Why Won’t You Listen to Me? Measuring Receptiveness to Opposing Views

References

• Albarracín D, Mitchell AL (2004) The role of defensive confidence in preference for proattitudinal information: How believing that one is strong can sometimes be a defensive weakness. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 30(12):1565–1584. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altemeyer B (2006) The Authoritarians. Accessed June 4, 2019, https://theauthoritarians.org/Downloads/TheAuthoritarians.pdf.Google Scholar
• Aquino K, Reed AI (2002) The self-importance of moral identity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(6):1423–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron J (1995) Myside bias in thinking about abortion. Thinking Reasoning 1(3):221–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beer A, Watson D (2009) The individual and group loyalty scales (IGLS): Construction and preliminary validation. J. Personality Assessment 91(3):277–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briñol P, Rucker DD, Tormala ZL, Petty RE (2004). Individual differences in resistance to persuasion: The role of beliefs and meta-beliefs. Knowles ES, Linn JA, eds. Resistance and Persuasion (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ), 83–104.Google Scholar
• Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psych. Bull. 56(2):81–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, Kao CF (1984) The efficient assessment of need for cognition. J. Personality Assessment 48(3):306–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen FS, Minson JA, Tormala ZL (2010) Tell me more: The effects of expressed interest on receptiveness during dialog. J. Experimental Soc. Psych. 46(5):850–853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen FS, Minson JA, Schöne M, Heinrichs M (2013) In the eye of the beholder: Eye contact increases resistance to persuasion. Psych. Sci. 24(11):2254–2261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curhan JR, Elfenbein HA, Eisenkraft N (2010) The objective value of subjective value: A multi‐round negotiation study. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 40(3):690–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curhan JR, Elfenbein HA, Kilduff GJ (2009) Getting off on the right foot: Subjective value vs. economic value in predicting longitudinal job outcomes from job offer negotiations. J. Appl. Psych. 94(2):524–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curhan JR, Elfenbein HA, Xu H (2006) What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(3):493–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis MH (1980) A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 10(85):85–103.Google Scholar
• Dawson E, Gilovich T, Regan DT (2002) Motivated reasoning and performance on the Wason selection task. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 28(10):1379–1387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK, Weingart LR (2003) Task vs. relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):741–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dweck CS, Leggett EL (1988) A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psych. Rev. 95(2):256–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH (1999) The processing of nested persuasive messages. Psych. Inquiry 10(2):123–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernbach PM, Rogers T, Fox CR, Sloman SA (2013) Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding. Psych. Sci. 24(6):939–946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons GJ, Hutchinson JW, Williams P, Alba JW, Chartrand TL, Huber J, Tavassoli NT (2002) Non-conscious influences on consumer choice. Marketing Lett. 13(3):269–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey D (1986) Recent research on selective exposure to information. Adv. Experimental Soc. Psych. 19:41–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giambra LM (1995) A laboratory method for investigating influences on switching attention to task-unrelated imagery and thought. Consciousness Cognition 4(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gough HG (1979) A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(8):1398–1405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gürçay-Morris B (2016). The use of alternative reasons in predictive judgment. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Hart W, Albarracín D, Eagly AH, Brechan I, Lindberg MJ, Merrill L (2009) Feeling validated vs. being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psych. Bull. 135(4):555–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber M, Van Boven L, Park B, Pizzi WT (2015) Seeing red: Anger increases how much republican identification predicts partisan attitudes and perceived polarization. PLoS One 10(9):e0139193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvis WBG, Petty RE (1996) The need to evaluate. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(1):172–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John OP, Srivastava S (1999) The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Pervin LA, Oliver JP, eds. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, vol. 2 (Guilford Press, New York), 102–138.Google Scholar
• Jonas E, Schulz-Hardt S, Frey D, Thelen N (2001) Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(4):557–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judd CM (1978) Cognitive effects of attitude conflict resolution. J. Conflict Resolution 22(3):483–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilmann RH, Thomas KW (1977) Developing a forced-choice measure of conflict-handling behavior: The “mode” instrument. Educational Psych. Measurement 37(2):309–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krosnick JA (1988) The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 55(2):196–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psych. Bull. 108(3):480–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laurin K (2018) Inaugurating rationalization: Three field studies find increased rationalization when anticipated realities become current. Psych. Sci. 29(4):483–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lauriola M, Foschi R, Mosca O, Weller J (2016) Attitude toward ambiguity: Empirically robust factors in self-report personality scales. Assessment 23(3):353–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner JS, Keltner D (2001) Fear, anger, and risk. