Uriz Uharte G (2022) The value of information in competitive markets: The impact of big data on small and medium enterprises. Preprint, submitted March 18, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4022675.Google Scholar
• Gans J, Stern S, Wu J (2019) Foundations of entrepreneurial strategy. Strategic Management J. 40(5):736–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giandrea MD, Kornfeld RJ, Meyer PB, Powers SG (2021) Alternative Capital Asset Depreciation Rates for U.S. Capital and Multifactor Productivity Measures (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Gort M, Klepper S (1982) Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Econom. J. 92(367):630–653.Google Scholar
• Granger CW (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3):424–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z, Hausman JA (1986) Errors in variables in panel data. J. Econometrics 31(1):93–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Stern S (2020) The state of American entrepreneurship: New estimates of the quantity and quality of entrepreneurship for 32 U.S. States, 1988–2014. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 12(4):212–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haltiwanger J, Jarmin RS, Miranda J (2013) Who creates jobs? Small vs. large vs. young. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(2):347–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA (2003) Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 1(1):51–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han K, Mithas S (2013) Information technology outsourcing and non-IT operating costs: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 37(1):315–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han K, Kauffman RJ, Nault BR (2011) Returns to information technology outsourcing. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):824–840.Link, Google Scholar
• Handley SM (2017) How governance misalignment and outsourcing capability impact performance. Production Oper. Management 26(1):134–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hasan MM, Cheung A (2018) Organization capital and firm life cycle. J. Corporate Finance 48:556–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2003) The dynamic resource‐based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management J. 24(10):997–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Impink SM (2022) Both sides of cloud: More standardized tools and more diverse data analytics. Preprint, submitted September 6, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4200675.Google Scholar
• Jensen JB, McGuckin RH, Stiroh KJ (2001) The impact of vintage and survival on productivity: Evidence from cohorts of US manufacturing plants. Rev. Econom. Statist. 83(2):323–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B (1982) Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica 50(3):649–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Nanda R (2009) Democratizing entry: Banking deregulations, financing constraints, and entrepreneurship. J. Financial Econom. 94(1):124–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Nanda R, Rhodes-Kropf M (2014) Entrepreneurship as experimentation. J. Econom. Perspective 28(3):25–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keyhani M (2022) Startup stacks: Understanding the new landscape of digital entrepreneurship technology. Handbook of Digital Entrepreneurship (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 140.Google Scholar
• Knittel C, Stango V (2007) The productivity benefits of IT outsourcing. Working paper, University of California Davis.Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Kotlarsky J, Oshri I, Dibbern J, Mani D (2018) MISQ Research Curation on IS Sourcing (July), https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jens-Dibbern/publication/329092682_MISQ_Research_Curation_on_IS_Sourcing/links/5bf53a0792851c6b27cefae9/MISQ-Resear ch-Curation-on-IS-Sourcing.pdf.Google Scholar
• Kueng L, Yang M-J, Hong B (2014) Sources of firm life-cycle dynamics: Size vs. age effects. NBER Working Paper No. 20621, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kuppuswamy V, Villalonga B (2016) Does diversification create value in the presence of external financing constraints? Evidence from the 2007–2009 financial crisis. Management Sci. 62(4):905–923.Link, Google Scholar
• Lashkari D, Bauer A, Boussard J (2024) Information technology and returns to scale. Amer. Econom. Rev. 224(6):1769–1815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lester DL, Parnell JA, Carraher S (2003) Organizational life cycle: A five‐stage empirical scale. Internat. J. Organ. Anal. 11(4):339–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Ross JW (2003) From the vendor’s perspective: Exploring the value proposition in information technology outsourcing. MIS Quart. 27(3):331–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinsohn J, Petrin A (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(2):317–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mata FJ, Fuerst WL, Barney JB (1995) Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quart. 19(4):487–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ, Nickerson J (2005) Antecedents and performance implications of contracting for knowledge workers: Evidence from information technology services. Organ. Sci. 16(3):225–242.Link, Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ, Salomon R (2006) Capabilities, contractual hazards, and governance: Integrating resource-based and transaction cost perspectives. Acad. Management J. 49(5):942–959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McElheran K (2014) Delegation in multi‐establishment Firms: Evidence from IT purchasing. J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(2):225–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McElheran K (2015) Do market leaders lead in business process innovation? The case(s) of e-business adoption. Management Sci. 61(6):1197–1216.Link, Google Scholar
