Do Director Networks Matter for Financial Reporting Quality? Evidence from Audit Committee Connectedness and Restatements

References

• Abbott LJ, Parker S, Peters GF (2004) Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing 23(1):69–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acito A, Burks J, Johnson WB (2009) Materiality decision and the correction of accounting errors. Accounting Rev. 84(3):659–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams R, Ferreira D (2008) Do directors perform for pay? J. Accounting Econom. 46(1):154–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ai C, Norton E (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Archambeault DS, Dezoort TF, Hermanson DR (2008) Audit committee incentive compensation and accounting restatements. Contemporary Accounting Res. 25(4):965–992.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashbaugh H, LaFond R, Mayhew BW (2003) Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. Accounting Rev. 78(3):611–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashbaugh-Skaife H, Collins D, Kinney WR Jr, LaFond R (2008) The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies and their remediation on accrual quality. Accounting Rev. 47(1):217–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baber WR, Janakiraman SN, Kang SH (1996) Investment opportunities and the structure of executive compensation. J. Accounting Econom. 21(3):297–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Badertscher B, Hribar P, Jenkins N (2011) Informed trading and the market reaction to accounting restatements. Accounting Rev. 86(5):1519–1547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnea A, Guedj I (2009) Director networks. Working paper, HEC Montreal and Analysis Research Planning Corporation, Montreal.Google Scholar
• Beasley M (1996) An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Rev. 71(4):443–465.Google Scholar
• Beauchamp MA (1965) An improved index of centrality. Behav. Sci. 10(2):161–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bedard J, Chtourou S, Courteau L (2004) The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing 23(2):13–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell TB, Tabor RH (1991) Empirical analysis of audit uncertainty qualifications. J. Accounting Res. 29(2):350–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger PG, Ofek E, Yermack DL (1997) Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions. J. Finance 52(4):1411–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry TK, Bizjak JM, Lemmon ML, Naveen L (2006) Organizational complexity and CEO labor markets: Evidence from diversified firms. J. Corporate Finance 12(4):797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1998) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Poitical Econom. 100(5):992–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bizjak J, Lemmon M, Whitby R (2009) Option backdating and board interlocks. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(11):4821–4847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonacich P (1972) Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. J. Math. Sociol. 2(2):113–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonacich P (1987) Power and centrality: A family of measures. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(6):1170–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonacich P (1991) Simultaneous group and individual centralities. Soc. Networks 13(2):155–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S (2005) Centrality and network flow. Soc. Networks 27(1):55–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S, Halgin D (2011) On network theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1168–1181.Link, Google Scholar
• Brazel JF, Jones KL, Zimbelman MF (2009) Using nonfinancial measures to assess fraud risk. J. Accounting Res. 47(5):1135–1166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brickley JA, Coles JL, Jarrell G (1997) Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and chairman of the board. J. Corporate Finance 3(3):189–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brochet F, Srinivasan S (2014) Accountability of independent directors: Evidence from firms subject to securities litigation. J. Financial Econom. 111(2):430–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JL (2011) The spread of aggressive corporate tax reporting: A detailed examination of the corporate-owned life insurance shelter. Accounting Rev. 86(1):23–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JL, Drake KD (2014) Network ties among low-tax firm. Accounting Rev. 89(2):483–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budescu DV, Rantilla AK (2000) Confidence in aggregation of expert opinions. Acta Psych. (Amsterdam) 104(3):371–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai J, Garner J, Walkling R (2009) Electing directors. J. Finance 64(5):2389–2421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Myer L, Omer T (2012) Does company reputation matter for financial reporting quality? Evidence from restatements. Contemporary Accounting Res. 29(3):956–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Miller D (2015) A practitioners guide to cluster-robust inference. J. Human Resources 50(2):317–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Gelbach J, Miller D (2011) Robust inference with multiway clustering. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(2):238–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carcello JV, Nagy AL (2004) Client size, auditor specialization and fraudulent reporting. Management Auditing J. 19(5):651–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chakravarthy J, deHaan E, Rajgopal S (2014) Reputation repair after a serious restatement. Accounting Rev. 89(4):1329–1363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiu P, Teoh SH, Tian F (2013) Board interlocks and earnings management contagion. Accounting Rev. 88(3):915–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen BE, Glover SM, Omer TC, Shelley MK (2016) Understanding audit quality: Insights from audit professionals and investors. Contemporary Accounting Res. 33(4):1648–1684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen BE, Omer TC, Shelley MK, Wong PA (2018) Affiliated former partners on the audit committee: Influence on the auditor-client relationship and audit quality. Working paper, University of Oklahoma, Norman.Google Scholar
