Do Corporate Social Responsibility Engagements Lead to Real Environmental, Social, and Governance Impact?

References

• Agle BR, Mitchell RK, Sonnenfeld JA (1999) Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Acad. Management J. 42(5):507–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Glavas A (2012) What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. J. Management 38(4):932–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akguc S, Choi JJ, Kim SJ, McKenzie M (2014) Do private firms perform better than public firms? Working paper, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Clelland I (2004) Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Acad. Management J. 47(1):93–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal R, Wu D, Yaron A (2017) Is socially responsible investing a luxury good? Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
• Barnett ML, Salomon RM (2006) Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management J. 27(11):1101–1122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berliner D, Prakash A (2015) “Bluewashing” the firm? Voluntary regulations, program design, and member compliance with the united nations global compact. Policy Stud. J. 43(1):115–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackman A, Afsah S, Ratunanda D (2000) How do public disclosure pollution control programs work? Evidence from Indonesia. Human Ecology Rev. 11(3):235–246.Google Scholar
• Campbell JL (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):946–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlos WC, Lewis BW (2018) Strategic silence: Withholding certification status as a hypocrisy avoidance tactic. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(1):130–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cespa G, Cestone G (2007) Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(3):741–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Levine DI, Toffel MW (2009) How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(1):125–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Toffel MW (2010) How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management J. 31(9):917–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cochran PL, Wood RA (1984) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Acad. Management J. 27(1):42–56.Google Scholar
• David P, Bloom M, Hillman AJ (2007) Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management J. 28(1):91–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dehejia RH, Wahba S (2002) Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 84(1):151–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmas MA, Montes-Sancho MJ (2010) Voluntary agreements to improve environmental quality: Symbolic and substantive cooperation. Strategic Management J. 31(6):575–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F (2009) Inventing Equal Opportunity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doshi AR, Dowell GWS, Toffel MW (2013) How firms respond to mandatory information disclosure. Strategic Management J. 34(10):1209–1231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dow J, Gorton G (1997) Stock market efficiency and economic efficiency: Is there a connection? J. Finance 52(3):1087–1129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreher A (2006) Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Appl. Econom. 38(10):1091–1110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmans A (2011) Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. J. Financial Econom. 101(3):621–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, French KR (2008) Dissecting anomalies. J. Finance 63(4):1653–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C, Kacperczyk A (2016) The impact of stakeholder orientation on innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment. Management Sci. 62(7):1982–2001.Link, Google Scholar
• Gilje EP, Tallard JP (2016) Do private firms invest differently than public firms? Taking cues from the natural gas industry. J. Finance 71(4):1733–1778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gillan SL, Starks LT (2000) Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. J. Financial Econom. 57(2):275–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graves SB, Waddock SA (1994) Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Acad. Management J. 37(4):1034–1046.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ, Dorobantu S, Nartey LJ (2014) Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1727–1748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B, Tirole J (1993) Market liquidity and performance monitoring. J. Political Econom. 101(4):678–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H, Kostovetsky L (2012) Red and blue investing: Values and finance. J. Financial Econom. 103(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hull CE, Rothenberg S (2008) Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management J. 29(7):781–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2015) The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts’ perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management J. 36(7):1053–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2016) The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting: Evidence from four countries. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Jaganathan R (2016) ESG investing: Why owners of money should care. Working paper, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Jones DA (2010) Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 83(4):857–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A (2009) With greater power comes greater responsibility? Takeover protection and corporate attention to stakeholders. Strategic Management J. 30(3):261–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kayser SA, Maxwell JW, Toffel MW (2016) Signaling without certification: The critical role of civil society scrutiny. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kendall BE, Gill R, Cheney G (2007) Consumer activism and corporate social responsibility: How strong a connection? May SK, Cheney G, Roper J, eds. The Debate Over Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press, New York), 241–264.Google Scholar
• Khanna M, Damon LA (1999) EPA’s voluntary 33/50 program: Impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms. J. Environ. Econom. Management 37(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim EH, Lyon TP (2011) Strategic environmental disclosure: Evidence from the Doe’s voluntary greenhouse gas registry. J. Environ. Econom. Management 61(3):311–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim, EH, Lyon TP (2014) Greenwash vs. brownwash: Exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure. Organ. Sci. 26(3):705–723.Link, Google Scholar
