Informational Complementarity

References

• Anderson ET, Simester D (2013) Advertising in a competitive market: The role of product standards, customer learning, and switching costs. J. Marketing Res. 50(4):489–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, Renault R (1999) Pricing, product diversity, and search costs: A bertrand-chamberlin-diamond model. RAND J. Econom. 30(4):719–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, Renault R (2006) Advertising content. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2017) Ordered consumer search. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 15(5):1–36.Google Scholar
• Armstrong M, Zhou J (2011) Paying for prominence. Econom. J. (London) 121(556):F368–F395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M, Vickers J, Zhou J (2009) Prominence and consumer search. RAND J. Econom. 40(2):209–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bar-Isaac H, Caruana G, Cuñat V (2012) Search, design, and market structure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(2):1140–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branco F, Sun M, Miguel Villas-Boas J (2012) Optimal search for product information. Management Sci. 58(11):2037–2056.Link, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Kim JB, Mela CF (2016) Zooming in on choice: How do consumers search for cameras online? Marketing Sci. 35(5):693–712.Link, Google Scholar
• Cabral LMB (2000) Stretching firm and brand reputation. RAND J. Econom. 31(4):658–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi JP (1998) Brand extension as informational leverage. Rev. Econom. Stud. 65(4):655–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi M, Dai AY, Kim K (2018) Consumer search and price competition. Econometrica 86(4):1257–1281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamond PA (1971) A model of price adjustment. J. Econom. Theory. 3(2):156–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doval L (2018) Whether or not to open Pandora’s box. J. Econom. Theory 175:127–158.Google Scholar
• Erdem T (1998) An empirical analysis of umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. 35(3):339–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Keane MP (1996) Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. 15(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Fosgerau M, Melo E, de Palma A, Shum M (2017) Discrete choice and rational inattention: A general equivalence result. Working paper, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
• Garcia D, Shelegia S (2018) Consumer search with observational learning. RAND J. Econom. 49(1):224–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentzkow M (2007) Valuing new goods in a model with complementarity: Online newspapers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):713–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittins JC, Jones DM (1974) A dynamic allocation index for the sequential design of experiments. Gani JM, Sarkadi K, Vincze I, eds. Progress in Statistics (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 241–266.Google Scholar
• Hendel I (1999) Estimating multiple-discrete choice models: An application to computerization returns. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(2):423–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks K, Sorensen A (2009) Information and the skewness of music sales. J. Political Econom. 117(2):324–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janakiraman R, Sismeiro C, Dutta S (2009) Perception spillovers across competing brands: A disaggregate model of how and when. J. Marketing Res. 46(4):467–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janssen M, Ke TT (2019) Searching for service. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconom. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Ke TT, Villas-Boas JM (2019) Optimal learning before choice. J. Econom. Theory 180:383–437.Google Scholar
• Ke TT, Shen Z-JM, Villas-Boas JM (2016) Search for information on multiple products. Management Sci. 62(12):3576–3603.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D (2004) Buyer search costs and endogenous product design. Marketing Sci. 23(4):490–499.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D, Villas-Boas JM (2010) When more alternatives lead to less choice. Marketing Sci. 29(3):507–524.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis R, Nguyen D (2015) Display advertising’s competitive spillovers to consumer search. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(2):93–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin S, Zhang J, John R (2015) Hauser. Learning from experience, simply. Marketing Sci. 34(1):1–19.Link, Google Scholar
• Luce DR (1959) Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Manski CF, Sherman L (1980) An empirical analysis of household choice among motor vehicles. Transportation Res. Part A: General 14(5–6):349–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayzlin D, Shin J (2011) Uninformative advertising as an invitation to search. Marketing Sci. 30(4):666–685.Link, Google Scholar
• McCall JJ (1970) Economics of information and job search. Quart. J. Econom. 84(1):113–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1978) Modeling the choice of residential location. Transportation Res. Record 673:72–77.Google Scholar
• Sahni NS (2016) Advertising spillovers: Evidence from online field experiments and implications for returns on advertising. J. Marketing Res. 53(4):459–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro BT (2018) Positive spillovers and free riding in advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals: The case of antidepressants. J. Political Econom. 126(1):381–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl DO (1989) Oligopolistic pricing with sequential consumer search. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(4):700–712.Google Scholar
• Train KE, McFadden DL, Ben-Akiva M (1987) The demand for local telephone service: A fully discrete model of residential calling patterns and service choices. RAND J. Econom. 18(1):109–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A (1977) Features of similarity. Psych. Rev. 84(4):327–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1988) Umbrella branding as a signal of new product quality: An example of signalling by posting a bond. RAND J. Econom. 19(3):458–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolinsky A (1986) True monopolistic competition as a result of imperfect information. Quart. J. Econom. 101(3):493–511.Crossref, Google Scholar