• Chung H, Kallapur S (2003) Client importance, nonaudit services, and abnormal accruals. Accounting Rev. 78(4):931–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Gaynor LM, Krishnamoorthy G, Wright AM (2007) Auditor communications with the audit committee and the board of directors: Policy recommendations and opportunities for future research. Accounting Horizons 21(2):165–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Frazzini A, Malloy C (2008) The small world of investing: Board connections and mutual fund managers. J. Political Econom. 116(5):951–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Frazzini A, Malloy C (2010) Sell side school ties. J. Finance 65(4):1409–1437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conyon M, Muldoon M (2006) The small world of corporate boards. J. Bus. Finance Accounting 33(9/10):1321–1343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dechow P, Tan S (2016) How do accounting practices spread? An examination of law firm networks and stock option backdating. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Dechow P, Ge W, Schrand C (2010) Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. J. Accounting Econom. 50(2):344–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeFond ML, Jiambalvo JJ (1994) Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. J. Accounting Econom. 17(1):145–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dharwadkar R, Harris DG, Shi L, Zhou N (2016) Audit committee interlocks and the contagion of accrual-based and real earnings management. Working paper, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
• Dichev ID, Skinner DJ (2002) Large-sample evidence on the debt covenant hypothesis. J. Accounting Res. 40(4):1091–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doyle J, Ge W, McVay S (2007a) Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. J. Accounting Econom. 44(1):193–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doyle J, Ge W, McVay S (2007b) Accruals quality and internal control over financial reporting. Accounting Rev. 82(5):1141–1170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunn KA, Mayhew BW (2004) Audit firm industry specialization and client disclosure quality. Rev. Accounting Stud. 9(1):35–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelberg J, Gao P, Parsons CA (2012) Friends with money. J. Financial Econom. 103(1):169–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erickson M, Hanlon M, Maydew EL (2006) Is there a link between executive equity incentives and accounting fraud? J. Accounting Res. 44(1):113–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erkens D, Bonner S (2013) The role of firm status in appointments of accounting financial experts to audit committees. Accounting Rev. 88(1):107–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertimur Y, Ferri F, Maber DA (2012) Reputation penalties for poor monitoring of executive pay: Evidence from option backdating. J. Financial Econom. 104(1):118–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF (1980) Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J. Political Econom. 88(2):288–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, French KR (1997) Industry costs of equity. J. Financial Econom. 43(2):153–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(1):301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feroz EH, Park K, Pastena VS (1991) The financial and market effects of the SEC’s accounting and auditing enforcement releases. J. Accounting Res. 29(Supplement):107–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fich EM, Shivdasani A (2006) Are busy boards effective monitors? J. Finance 61(2):689–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frankel RM, Johnson MF, Nelson KK (2002) The relation between auditors’ fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. Accounting Rev. 77(suppl.):71–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1(3):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ge W (2006) Off-balance-sheet activities, earnings persistence and stock prices: Evidence from operating leases. Working paper, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
• Ge W, McVay S (2005) The disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Accounting Horizons 19(3):137–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Ayal S, Ariely D (2009) Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psych. Sci. 20(3):393–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Westphal J (1999) Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(3):473–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild PR (1993) Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(4):564–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes RE, Schaefer S (1999) How much are differences in managerial abilities worth? J. Accounting Econom. 27(2):125–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite C (1996) Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library Inform. Sci. Res. 18(4):323–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennes K, Leone A, Miller B (2008) The importance of distinguishing errors from irregularities in restatement research: The case of restatements and CEO/CFO turnover. Accounting Rev. 83(6):1487–1519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herdman R (2002) Speech by SEC staff: Making audit committees more effective. Speech, Tulane Corporate Law Institute, March 7, New Orleans. Available at https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch543.htm.Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (1988) The determinants of board composition. RAND J. Econom. 19(4):589–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (2003) Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Federal Reserve Bank New York Econom. Policy Rev. 9(1):7–26.Google Scholar
• Hong G, Lee S, Matsunaga S, Oh P (2016) CEO networks and information aggregation: Evidence from management forecast accuracy. Working paper, University of California, Riverside, Riverside.Google Scholar
• Hribar P, Jenkins N (2004) The effect of accounting restatements on earnings revisions and the estimated cost of capital. Rev. Accounting Stud. 9(2):337–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang B, Kim S (2012) Social ties and earnings management. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Intintoli VJ, Kahle KM, Zhao W (2018) Director connectedness: Monitoring efficacy and career prospects. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 53(1):65–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson BW, Magee R, Nagarajan N, Newman H (1985) An analysis of the stock price reaction to sudden executive death: Implications for the management labor market. J. Accounting Econom. 7(1):151–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kinney WR Jr, McDaniel LS (1989) Characteristics of firms correcting previously reported quarterly earnings. J. Accounting Econom. 11(1):71–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kinney WR Jr, Palmrose ZV, Scholz S (2004) Auditor independence, non-audit services, and restatements: Was the U.S. government right? J. Accounting Res. 42(3):561–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein A (2002) Audit committee, board of director characteristics and earnings management. J. Accounting Econom. 