• McElheran K, Brynjolfsson E, Yang MJ (2024) Data in action: Data-driven decision making in U.S. manufacturing. Working paper, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
• Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2004) Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quart. 28(2):283–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Tafti A, Mitchell W (2013) How a firm’s competitive environment and digital strategic posture influence digital business strategy. MIS Quart. 37(2):511–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger T (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm: The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Novak S, Stern S (2008) How does outsourcing affect performance dynamics? Evidence from the automobile industry. Management Sci. 54(12):1963–1979.Link, Google Scholar
• Olley G, Pakes A (1996) The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64(6):1263–1297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmer M (2012) Cloud computing cuts start-up costs. Financial Times (February 29), https://www.ft.com/content/fc871bca-58e1-11e1-b9c6-00144feabdc0.Google Scholar
• Paraskevopoulos D, Karakitsos E, Rustem B (1991) Robust capacity planning under uncertainty. Management Sci. 37(7):787–800.Link, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zenger T (1998) Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge‐based, and measurement explanations for make‐or‐buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management J. 19(9):853–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Quinn JB, Hilmer FG (1994) Strategic outsourcing. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 35(4):43.Google Scholar
• Saunders A, Brynjolfsson E (2016) Valuing IT-related intangible assets. MIS Quart. 40(1):83–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence AM (1977) Nonprice competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 67(1):255–259.Google Scholar
• Spence AM (1979) Investment strategy and growth in a new market. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence AM (1981) The learning curve and competition. Bell J. Econom. 12(1):49–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staten J (2008) Is cloud computing ready for the enterprise? Forrester Research Report (March 7), https://www.forrester.com/report/Is+Cloud+Computing+Ready+For+The+Enterprise/-/E-RES44229#.Google Scholar
• Street CT, Meister DB (2004) Small business growth and internal transparency: The role of information systems. MIS Quart. 28(3):473–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sunyaev A (2020) Cloud computing. Internet Computing (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Susarla A, Barua A (2011) Contracting efficiency and new firm survival in markets enabled by information technology. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):306–324.Google Scholar
• Syverson C (2011) What determines productivity? J. Econom. Literature 49(2):326–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tambe P (2014) Big data investment, skills, and firm value. Management Sci. 60(6):1452–1469.Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt LM (2012) The productivity of information technology investments: New evidence from IT labor data. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3-part-1):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt L, Rock D, Brynjolfsson E (2020) Digital capital and superstar firms. NBER Working Paper No. 28285, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics (2021) Accessed on November 1, 2023, https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/time-series/econ/bds/bds-datasets.html.Google Scholar
• Van Reenen J, Bloom N, Brynjolfsson E, Saporta-Eksten I, Foster L, Patnaik M, Jarmin R (2014) IT and Management in America (No. 9886). CEPR Discussion papers, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 5(2):171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1985) The dynamics of prices and market shares over the product life cycle. Management Sci. 31(8):928–939.Link, Google Scholar
• Willcocks LP, Lacity MC, eds. (2016) The New IT Outsourcing Landscape: From Innovation to Cloud Services (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1989) Transaction Cost Economics. Handbook of Industrial Organization (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zolas N, Kroff Z, Brynjolfsson E, McElheran K, Beede DN, Buffington C, Goldschlag N, et al. (2020) Advanced technologies adoption and use by U.S. firms: Evidence from the annual business survey. NBER Working Paper No. 28290, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar