Anticipatory Consumptions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3367

References

  • Amaldoss W, Jain S (2005) Pricing of conspicuous goods: A competitive analysis of social effects. J. Marketing Res. 42(1):30–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amaldoss W, Jain S (2008) Trading up: A strategic analysis of reference group effects. Marketing Sci. 27(5):932–942.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ariely D, Norton MI (2009) Conceptual consumption. Annual Rev. Psych. 60(1):475–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banks J, Blundell R, Tanner S (1998) Is there a retirement-savings puzzle? Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(4):769–788.Google Scholar
  • Baucells M, Bellezzab S (2017) Temporal profiles of instant utility during anticipation, event, and recall. Management Sci. 63(3):729–748.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brunnermeier MK, Parker JA (2005) Optimal expectations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(4):1092–1118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caplin A, Leahy J (2001) Psychological expected utility theory and anticipatory feelings. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):55–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Cui TH (2013) The benefit of uniform price for branded variants. Marketing Sci. 32(1):36–50.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cui TH, Raju JS, Zhang ZJ (2007) Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. 53(8):1303–1314.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gollier C, Muermann A (2010) Optimal choice and beliefs with ex ante savoring and ex post disappointment. Management Sci. 56(8):1272–1284.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guo L, Zhang J (2012) Consumer deliberation and product line design. Marketing Sci. 31(6):995–1007.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jain S (2009) Self-control and optimal goals: A theoretical analysis. Marketing Sci. 28(6):1027–1045.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jain S (2012) Marketing of vice goods: A strategic analysis of the package size decision. Marketing Sci. 31(1):36–51.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jouini E, Karehnke P, Napp C (2014) On portfolio choice with savoring and disappointment. Management Sci. 60(3):796–804.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuksov D, Villas-Boas MJ (2010) When more alternatives lead to less choice. Marketing Sci. 29(3):507–524.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):443–477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lim N (2010) Social loss aversion and optimal contest design. J. Marketing Res. 47(4):777–787.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lim N, Ho TH (2007) Designing price contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the number of blocks matter? Marketing Sci. 26(3):312–326.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Linville PW, Fischer GW (1991) Preferences for separating or combining events. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 60(1):5–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G (1987) Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption. Econom. J. 97(September):666–684.Google Scholar
  • Loewenstein G, Prelec D (1991) Negative time preference. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(2):347–352.Google Scholar
  • O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999) Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):103–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orhun AY (2009) Optimal product line design when consumers exhibit choice set-dependent preferences. Marketing Sci. 28(5):868–886.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pollak RA (1968) Consistent planning. Rev. Econom. Stud. 35(2):201–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shu SB, Gneezy A (2010) Procrastination of enjoyable experiences. J. Marketing Res. 47(5):933–944.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strotz RH (1956) Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econom. Stud. 23(3):165–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Syam N, Krishnamurthy P, Hess JD (2008) That’s what I thought I wanted? Miswanting and regret for a standard good in a mass-customized world. Marketing Sci. 27(3):379–397.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler RH (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. 4(3):199–214.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler RH, Johnson EJ (1990) Gambling with house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. 36(6):643–660.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.