• King AA, Lenox MJ (2000) Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Acad. Management J. 43(4):698–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruger P (2015) Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. J. Financial Econom. 115(2):304–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lel U, Miller D, Reisel N (2014) Differences in agency problems between public and private firms: Evidence from top management turnover. Working paper, University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
• Lev B, Petrovits C, Radhakrishnan S (2010) Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management J. 31(2):182–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin A, Lindstrom L, Nestle M (2006) Commentary: Food industry promises to address childhood obesity: Preliminary evaluation. J. Public Health Policy 27(4):327–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopatta K, Jaeschke R, Tchikov M, Lodhia S (2017) Corruption, corporate social responsibility and financial constraints: International firm-level evidence. Eur. Management Rev. 14(1):47–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Bhattacharya CB (2006) Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. J. Marketing 70(4):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Toffel MW, Zhou Y (2016) Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organ. Sci. 27(2):483–504.Link, Google Scholar
• McGuire JB, Sundgren A, Schneeweis T (1988) Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Acad. Management J. 31(4):854–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neubaum DO, Zahra SA (2006) Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. J. Management 32(1):108–131.Google Scholar
• Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organ. Stud. 24(3):403–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reid EM, Toffel MW (2009) Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management J. 30(11):1157–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivoli P, Waddock SA (2011) “First they ignore you …”: The time-context dynamic and corporate responsibility. Calif. Management Rev. 53(2):87–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rysman M, Simcoe T, Wang Y (2018) Differentiation strategies in the adoption of environmental standards: LEED from 2000–2014. Working paper, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Schuler DA, Cording M (2006) A corporate social performance–corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):540–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz MS, Carroll AB (2003) Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Bus. Ethics Quart. 13(4):503–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen S, Bhattacharya CB (2001) Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J. Marketing Res. 38(2):225–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Servaes H, Tamayo A (2013) The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Sci. 59(5):1045–1061.Link, Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Vredenburg H (1998) Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management J. 19(8):729–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheen A (2016) Do public and private firms behave differently? An examination of investment in the chemical industry. Working paper, University of Oregon, Eugene.Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1990) Equilibrium short horizons of investors and firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(2):148–153.Google Scholar
• Simcoe T, Toffel MW (2014) Government green procurement spillovers: Evidence from municipal building policies in California. J. Environ. Econom. Management 68(3):411–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slawinski N, Bansal P (2012) A matter of time: The temporal perspectives of organizational responses to climate change. Organ. Stud. 33(11):1537–1563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stein JC (1989) Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporate behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 104:655–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevens JM, Steensma HK, Harrison DA, Cochran PL (2005) Symbolic or substantive document? The influence of ethics codes on financial executives’ decisions. Strategic Management J. 26(2):181–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart EA (2010) Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statist. Sci. 25(1):1–21.Google Scholar
• Surroca J, Tribó JA, Waddock S (2010) Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management J. 31(5):463–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toffel MW, Short J (2011) Coming clean and cleaning up: Does voluntary self-reporting indicate effective self-policing? J. Law Econom. 54(3):609–649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turban DB, Greening DW (1997) Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad. Management J. 40(3):658–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Videras JR, Ann OL (2006) Public goods provision and well-being: Empirical evidence consistent with the warm glow theory. B. E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy 5(1):1–40.Google Scholar
• Visser W (2008) Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Von Thadden EL (1995) Long-term contracts, short-term investment and monitoring. Rev. Econom. Stud. 62(4):557–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waddock SA, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management J. 18(4):303–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang T, Bansal P (2012) Social responsibility in new ventures: Profiting from a long-term orientation. Strategic Management J. 33(10):1135–1153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Li J, Anupindi R 2017. Risky suppliers or risky supply chains? An empirical analysis of sub-tier supply network structure on firm performance in the high-tech sector. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Weaver GR, Trevino LK, Cochran PL (1999) Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Acad. Management J. 42(5):539–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1994) Substance and symbolism in CEOs’ long-term incentive plans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39:367–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (2001) Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):202–228.Crossref, Google Scholar