The Economic Consequences of Audit Firms’ Quality Control System Deficiencies

References

• Abbott LJ, Gunny KA, Zhang TC (2013) When the PCAOB talks, who listens? Evidence from stakeholder reaction to GAAP-deficient PCAOB inspection reports of small auditors. Auditing 32(2):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acito A, Hogan CE, Mergenthaler RD (2018) The effects of PCAOB inspections on auditor-client relationships. Accounting Rev. 93(2):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aobdia D (2018) The impact of the PCAOB individual engagement inspection process—Preliminary evidence. Accounting Rev. 93(4):53–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aobdia D (2019) Do practitioner assessments agree with academic proxies for audit quality? Evidence from PCAOB and internal inspections. J. Accounting Econom., 67(1):144–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aobdia D, Shroff N (2017) Regulatory oversight and auditor market share. J. Accounting Econom. 63(2–3):262–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audousset-Coulier S, Jeny A, Jiang L (2016) The validity of auditor industry specialization measures. Auditing 35(1):139–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk L, Cohen A, Ferrell A (2009) What matters in corporate governance? Rev. Financial Stud. 22(2):783–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown K, Dugan IJ (2002) Arthur Andersen’s fall from grace is a sad tale of greed and miscues. Wall Street Journal (June 7), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1023409436545200.Google Scholar
• Chung H, Kallapur S (2003) Client importance, nonaudit services, and abnormal accruals. Accounting Rev. 78(4):931–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cushing B, Loebbecke J (1986) Comparison of Audit Methodologies of Large Accounting Firms (American Accounting Association, Lakewood Ranch, FL).Google Scholar
• DeAngelo L (1981) Auditor size and audit quality. J. Accounting Econom. 3(3):183–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeFond ML, Lennox CS (2017) Do PCAOB inspections improve the quality of internal control audits? J. Accounting Res. 55(3):591–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeFond ML, Zhang J (2014) A review of archival auditing research. J. Accounting Econom. 58(2–3):275–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doyle JT, Ge W, McVay S (2007) Accruals quality and internal control over financial reporting. Accounting Rev. 82(2):1141–1170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drake KD, Goldman N, Lusch SJ (2016) Do income tax related deficiencies in publicly disclosed PCAOB Part II reports influence audit client financial reporting of income tax accounts? Accounting Rev. 91(5):1411–1439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duhnke WD (2018) PCAOB transitions for the future. Prepared remarks, 2018 Deloitte/University of Kansas Auditing Symposium, May 17, University of Kansas, Lawrence. https://pcaobus.org/News/Speech/Pages/PCAOB-Transition.aspx.Google Scholar
• Dye RA (1993) Auditing standards, legal liability, and auditor wealth. J. Political Econom. 101(5):887–914.Google Scholar
• Eichenwald K, Norris F (2002) Early verdict on audit: Procedures ignored. New York Times (June 6), https://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/06/business/early-verdict-on-audit-procedures-ignored.html.Google Scholar
• Evans RJ, Boster RS, Gradison B (2011) Increasing transparency: A prototype of the nonpublic portions of PCAOB large-firm inspection reports. Current Issues Auditing 5(1):A1–A21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiolleau K, Hoang K, Jamal K, Sunder S (2013) How do regulatory reforms to enhance auditor independence work in practice? Contemporary Accounting Res. 30(3):864–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Francis JR, Reichelt K, Wang D (2005) The pricing of national and city-specific reputations for industry expertise in the U.S. audit market. Accounting Rev. 80(1):113–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Francis JR, Yu M (2009) The effect of Big 4 office size on audit quality. Accounting Rev. 84(5):1521–1552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Francis JR (2011) A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing 30(2):125–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franzel JM (2016) Progress and evolution in audit oversight to protect investors and the public interest. Speech, Robert Zicklin Center for Corporate Integrity 15th Annual Financial Reporting Conference, May 5, Baruch College, New York. https://pcaobus.org/News/Speech/Pages/Franzel-progress-in-audit-oversight-Baruch-5-5-16.aspx.Google Scholar
