Influence Activities, Coalitions, and Uniform Policies: Implications for the Regulation of Financial Institutions

References

• Acharya VV (2009) A theory of systemic risk and design of prudential bank regulation. J. Financial Stability 5(3):224–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acharya VV, Ryan SG (2016) Banks’ financial reporting and financial system stability. J. Accounting Res. 54(2):277–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackerman A (2018) Senate passes bill easing banking rules. Wall Street Journal (March 14), https://www.wsj.com/articles/rollback-of-crisis-era-banking-rules-clears-senate-1521067499.Google Scholar
• Ackerman A, Tracy R (2018) Lawmakers expand scope of senate bank-deregulation bill. Wall Street Journal (March 7), https://www.wsj.com/articles/lawmakers-expand-scope-of-senate-bank-deregulation-bill-1520471340.Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, Lucca D, Seru A, Trebbi F (2014) Inconsistent regulators: Evidence from banking. Quart. J. Econom. 129(2):889–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aumann RJ, Dreze JH (1974) Cooperative games with coalition structures. Internat. J. Game Theory 3(4):217–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aumann RJ, Maschler M (1964) The bargaining set for cooperative games. Dresher M, Shapley L, Tucker A, eds. Advances in Game Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 443–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baccara M, Yariv L (2016) Choosing peers: Homophily and polarization in groups. J. Econom. Theory 165:152–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk L, Neeman Z (2010) Investor protection and interest group politics. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(3):1089–1119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertomeu J, Magee R (2011) From low-quality reporting to financial crises: Politics of disclosure regulation along the economic cycle. J. Accounting Econom. 52(2):209–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertomeu J, Magee RP (2014) Political pressures and the evolution of disclosure regulation. Rev. Accounting Stud. 20(2):775–802.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertomeu J, Magee RP (2015) Mandatory disclosure and asymmetry in financial reporting. J. Accounting Econom. 59(2):284–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Bombardini M, Trebbi F (2014) Is it whom you know or what you know? An empirical assessment of the lobbying process. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(12):3885–3920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanes i Vidal J, Draca M, Fons-Rosen C (2012) Revolving door lobbyists. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3731–3748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloch F (2002) Coalitions and networks in industrial organization. Manchester School 70(1):36–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bogardus K (2013) Corporate lobbying fuels coalition craze. The Hill (June 18), http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/306091-corporate-lobbying-fuels-coalition-craze-on-k-street.Google Scholar
• Bombardini M, Trebbi F (2012) Competition and political organization: Together or alone in lobbying for trade policy? J. Internat. Econom. 87(1):18–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carletti E, Dell’Ariccia MG, Marquez MR (2016) Supervisory incentives in a banking union. Working paper, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Clozel L (2018) Big banks reshape lobbying game. Wall Street Journal (July 16), https://www.wsj.com/articles/big-banks-reshape-lobbying-game-1531733401.Google Scholar
• Cooper MJ, Gulen H, Ovtchinnikov AV (2010) Corporate political contributions and stock returns. J. Finance 65(2):687–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damania R, Fredriksson PG (2000) On the formation of industry lobby groups. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 41(4):315–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamond DW, Dybvig PH (1983) Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. J. Political Econom. 91(3):401–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donelson DC, McInnis J, Mergenthaler RD (2016) Explaining rules-based characteristics in US GAAP: Theories and evidence. J. Accounting Res. 54(3):827–861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drazen A, Limão N, Stratmann T (2007) Political contribution caps and lobby formation: Theory and evidence. J. Public Econom. 91(3):723–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellickson B, Grodal B, Scotchmer S, Zame WR (1999) Clubs and the market. Econometrica 67(5):1185–1217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foarta D (2018) The limits to partial banking unions: A political economy approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(4–5):1187–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman HL, Heinle MS (2016) Lobbying and uniform disclosure regulation. J. Accounting Res. 54(3):863–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaeser E, Johnson S, Shleifer A (2001) Coase vs. the coasians. Quart. J. Econom. 116(3):853–899.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein I, Sapra H (2014) Should banks’ stress test results be disclosed? An analysis of the costs and benefits. Foundations Trends Finance 8(1):1–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopalan Y, Kalda A, Manela A (2017) Hub-and-spoke regulation and bank leverage. Working paper, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis.Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office (2017) Improved implementation of federal reserve policies could help mitigate threats to independence. Technical report, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Goyal R, Brooks PK, Pradhan M, Tressel MT, Dell’Ariccia MG, Pazarbasioglu C (2013) A banking union for the euro area. Working paper, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Granja J, Leuz C (2018) The death of a regulator: Strict supervision, bank lending and business activity. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Gregor M (2011) Corporate lobbying: A review of the recent literature. Working paper, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
