The Political Economy of Labor Employment Decisions: Evidence from China

References

• Anderson MC, Banker RD, Janakiraman SN (2003) Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”? J. Accounting Res. 41(1):47–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen F, Qian J, Qian M (2005) Law, finance, and economic growth in China. J. Financial Econom. 77(1):57–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan R, Gruca TS (2008) Cost stickiness and core competency: A note. Contemporary Accounting Res. 25(4):993–1006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan R, Petersen M, Soderstrom NS (2004) Does capacity utilization affect the “stickiness” of cost? J. Accounting Auditing Finance 19(3):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Byzalov D (2014) Asymmetric cost behavior. J. Management Accounting Res. 26(2):43–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Byzalov D, Chen L (2013) Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior. J. Accounting Econom. 55(1):111–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Huang R, Natarajan R (2011) Equity incentives and long-term value created by SG&A expenditure. Contemporary Accounting Res. 28(3):794–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Byzalov D, Ciftci M, Mashruwala R (2014) The moderating effect of prior sales changes on asymmetric cost behavior. J. Management Accounting Res. 26(2):221–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J. Political Econom. 111(5):1043–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Kramarz F, Schoar A, Thesmar D (2007) Politicians, firms and the political business cycle: Evidence from France. Working paper. Accessed November 1, 2015, http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/marianne.bertrand/research/papers/politics_060207_v4.pdf.Google Scholar
• Boycko M, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1996) A theory of privatization. Econom. J. (London) 106(435):309–319.Google Scholar
• Bu D, Wen C, Banker RD (2015) Implications of asymmetric cost behaviour for analysing financial reports of companies in China. China J. Accounting Stud. 3(3):181–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calomiris CW, Fisman R, Wang Y (2010) Profiting from government stakes in a command economy: Evidence from Chinese asset sales. J. Financial Econom. 96(3):399–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Canaves S, Areddy JT (2009) Murder bares worker anger over China industrial reform. Wall Street Journal (July 31), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB124899768509595465.Google Scholar
• Cao J, Lemmon ML, Pan X, Tian G (2019) Political promotion, CEO compensation and their effect on firm performance. Management Sci. 65(7):2947–2965.Google Scholar
• Chen C, Lu H, Sougiannis T (2012) The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Res. 29(1):252–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen D, Kim JB, Li O, Liang S (2018) China’s closed pyramidal managerial labor market and the stock price crash risk. Accounting Rev. 93(3):105–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen S, Sun Z, Tang S, Wu D (2011) Government intervention and investment efficiency: Evidence from China. J. Corporate Finance 17(2):259–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen T, Kung J (2016) Do land revenue windfalls create a political resource curse? Evidence from China. J. Development Econom. 123:86–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Lee C-WJ, Li J (2008) Government assisted earnings management in China. J. Accounting Public Policy 27(3):262–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li H, Zhou L (2005) Relative performance evaluation and the turnover provincial leaders in China. Econom. Lett. 88(3):421–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dai Y, Pan Y, Feng S (2014) Are Chinese enterprises’ charitable donations “political contributions”? Evidence from the replacements of the municipal party secretaries. Econom. Res. J. 49(2):74–86.Google Scholar
• Dechow P (1994) Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals. J. Accounting Econom. 18(1):3–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dierynck B, Landsman WR, Renders A (2012) Do managerial incentives drive cost behavior? Evidence about the role of the zero earnings benchmark for labor cost behavior in private Belgian firms. Accounting Rev. 87(4):1219–1246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economic Observations(2014) Abandoning the GDP measure—officials say they no longer need to work like crazy (August 22), http://www.eeo.com.cn/2014/0822/265286.shtml.Google Scholar
• Faccio M (2006) Politically connected firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):369–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan G, Wang X, Zhu H (2011) The 2011 Report on the Relative Process of Marketization of Each Region in China (Economic Science Press, Beijing).Google Scholar
• Fan J, Wong TJ, Zhang T (2007) Politically-connected CEOs, corporate governance and post-IPO performance of China’s partially privatized firms. J. Financial Econom. 84(2):330–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• First Financial Daily (2013) Calling for the implementation of the rule for prefectural government and party leaders’ term of office (November 13), https://www.yicai.com/news/3106338.html.Google Scholar
• Firth M, Rui O, Wu W (2011) The effects of political connections and state ownership on corporate litigation in China. J. Law Econom. 54(3):573–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green S (2013) What makes 10 million local government officials tick? Research report, Standard Chartered Bank. Acccessed November 1, 2015, http://www.cf40.org.cn/plus/view.php?aid=7457.Google Scholar