• Fung SYK, Raman KK, Zhu XK (2017) Does the PCAOB’s international inspection program improve audit quality for non US-listed foreign clients? J. Accounting Econom. 64(1):15–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garmaise MJ (2011) Ties that truly bind: Noncompetition agreements, executive compensation, and firm investment. J. Law Econom. Organ. 27(2):376–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gendron Y, Spira LF (2009) What went wrong? The downfall of Arthur Andersen and the construction of controllability boundaries surrounding financial auditing. Contemporary Accounting Res. 26(4):987–1027.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gipper B, Leuz C, Maffett M (2016) Public audit oversight and reporting credibility: Evidence from the PCAOB inspection regime. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2015) The value of corporate culture. J. Financial Econom. 117(1):60–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunny KA, Zhang TC (2013) PCAOB inspection reports and audit quality. J. Accounting Public Policy 32(2):136–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gompers P, Ishii J, Metrick A (2003) Corporate governance and equity prices. Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):107–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanson JD (2012) Reflections on the state of the audit profession. Speech, American Accounting Association, Auditing Section, Midyear Meeting, January 23, American Accounting Association, Lakewood Ranch, FL. http://pcaobus.org/News/Speech/Pages/01132012_HansonAAA.aspx.Google Scholar
• Harris SB (2015) Audit quality, firm independence, and the firm business model. Speech, 2015 International Institute on Audit Regulation, December 2, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Washington, DC. https://pcaobus.org/News/Speech/Pages/Harris-2015-International-Institute.aspx.Google Scholar
• Hogan CE, Martin RD (2009) Risk shifts in the market for audits: An examination of changes in risk for “second tier” audit firms. Auditing 28(2):93–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):324–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huddart S, Liang PJ (2003) Accounting in partnerships. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(2):410–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huddart S, Liang PJ (2005) Profit sharing and monitoring in partnerships. J. Accounting Econom. 40(1–3):153–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jenkins JG, Reis DR, Bedard JC, Curtis MB (2008) Accounting firm culture and governance: A research synthesis. Behav. Res. Accounting 20(1):45–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnstone KM, Bedard JC (2003) Risk management in client acceptance decisions. Accounting Rev. 78(4):1003–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnstone KM, Bedard JC (2004) Audit firm portfolio management decisions. J. Accounting Res. 42(4):659–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kandel E, Lazear EP (1992) Peer pressure and partnerships. J. Political Econom. 100(4):801–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kinney W (1986) Audit technology and preferences for auditing standards. J. Accounting Econom. 8:73–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreps D (1990) Corporate culture and economic theory. Alt JE, Shepsle KA, eds. Perspectives on Positive Political Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 93–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (1998) Law and finance. J. Political Econom. 106(6):1113–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lennox C (2016) Did the PCAOB’s restrictions on auditors’ tax services improve audit quality? Accounting Rev. 91(6):1493–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lennox C, Pittman J (2010) Auditing the auditors: Evidence on the recent reforms to the external monitoring of audit firms. J. Accounting Econom. 49(1–2):84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lennox C, Wu X (2018) A review of the archival literature on audit partners. Accounting Horizons 32(2):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lisic LL, Myers LA, Pawlewicz RJ, Seidel TA (2018) Do accounting firm consulting revenues affect audit quality? Evidence from the pre- and post- SOX areas. Contemporary Accounting Res., ePub ahead of print June 12, https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12424.Google Scholar
• Liu X, Simunic DA (2005) Profit sharing in an auditing oligopoly. Accounting Rev. 80(2):677–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone CF, Roberts RW (1996) Factors associated with the incidence of reduced audit quality behaviors. Auditing 15(2):49–64.Google Scholar
• Minutti-Meza M (2013) Does auditor industry specialization improve audit quality? J. Accounting Res. 51(4):779–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Missal MJ (2008) Final report of Michael J. Missal bankruptcy court examiner. Case 07-10416, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District Delaware, Wilmington. http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/business/Final_Report_New_Century.pdf.Google Scholar