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(1):146–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litman JA (2008) Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity. Personality Individual Differences 44(7):1585–1595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lord CG, Lepper MR, Preston E (1984) Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 47(6):1231–1243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lord CG, Ross L, Lepper MR (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(11):2098–2109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM (1996) Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psych. Methods 1(2):130–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mardia KV (1980) Tests of univariate and multivariate normality. Krishnaiah PR, ed. Handbook of Statistics (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 279–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGuire W (1968) Personality and attitude change: An information-processing theory. Greenwald AG, Brock TC, Ostrom TM, eds. Psychological Foundations of Attitudes (Academic Press, New York), 176–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGuire WJ (1969) The nature of attitudes and attitude change. Aronson E, Gardner L, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Boston), 136–314.Google Scholar
• Mill JS (1859) On Liberty (Savill, Edwards and Co. Printers, London).Google Scholar
• Mischel W, Shoda Y (1995) A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psych. Rev. 102(2):246–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muraven M, Baumeister RF (2000) Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psych. Bull. 126(2):247–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. General Psych. 2(2):175–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnaly JC (1978) Psychometric Theory (MacGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Oreg S (2003) Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):680–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perkins DN (1985) Postprimary education has little impact on informal reasoning. J. Educational Psych. 77(5):562–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1996) Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches (Westview Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2014) Political polarization and media habits. Pew Research Center Report, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Poole KT, Rosenthal H (1985) A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. Am. J. Political Sci. 29(2):357–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole KT, Rosenthal H (2000) Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Pronin E, Gilovich T, Ross L (2004) Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self vs. others. Psych. Rev. 111(3):781–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raskin R, Hall CS (1981) The narcissistic personality inventory: Alternative form reliability and further evidence of construct validity. J. Personality Assessment 45(2):159–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Risko EF, Anderson N, Sarwal A, Engelhardt M, Kingstone A (2012) Everyday attention: Variation in mind wander and memory in a lecture. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 26(2):234–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roets A, Van Hiel A (2011) Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure scale. Personality Individual Differences 50(1):90–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross L (1977) The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Adv. Experimental Soc. Psych. 10:173–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross L, Ward A (1995) Psychological barriers to dispute resolution. Adv. Experimental Soc. Psych. 27:255–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross L, Ward A (1996) Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. Reed ES, Turiel E, Brown T, eds. Values and Knowledge (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ), 103–135.Google Scholar
• Scopelliti I, Morewedge CK, McCormick E, Min HL, Lebrecht S, Kassam KS (2015) Bias blind spot: structure, measurement, and consequences. Management Sci. 61(10):2468–2486.Link, Google Scholar
• Seli P, Risko EF, Smilek D (2016) On the necessity of distinguishing between unintentional and intentional mind wandering. Psych. Sci. 27(5):685–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherif M, Harvey OJ, Hood W, Sherif CW, White J (1998) The Robbers Cave Experiment: Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation [Originally published as Intergroup Conflict and Group Relations] (Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CT).Google Scholar
• Smallwood J, Schooler JW (2006) The restless mind. Psych. Bull. 132(6):946–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smallwood J, O’Connor RC, Sudberry MV, Haskell C, Ballantyne C (2004) The consequences of encoding information on the maintenance of internally generated images and thoughts: The role of meaning complexes. Consciousness Cognition 13(4):789–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soldz S, Vaillant GE (1999) The Big Five personality traits and the life course: A 45-year longitudinal study. J. Res. Perspectives 33(2):208–232.Google Scholar
• Stanovich KE, West RF (1997) Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. J. Educational Psych. 89(2):342–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanovich KE, West RF, Toplak ME (2013) Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 22(4):259–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan JL, Transue JE (1999) The psychological underpinnings of democracy: A selective review of research on political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital. Annual Rev. Psych. 50(1):625–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H (1970) Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Sci. Am. 223(5):96–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner J (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Austin WG, Worchel S, eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Monterey, CA), 33–47.Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE (1986) A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 50(4):819–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Troldahl VC, Powell FA (1965) A short-form dogmatism scale for use in field studies. Soc. Forces 44(2):211–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webster DM, Kruglanski AW (1994) Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(6):1049–1062.Crossref, Google Scholar