• Gu Z, Wang K, Xiao X (2013) Government control and executive compensation: Evidence from China. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Hirsch BT (1991) Union coverage and profitability among US firms. Rev. Econom. Statist. 73(1):69–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holzhacker M, Krishnan R, Mahlendorf MD (2015) The impact of changes in regulation on cost behavior. Contemporary Accounting Res. 32(2):534–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hope O-K, Thomas W (2008) Managerial empire building and firm disclosure. J. Accounting Res. 46(3):591–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jian M, Wong TJ (2010) Propping through related party transactions. Rev. Accounting Stud. 15(1):70–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang G, Lee C, Yue H (2010) Tunneling through intercorporate loans: The China experience. J. Financial Econom. 98(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Yao W, Hu Y (2016) The enforcement of the Minimum Wage Policy in China and firm cost stickiness. Accounting Res. 37(10):56–62.Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Hu Y, Zeng Y (2015) Financial constraints and cost stickiness: Evidence from Chinese industrial firms. J. Financial Res. 58(10):133–147.Google Scholar
• Kama I, Weiss D (2013) Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs? J. Accounting Res. 51(1):201–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landry PF (2012) Decentralized Authoritarianism in China: The Communist Party’s Control of Local Elites in the Post-Mao Era (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.).Google Scholar
• Lee HY (2000) Xiagang, the Chinese style of laying off workers. Asian Surveys 40(6):914–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhou L (2005) Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. J. Public Econom. 89(9–10):1743–1762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Meng L, Zhang J (2006) Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? Evidence from China. Econom. Inquiry 44(3):559–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Meng L, Wang Q, Zhou L-A (2008) Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. J. Development Econom. 87(2):283–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Liu B (2014) Employment protection legislation, cost stickiness, and corporate responses. Econom. Res. J. 49(5):63–76.Google Scholar
• Luo D, She G (2015) Official’s turnover and local government debt issue. Econom. Res. J. 6:131–146.Google Scholar
• Pigou AC (1932) The Economics of Welfare, 4th ed. (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Piotroski J, Wong TJ (2012) Institutions and information environment of Chinese listed firms. Fan J, Morck R, Yeung B, eds. Capitalizing China (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 201–246.Google Scholar
• Rajan RG, Zingales L (1998) Financial dependence and growth. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(3):559–586.Google Scholar
• Rawski TG (1999) Reforming China’s economy: What have we learned? China J. 41(1):139–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rithmire ME (2014) China’s “new regionalism”: Subnational analysis in Chinese political economy. World Politics 66(1):165–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sappington D, Stiglitz JE (1987) Privatization, information and incentives. J. Policy Anal. Management 6(4):567–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz G, Clements B (1999) Government subsidies. J. Econom. Surveys 13(2):119–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C, Willig R (1990) Economic rationales for the scope of privatization. Suleiman EN, Waterbury J, eds. The Political Economy of Public Sector Reform and Privatization (Westview Press, London), 55–87.Google Scholar
• Shenzhen Stock Exchange (2008) Research report: An empirical study of the development of non-state-owned public firms in China. Accessed November 1, 2015, https://www.szse.cn/main/files/2008/02/25/091811911155.pdf.Google Scholar
• Shih V, Adolph C, Liu M (2012) Getting ahead in the Communist Party: Explaining the advancement of central committee members in China. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 106(1):166–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A (1997) Government in transition. Eur. Econom. Rev. 41(3–5):385–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny R (2002) The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Shust E, Weiss D (2014) Discussion of asymmetric cost behavior— Stick costs: Expenses vs. cash flows. J. Management Accounting Res. 26(2):81–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun Q, Tong W (2003) China share issue privatization: The extent of its success. J. Financial Econom. 70(2):183–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang S, Sun Z (2014) Political connections, CEO compensations, and firm future performance. Management World 30(5):93–105.Google Scholar
• Wang J (2010) A comparison of shareholder identity and governance mechanisms in the monitoring of CEOs of listed companies in China. China Econom. Rev. 21(1):24–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Wong TJ, Xia L (2008) State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: Evidence from China. J. Accounting Econom. 46(1):112–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss D (2010) Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts. Accounting Rev. 85(4):1441–1474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Wong TJ (2016) Corporate governance research on listed firms in China: Institutions, governance and accountability. Foundations Trends Accounting 9(4):259–326.Google Scholar
• Wu J, Deng Y, Huang J, Morck R, Yeung B (2014) Incentives and outcomes: China’s environmental policy. Capitalism Society 9(1):Article 2.Google Scholar
• Xu N, Xu X, Yuan Q (2013) Political connection, financing frictions, and corporate investment: Evidence from Chinese listed family firms. Eur. Financial Management 19(4):675–702.Crossref, Google Scholar