• Morris MH, Nichols WD (1988) Consistency exceptions: Materiality judgments and audit firm structure. Accounting Rev. 63(2):237–254.Google Scholar
• Mowchan M (2016) Do office managing partners influence audit quality? Working paper, Arizona State University, Phoenix.Google Scholar
• Nagy AL (2014) PCAOB quality control inspection reports and auditor reputation. Auditing 33(3):87–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newquist C (2010) KPMG resolves lawsuit with New Century. GoingConcern.com (June 30), http://goingconcern.com/kpmg-resolves-lawsuit-with-new-century/.Google Scholar
• O’Reilly C (1989) Corporations, culture and commitment: motivation and social control in organizations. Calif. Management Rev. 31(4):9–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Otley D, Pierce B (1996) The operation of control systems in large audit firms. Auditing 15(2):65–84.Google Scholar
• Palmrose Z-V (2006) Maintaining the value and viability of independent auditors as gatekeepers under SOX: An auditing master proposal. Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) (2004) Report on 2003 limited inspection of Deloitte & Touche LLP. PCAOB Release 104-2004-002, PCAOB, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) (2005) Report on 2004 inspection of Deloitte & Touche LLP. PCAOB Release 104-2005-089, PCAOB, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) (2006a) Report on 2004 inspection of Grant Thornton LLP. PCAOB Release 104-2006-002, PCAOB, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) (2006b) The process for Board determinations regarding firms’ efforts to address quality control criticisms in inspections reports. PCAOB Release 104-2006-077, PCAOB, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) (2008) Report on 2007 Inspection of Deloitte & Touche LLP. PCAOB Release 104-2008-070A, PCAOB, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) (2011) Report on 2010 Inspection of Deloitte & Touche LLP. PCAOB Release 104-2011-290, PCAOB, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) (2012) Information for audit committees about the PCAOB inspection process. PCAOB Release No. 2012-003, PCAOB, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) (2015a) Report on 2012 inspection of BDO USA, LLP. PCAOB Release 104-2013-265A., PCAOB, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) (2015b) Report on 2014 inspection of Deloitte & Touche LLP. PCAOB Release 104-2015-095, PCAOB, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Public Oversight Board (POB) (2000) The Panel on Audit Effectiveness: Report and Recommendations (Public Oversight Board, Stamford, CT).Google Scholar
• Reichelt K, Wang D (2010) National and office-specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. J. Accounting Res. 48(3):647–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shroff N (2017) Does auditor regulatory oversight affect corporate financing and investment decisions? Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Stigler G (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. 2(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toffler B, Reingold J (2003) Final Accounting: Ambition, Greed, and the Fall of Arthur Andersen (Broadway Books, New York).Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice (2005) KPMG to pay $456 million for criminal violations in relation to largest-ever tax shelter fraud case. Press release (August 29), U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC. https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/2005/August/05_ag_433.html.Google Scholar
• U.S. General Accounting Office (2003) Public accounting firms: Mandated study on consolidation and competition. Report to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and the House Committee on Financial Services, GAO-03-864, U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2006) Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Consideration of key principles needed in addressing implementation for smaller public companies. Report to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, U.S. Senate, GAO-06-361, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• U.S. Senate (2005) The role of professional firms in the U.S. tax shelter industry. Report prepared by the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee of Homeland Security and Government Affairs, 109th Congress, 1st session, April 13, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Velikonja U (2016) Reporting agency performance: Behind the SEC’s enforcement statistics. Cornell Law Rev. 101(4):901–980.Google Scholar
• Williams DD, Dirsmith MW (1988) The effects of audit technology on auditor efficiency: Auditing and the timeliness of client earnings announcements. Accounting Organ. Soc. 13(5):487–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wyatt AR (2004) Accounting professionalism—They just don’t get it! Accounting Horizons 18(1):45–53.Crossref, Google Scholar