Redesigning the Market for Volunteers: A Donor Registry

References

• Abdulkadiroglu A, Pathak PA, Roth AE (2005) The New York City high school match. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95:364–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdulkadiroglu A, Pathak PA, Roth AE (2009) Strategy-proofness versus efficiency in matching with indifferences: Redesigning the NYC high school match. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99:1954–1978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdulkadiroglu A, Sonmez T (2003) School choice: A mechanism design approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93:729–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1989) Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. J. Political Econom. 97:1447–1458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Vesterlund L (2001) Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quart. J. Econom. 116:293–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Brown E, Rischall I (2003) Charitable giving by married couples who decides and why does it matter? J. Human Resources 38:111–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Rao JM, Trachtman H (2017) Avoiding the ask: A field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving. J. Political Econom. 125:625–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaman AL, Cole CM, Preston M, Klentz B, Steblay NM (1983) Fifteen years of foot-in-the door research: A meta-analysis. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 9:181–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1974) A theory of social interactions. J. Political Econom. 82:1063–1093.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruhin A, Goette L, Roethlisberger A, Markovic A, Buchli R, Frey BM (2015) Call of duty: The effects of phone calls on blood donor motivation. Transfusion 55:2645–2652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Trost MR, Newsom JT (1995) Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69:318–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conlin M, Lynn M, O’Donoghue T (2003) The norm of restaurant tipping. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 52:297–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox JC, Deck CA (2006) When are women more generous than men? Econom. Inquiry 44:587–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Craig AC, Garbarino E, Heger SA, Slonim R (2016) Waiting to give: Stated and revealed preferences. Management Sci. 63:3672–3690.Link, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart. J. Econom. 127:1–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellavigna S, List JA, Malmendier U, Rao G (2013) The importance of being marginal: Gender differences in generosity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103:586–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dillard JP (1991) The current status of research on sequential-request compliance techniques. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 17:283–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Exley CL, Petrie R (2018) The impact of a surprise donation ask. J. Public Econom. 158:152–167.Google Scholar
• Freedman JL, Fraser SC (1966) Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 4:195–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gangadharan L, Grossman PJ, Jones K (2015) Donor types and paternalism. Department of Economics Discussion Paper, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
• Garbarino E, Slonim R, Wang C (2013) The multidimensional effects of a small gift: Evidence from a natural field experiment. Econom. Lett. 120:83–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Keenan EA, Gneezy A (2014) Avoiding overhead aversion in charity. Science 346:632–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goette L, Stutzer A (2008) Blood donations and incentives: Evidence from a field experiment. Technical report, IZA Discussion Papers.Google Scholar
• Gul F, Pesendorfer W (2001) Temptation and self-control. Econometrica 69:1403–1435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J. Econom. Lit. 42:1009–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamdar A, Levitt SD, List JA, Mullaney B, Syverson C (2015) Once and done: Leveraging behavioral economics to increase charitable contributions. SPI Working Paper 025, Science of Philanthropy Initiative, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2012) Will there be blood? Incentives and displacement effects in pro-social behavior. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 4:186–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2013) Economic rewards to motivate blood donations. Science 340:927–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2014) Rewarding volunteers: A field experiment. Management Sci. 60:1107–1129.Link, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (1984) The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents: A case study in game theory. J. Political Econom. 92:991–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (2008) What have we learned from market design? Econom. J. (London) 118:285–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Peranson E (1999) The redesign of the matching market for American physicians: Some engineering aspects of economic design. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89:748–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Sönmez T, Ünver MU (2004) Kidney exchange. Quart. J. Econom. 119:457–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Sönmez T, Ünver MU (2007) Efficient kidney exchange: Coincidence of wants in markets with compatibility-based preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97:828–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slonim R, Wang C (2017) Market design for altruistic supply: Evidence from the lab. Harvard Business School Research Paper 16–112, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Slonim R, Wang C, Garbarino E (2014) The market for blood. J. Econom. Perspect. 28:177–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun T, Lu SF, Jin GZ (2016) Solving shortage in a priceless market: Insights from blood donation. J. Health Econom. 48:149–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanaka T, Camerer CF, Nguyen Q (2016) Risk and time preferences: linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. Ikeda S, Kato HK, Ohtake F, Tsutsui Y, eds. Behavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness (Springer, Tokyo), 3–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tinkelman D, Mankaney K (2007) When is administrative efficiency associated with charitable donations? Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 36:41–64.Crossref, Google Scholar