• Grossman G, Helpman E (1994) Protection for sale. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(4):833–850.Google Scholar
• Grossman G, Helpman E (1996) Electoral competition and special interest politics. Rev. Econom. Stud. 63(2):265–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guida V (2018) Large banks raise their lobbying game with trade group shakeup. Politico (January 8), https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/08/large-banks-raise-their-lobbying-game-with-trade-group-shakeup-269393.Google Scholar
• Ho C (2015) Coalitions of the willing are latest lobbying trend. Washington Post (June 16), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2015/06/16/coalitions-of-the-willing-are-latest-lobbying-trend/.Google Scholar
• Igan D, Mishra P (2014) Wall Street, Capitol Hill, and K Street: Political influence and financial regulation. J. Law Econom. 57(4):1063–1084.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Igan D, Mishra P, Tressel T (2012) A fistful of dollars: Lobbying and the financial crisis. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 26(1):195–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson S, Kwak J (2011) 13 Bankers: The Wall Street Takeover and the Next Financial Meltdown (Vintage Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Kang K, You HY 2018. Lobbyists as matchmakers in the market for access. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
• Kim D, Santomero AM (1988) Risk in banking and capital regulation. J. Finance 43(5):1219–1233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim MP 2019. Principles-based accounting standards and regulatory enforcement. Working paper, Florida State University, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
• Kóczy LÁ (2007) A recursive core for partition function form games. Theory Decision 63(1):41–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroszner RS, Strahan PE (1999) What drives deregulation? Economics and politics of the relaxation of bank branching restrictions. Quart. J. Econom. 114(4):1437–1467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambert T (2019) Lobbying on regulatory enforcement actions: Evidence from us commercial and savings banks. Management Sci. 65(6):2545–2572.Link, Google Scholar
• Laver M, Shepsle KA (1990) Coalitions and cabinet government. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 84(3):873–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magee C (2002) Endogenous trade policy and lobby formation: An application to the free-rider problem. J. Internat. Econom. 57(2):449–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitra D (1999) Endogenous lobby formation and endogenous protection: A long-run model of trade policy determination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(5):1116–1134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1978) Threat equilibria and fair settlements in cooperative games. Math. Oper. Res. 3(4):265–274.Link, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (2013) Game Theory (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nordhaus W (2015) Climate clubs: Overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(4):1339–1370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pecorino P (1998) Is there a free-rider problem in lobbying? Endogenous tariffs, trigger strategies, and the number of firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(3):652–660.Google Scholar
• Ray D, Vohra R (1997) Equilibrium binding agreements. J. Econom. Theory 73(1):30–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray D, Vohra R (1999) A theory of endogenous coalition structures. Games Econom. Behav. 26(2):286–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray D, Vohra R (2014) Coalition formation. Young HP, Zamir S, eds. Handbook of Game Theory, vol. 4 (North Holland, Amsterdam), 239–326.Google Scholar
• Ray K (2017) One size fits all? Costs and benefits of uniform accounting standards. J. Internat. Accounting Res. 17(1):1–23.Google Scholar
• Rodrik D (1986) Tariffs, subsidies, and welfare with endogenous policy. J. Internat. Econom. 21(3):285–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler G (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J. Econom. 2(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thrall RM, Lucas WF (1963) N-person games in partition function form. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 10(1):281–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wilson R (1968) The theory of syndicates. Econometrica 36(1):119–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wong CH (2018) China unveils overhaul of government bureaucracy. Wall Street Journal (March 13), https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-unveils-overhaul-of-government-bureaucracy-1520905490.Google Scholar
• Yi S-S (1997) Stable coalition structures with externalities. Games Econom. Behav. 20(2):201–237.Crossref, Google Scholar