Position Ranking and Auctions for Online Marketplaces

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3372

References

  • Aggarwal G, Feldman J, Muthukrishnan S, Pál M (2008) Sponsored search auctions with markovian users. Internat. Workshop Internet Network Econom. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 621–628.Google Scholar
  • Aouad A, Farias V, Levi R (2017) Assortment optimization under consider-then-choose choice models Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
  • Archer A, Tardos E (2001) Truthful mechanisms for one-parameter agents. Proc. 42nd IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci., Newport Beach, CA, 482–492.Google Scholar
  • Athey S, Ellison G (2011) Position auctions with consumer search. Quart. J. Econom. 126(3):1213–1270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Branco F, Sun M, Villas-Boas JM (2012) Optimal search for product information. Management Sci. 58(11):2037–2056.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cary M, Das A, Edelman B, Giotis I, Heimerl K, Karlin AR, Mathieu C, Schwarz M (2008) On best-response bidding in GSP auction. NBER Working Paper No. 13788, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Chan TY, Park YH (2015) Consumer search activities and the value of ad positions in sponsored search advertising. Marketing Sci. 34(4):606–623.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, He C (2011) Paid placement: Advertising and search on the Internet. Econom. J. (London) 121(556):309–328.Google Scholar
  • Chen Y, Yao S (2017) Sequential search with refinement: Model and application with click-stream data. Management Sci. 63(12):4345–4365.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis JM, Gallego G, Topaloglu H (2014) Assortment optimization under variants of the nested logit model. Oper. Res. 62(2):250–273.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dukes A, Liu L (2016) Online shopping intermediaries: The strategic design of search environments. Management Sci. 62(4):1064–1077.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman B, Ostrovsky M, Schwarz M (2007) Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(1):242–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feng J, Bhargava HK, Pennock DM (2007) Implementing sponsored search in web search engines: Computational evaluation of alternative mechanisms. INFORMS J. Comput. 19(1):137–148.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Golrezaei N, Nazerzadeh H, Rusmevichientong P (2014) Real-time optimization of personalized assortments. Management Sci. 60(6):1532–1551.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Groves T (1973) Incentive in teams. Econometrica 41(3):617–631.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR (2014) Consideration-set heuristics. J. Bus. Res. 67(8):1688–1699.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hummel P, McAfee RP (2014) Position auctions with externalities. Liu T-Y, Qi Q, Ye Y, eds. Web Internet Econom.: 10th Internat. Conf. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 417–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeziorski P, Segal I (2015) What makes them click: Empirical analysis of consumer demand for search advertising. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 7(3):24–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ke TT, Shen ZJM, Villas-Boas JM (2016) Search for information on multiple products. Management Sci. 62(12):3576–3603.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kempe D, Mahdian M (2008) A cascade model for externalities in sponsored search. Papadimitriou C, Zhang S, eds. Internet Network Econom.: 4th Internat. Workshop (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 585–596.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim JB, Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ (2010) Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1001–1023.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kominers SD, Zhou Y (2009) Dynamic position auctions with consumer search. Goldberg AV, Zhou Y, eds. Algorithmic Aspects Inform. Management: 5th Internat. Conf. (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 240–250.Google Scholar
  • L’Ecuyer P, Maillé P, Stier-Moses NE, Tuffin B (2017) Revenue-maximizing rankings for online platforms with quality-sensitive consumers. Oper. Res. 65(2):408–423.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li G, Rusmevichientong P, Topaloglu H (2015) The d-level nested logit model: Assortment and price optimization problems. Oper. Res. 63(2):325–342.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lucier B, Paes Leme R, Tardos E (2012) On revenue in the generalized second price auction. Proc. 21st Internat. Conf. World Wide Web, Lyon, France, 361–370.Google Scholar
  • Merkle (2018) Merkle’s digital marketing report for q4 2018. Accessed April 3, 2019, https://www.merkleinc.com/thought-leadership/digital-marketing-report.Google Scholar
  • Moscarini G, Smith L (2001) The optimal level of experimentation. Econometrica 69(6):1629–1644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myerson R (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (2009) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Nisan N, Roughgarden T, Tardos E, Vazirani VV (2007) Algorithmic Game Theory (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Payne JW (1976) Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(2):366–387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts J, Lattin M (1991) Development and testing of a model consideration set composition. J. Marketing Res. 28(4):429–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sullivan L (2016) Amazon sponsored products drive 1.5 billion dollars in sales. Accessed May 9, 2019, http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/265989/amazon-sponsored-products-drive-15-billion-in-sa.html.Google Scholar
  • Talluri K, van Ryzin G (2004) Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Management Sci. 50(1):15–33.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Train K (2002) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ulu C, Honhon D, Alptekinoğlu A (2012) Learning consumer tastes through dynamic assortments. Oper. Res. 60(4):833–849.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ursu RM (2018) The power of rankings: Qualifying the effects of rankings on online consumer search and purchase decisions. Marketing Sci. 37(4):530–552.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • van Ryzin G, Mahajan S (1999) On the relationship between inventory costs and variety benefits in retail assortments. Management Sci. 45(11):1496–1509.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Varian HR (2007) Position auctions. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 25(6):1163–1178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang R, Sahin O (2018) The impact of consumer search cost on assortment planning and pricing. Management Sci. 64(8):3649–3666.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weitzman M (1979) Optimal search for the best alternatives. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolinsky A (1986) True monopolistic competition as a result of imperfect information. Quart. J. Econom. 101(3):493–511.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yao S, Mela CF (2011) A dynamic model of sponsored search advertising. Marketing Sci. 30(3):447–468.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.