Teamwork and Individual Productivity

References

• Aczél J (2006) Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications (Dover, Mineola, NY).Google Scholar
• Adams WJ, Yellen JL (1976) Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quart. J. Econom. 90(3):475–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen L, Scott J, Brand A, Hlava M, Altman M (2014) Publishing: Credit where credit is due. Nature 508(7496):312–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman A, Tennenholtz M (2005) Ranking systems: The PageRank axioms. Proc. 6th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Sally D (2013) The Numbers Game: Why Everything You Know About Soccer Is Wrong (Penguin Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Bergantiños G, Moreno-Ternero JD (2015) The axiomatic approach to the problem of sharing the revenue from museum passes. Games Econom. Behav. 89(January):78–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergantiños G, Moreno-Ternero JD (2019) Sharing the revenues from broadcasting sport events. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print May 2, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3313.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikard M, Murray F, Gans JS (2015) Exploring trade-offs in the organization of scientific work: Collaboration and scientific reward. Management Sci. 61(7):1473–1495.Link, Google Scholar
• Bonacich P (1972) Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. J. Math. Sociol. 2(1):113–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Guinan EC, Lakhani KR, Riedl C (2016) Looking across and looking beyond the knowledge frontier: Intellectual distance, novelty, and resource allocation in science. Management Sci. 62(10):2765–2783.Link, Google Scholar
• Card D, DellaVigna S (2013) Nine facts about top journals in economics. J. Econom. Literature 51(1):144–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chambers CP, Miller AD (2014) Scholarly influence. J. Econom. Theory 151(May):571–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demange G (2014) A ranking method based on handicaps. Theoret. Econom. 9(3):915–942.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dequiedt V, Zenou Y (2017) Local and consistent centrality measures in parameterized networks. Math. Soc. Sci. 88(July):28–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Egghe L (2006) Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics 69(1):131–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G (2013) How does the market use citation data? The Hirsch index in economics. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 5(3):63–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engers M, Gans JS, Grant S, King SP (1999) First-author conditions. J. Political Econom. 107(4):859–883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Murray F (2015) Credit history: The changing nature of scientific credit. Jaffe AB, Jone BF, eds. The Changing Frontier: Rethinking Science and Innovation Policy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 107–134.Google Scholar
• Gans, JS, Murray F (2014) Markets for scientific attribution. NBER Working Paper 20677, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garfield E (1972) Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178(4060):471–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ginsburgh V, Zang I (2003) The museum pass game and its value. Games Econom. Behav. 43(2):322–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guillen P, Merrett D, Slonim R (2014) A new solution for the moral hazard problem in team production. Management Sci. 61(7):1514–1530.Link, Google Scholar
• Hagen NT (2008) Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: Source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis. PLoS One 3(12):e4021.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamermesh D (2013) Six decades of top economics publishing. J. Econom. Literature 51(1):162–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(46):16569–16572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hochbaum DS, Levin A (2006) Methodologies and algorithms for group-rankings decision. Management Sci. 52(9):1394–1408.Link, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):324–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson M (2008) Social and Economic Networks (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones BF (2009) The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):283–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keener JP (1993) The Perron–Frobenius theorem and the ranking of football teams. SIAM Rev. 35(1):80–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laband DN, Tollison RD (2000) Intellectual collaboration. J. Political Econom. 108(3):632–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehmann S, Jackson A, Lautrum B (2006) Measures for measures. Nature 444(7122):1003–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S (2013) Willful blindness: The inefficient reward structure in academic research. Econom. Inquiry 52(4):1267–1283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maciejovsky B, Budescu DV, Ariely D (2009) The researcher as a consumer of scientific publications: How do name-ordering conventions affect inferences about contribution credits? Marketing Sci. 28(3):589–598.Link, Google Scholar
• Marchant T (2009) Score-based bibliometric rankings of authors. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 60(6):1132–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee RP, McMillan J (1991) Optimal contracts for teams. Internat. Econom. Rev. 32(3):561–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee RP, McMillan J, Whinston MD (1989) Multiproduct monopoly, commodity bundling, and correlation of values. Quart. J. Econom. 104(2):371–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ (2010) Networks: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Page L, Brin S, Motawani R, Winograd T (1998) The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Palacios-Huerta I, Volij O (2004) The measurement of intellectual influence. Econometrica 72(3):963–977.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palacios-Huerta I, Volij O (2014) Axiomatic measures of intellectual influence. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 34(May):85–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry M, Reny PJ (2016) How to count citations if you must. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(9):2722–2741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinski G, Narin F (1976) Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Inform. Processing Management 12(5):297–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Price D (1981) Multiple authorship. Science 212(4498):986.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radicchi F, Fortunato S, Castellano C (2008) Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105(45):17268–17272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray D, Robson A (2018) Certified random: A new order for coauthorship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(2):489–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauer RD (1988) Estimates of the returns to quality and coauthorship in economic academia. J. Political Econom. 96(4):855–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen H, Barabási A (2014) Collective credit allocation in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(34):12325–12330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Stallings J, Vance E, Yang J, Vannier M, Liang J, Pang L, Dai L, Ye I, Wang G (2013) Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(24):9680–9685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomson W (2001) On the axiomatic method and its recent applications to game theory and resource allocation. Soc. Choice Welfare 18(2):327–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomson W (2011) Consistency and its converse: An introduction. Rev. Econom. Design 15(4):257–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomson W (2019) Consistent Allocation Rules. Monograph Series of the Econometric Society (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK). Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Wang D, Song C, Barabási A-L (2013) Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science 342(6154):127–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Jones B, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in the production of knowledge. Science 316(2):1036–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young P (1994) Equity in Theory and Practice (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar