Auditors’ Liability to Lenders and Auditor Conservatism

References

• Antle R, Lambert RA (1988) Accountants’ loss functions and induced preferences for conservatism. Feltham GA, Amershi AH, Ziemba WT, eds. Economic Analysis of Information and Contracts: Essays in Honor of John. E. Butterworth (Kluwer, Boston), 373–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antle R, Nalebuff B (1991) Conservatism and auditor-client negotiations. J. Accounting Res. 29(Supplement):31–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker T, Griffith SJ (2010) Ensuring Corporate Misconduct: How Liability Insurance Undermines Shareholder Litigation (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ball R, Shivakumar L (2005) Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. J. Accounting Econom. 39(1):83–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bush T, Fearnley S, Sunder S (2007) Auditor liability reforms in the UK and the US: A comparative review. Working paper, Hermes Pensions Management Ltd., London.Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Hemmer T, Zhang Y (2007) On the relation between conservatism in accounting standards and incentives for earnings management. J. Accounting Res. 45(3):541–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung J, Farrar J, Puri P, Thorne L (2010) Auditor liability to third parties after Sarbanes-Oxley: An international comparison of regulatory and legal reforms. J. Internat. Accounting Auditing Taxation 19(1):66–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donelson DC, Hopkins JJ (2016) Large market declines and securities litigation: Implications for disclosing adverse earnings news. Management Sci. 62(11):3183–3198.Link, Google Scholar
• Gigler F, Kanodia C, Sapra H, Venugopalan R (2009) Accounting conservatism and the efficiency of debt contacts. J. Accounting Res. 47(3):767–797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glover J, Lin H (2018) Accounting conservatism and incentives: Intertemporal considerations. Accounting Rev. 93(6):181–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kronenberger S, Laux V (2018) On the litigation explanation for conservatism. Working paper, University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.Google Scholar
• Kwon YK, Newman DP, Suh YS (2001) The demand for accounting conservatism for management control. Rev. Accounting Stud. 6(1):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liao P, Radhakrishnan S (2016) The effects of the auditor’s insurance role on reporting conservatism and audit quality. Accounting Rev. 91(2):587–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu T (2006) Does opinion shopping impair auditor independence and audit quality? J. Accounting Res. 44(3):561–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu T, Sapra H (2009) Auditor conservatism and investment efficiency. Accounting Rev. 84(6):1933–1958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu T, Sivaramakrishnan K (2009) Mandatory audit firm rotation: Fresh look vs. poor knowledge. J. Accounting Public Policy 28(2):71–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan VG (1994) An analysis of auditor liability rules. J. Accounting Res. 32(Supplement):39–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pacini C, Hillison W, Sinason D (2000a) Auditor liability to third parties: An international focus. Managerial Auditing J. 15(8):394–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pacini C, Martin MJ, Hamilton L (2000b) At the interface of law and accounting: An examination of a trend toward a reduction in the scope of auditor liability to third parties in the common law countries. Amer. Bus. Law J. 37(2):171–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan S (1999) Equityholders’ recovery friction and auditor liability rules. Accounting Rev. 74(2):225–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherl JB (1994) Evolution of auditor liability to noncontractual third parties: Balancing the equities and weighing the consequences. Amer. Univ. Law Rev. 44(1):255–289.Google Scholar
• Schwartz R (1997) Legal regimes, audit quality and investment. Accounting Rev. 72(3):385–406.Google Scholar
• Schwartz R (1998) Auditors’ liability, vague due care, and auditing standards. Rev. Quant. Finance Accounting 11(2):183–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sterna S (2013) Defending third-party audit claims. J. Accountancy (May 1), http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2013/may/20137570.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Trakman L, Trainor J (2005) The rights and responsibilities of auditors to third parties: A call for a principled approach. Queens Law J. 31(1):148–205.Google Scholar
• Watts RL (2003) Conservatism in accounting—Part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons 17(3):207–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wittenberg-Moerman R (2008) The role of information asymmetry and financial reporting quality in debt trading: Evidence from the secondary loan market. J. Accounting Econom. 46(2–3):240–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2008) The contracting benefits of accounting conservatism to lenders and borrowers. J. Accounting Econom. 45(1):27–54.Crossref, Google Scholar