33(3):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kravet T, Shevlin T (2010) Accounting restatements and information risk. Rev. Accounting Stud. 15(2):264–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan J, Wen Y, Zhao W (2011) Legal expertise on corporate audit committees and financial reporting quality. Accounting Rev. 86(6):2099–2130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larcker DF, Richardson SA, Tuna I (2007) Corporate governance, accounting outcomes, and organizational performance. Accounting Rev. 82(4):963–1008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larcker DF, So EC, Wang CY (2013) Boardroom centrality and firm performance. J. Accounting Econom. 55(2/3):225–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long JS (1997) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Masulis RW, Mobbs S (2014) Independent director incentives: Where do talented directors spend their limited time and energy? J. Financial Econom. 111(2):406–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masulis RW, Mobbs S (2016) Supply and demand for independent director services: Major board decisions and corporate outcomes. Working paper, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
• McGuire ST, Omer TC, Wilde JH (2014) Investment opportunity sets, operating uncertainty, and capital market pressure: Determinants of investments in tax shelter activities. J. Amer. Taxation Assoc. 36(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milbourn TT (2003) CEO reputation and stock-based compensation. J. Financial Econom. 68(2):233–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizruchi M (1996) What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Rev. Sociol. 22(1):271–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mol M (2001) Creating wealth through working with others: Interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Executive 15(1):150–152.Google Scholar
• Myers JN, Myers LA, Skinner DJ (2007) Earning momentum and earnings management. J. Accounting Auditing Finance 22(2):249–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ (2005) A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Soc. Networks 27(1):39–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ (2010) Networks: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ, Barabási A-L, Watts DJ (2006) The Structure and Dynamics of Networks (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Nguyen BD, Nielsen KM (2010) The value of independent directors: Evidence from sudden deaths. J. Financial Econom. 98(3):550–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norton EC, Wang H, Ai C (2004) Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata J. 4(2):154–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Omer T, Shelley M, Tice F (2014) Do well-connected directors affect firm value? J. Appl. Finance 24(2):17–32.Google Scholar
• Palmer D, Friedland R, Singh J (1986) The ties that bind: Organizational and class bases of stability in a corporate interlock network. Am. Sociol. Rev. 51(6):781–796.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmer D, Jennings PD, Zhou X (1993) Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large U.S. corporations: Institutional, political, and economic accounts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(1):100–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmrose Z, Richardson V, Scholz S (2004) Determinants of market reactions to restatement announcements. J. Accounting Econom. 37(1):59–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen M (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(1):435–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps C, Hiedl R, Wadhwa A (2012) Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. J. Management 38(4):1115–1166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rice S, Weber D (2012) How effective is internal control reporting under SOX 404? Determinants of the (non-)disclosure of existing material effectiveness. J. Accounting Res. 50(3):811–844.Google Scholar
• Richardson S, Tuna I, Wu M (2002) Predicting earnings management: The case of earnings restatements. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rubin A, Segal D (2013) Directors skill and financial reporting quality. Working paper, Simon Fraser University and Interdisciplinary Center Herzliyah, Burnaby, BC, Canada and Hertsliya, Israel.Google Scholar
• Sah RK (1991) Social osmosis and patterns of crime. J. Political Econom. 99(6):1272–1295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schonlau R, Singh PV (2009) Board networks and merger performance. Working paper, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.Google Scholar
• Shepardson M (2013) Audit committee member contextual experiences and financial reporting outcomes. Working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
• Snyder P, Priem R, Levitas E (2009) The diffusion of illegal innovations among management elites. Working paper, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar
• Sparrow R, Liden R, Wayne S, Kraimer M (2001) Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad. Management J. 44(2):316–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S (2005) Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: Evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members. J. Accounting Res. 43(2):291–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephenson KA, Zelen M (1989) Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples. Soc. Networks 11(1):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Summers SL, Sweeney JT (1998) Fraudulently misstated financial statements and insider trading: An empirical analysis. Accounting Rev. 73(1):131–146.Google Scholar
• Sweeney AP (1994) Debt-covenant violations and managers’ accounting responses. J. Accounting Econom. 17(3):281–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson S (2010) Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and year. J. Financial Econom. 99(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W (2001) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. 44(5):996–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (2002) Financial Oversight of Enron: The SEC and Private-Sector Watchdogs, S. Prt. 107-75 (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xie B, Davidson WN, DaDalt P (2003) Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. J. Corporate Finance 9(3):295–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yermack D (1996) Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. J. Finance 40(2):185–211.Google Scholar
• Yermack D (2004) Remuneration, retention, and reputation incentives for outside directors. J. Finance 59(5):2281–2308.Crossref, Google Scholar