How Do Travel Costs Shape Collaboration?

References

• Adams JD, Black GC, Clemmons JR, Stephan PE (2005) Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from US universities, 1981–1999. Res. Policy 34(3):259–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Goldfarb A (2008) Restructuring research: Communication costs and the democratization of university innovation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(4):1578–1590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Catalini C, Goldfarb A (2015) Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(2):253–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein S, Giroud X, Townsend RR (2016) The impact of venture capital monitoring. J. Finance 71(4):1591–1622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikard M, Murray F, Gans S (2015) Exploring trade-offs in the organization of scientific work: Collaboration and scientific reward. Management Sci. 61(7):1473–1495.Link, Google Scholar
• Blum BS, Goldfarb A (2006) Does the internet defy the law of gravity? J. Internat. Econom. 70(2):384–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borenstein S, Rose NL (2007) How airline markets work…or do they? Regulatory reform in the airline industry. NBER Working Paper 13452, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Guinan EC, Lakhani K, Riedl C (2016) Looking across and looking beyond the knowledge frontier: Intellectual distance, novelty, and resource allocation in science. Management Sci. 62(10):2765–2783.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Brady T, Ganguli I, Gaule P, Guinan E, Hollenberg T, Lakhani K (2017) A field experiment on search costs and the formation of scientific collaborations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(4):565–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cairncross F (1997) The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution Will Change Our Lives (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Campos R, de Leon F, McQuillin B (2018) Lost in the storm: The academic collaborations that went missing in Hurricane Isaac. Econom. J. 128(610):995–1018.Google Scholar
• Catalini C (2018) Microgeography and the direction of inventive activity. Management Sci. 64(9):4348–4364.Link, Google Scholar
• Chai S, Freeman R (2018) Knowledge spillover and collaboration through temporary colocation. Working paper, ESSEC Business School, Cergy Pontoise, France.Google Scholar
• Criscuolo P, Dahlander L, Grohsjean T, Salter A (2017) Evaluating novelty: The role of panels in the selection of R&D projects. Acad. Management J. 60(2):433–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding WW, Levin SG, Stephan PE, Winkler AE (2010) The impact of information technology on academic scientists’ productivity and collaboration patterns. Management Sci. 56(9):1439–1461.Link, Google Scholar
• Dióspatonyi I, Horvai G, Braun T (2001) Publication speed in analytical chemistry journals. J. Chemical Inform. Comput. Sci. 41(6):1452–1456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk-Krzesinski HJ, Contractor N, Fiore SM, Hall KL, Kane C, Keyton J, Thompson Klein J, Spring B, Stokols D, Trochim W (2011) Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science. Res. Evaluation 20(2):145–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Zeebroeck NV (2012) From wires to partners: How the internet has fostered R&D collaborations within firms. Management Sci. 58(8):1549–1568.Link, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2005) How did location affect adoption of the commercial Internet? Global village vs. urban leadership. J. Urban Econom. 58(3):389–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman RB, Ganguli I, Murciano-Goroff R (2014) Why and wherefore of increased scientific collaboration. NBER Working Paper 19819, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Friedman TL (2005) The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Furman JL, Teodoridis F (2017) The cost of research tools and the direction of innovation: Evidence from computer science and electrical engineering. Working paper, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Gaspar J, Glaeser EL (1998) Information technology and the future of cities. J. Urban Econom. 43(1):136–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goolsbee A, Syverson C (2008) How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? Evidence from the major airlines. Quart. J. Econom. 123(4):1611–1633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamermesh D, Oster S (2002) Tools or toys? The impact of high technology on scholarly productivity. Econom. Inquiry 40(4):539–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones BF (2009) The burden of knowledge and the death of the renaissance man: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):283–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones BF, Wuchty S, Uzzi B (2008) Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography and stratification in science. Science 322(5905):1259–1262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim EH, Morse A, Zingales L (2009) Are elite universities losing their competitive edge? J. Financial Econom. 93(3):353–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kremer M (1993) The O-ring theory of economic development. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):551–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leamer EE, Levinsohn J (1995) International trade theory: The evidence. Grossman GM, Rogoff K, eds. Handbook of International Economics, vol. 3 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1339–1394.Google Scholar
• Milojević S (2014) Principles of scientific research team formation and evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(11):3984–3989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison SA (2001) Actual, adjacent, and potential competition: Estimating the full effect of Southwest Airlines. J. Transportation Econom. Policy 35(2):239–256.Google Scholar
• National Academies (2004) Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (2015) Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities: 2014. Special Report NSF 16-300, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
• Perry MJ (2014) The cost of air travel in the US has been remarkably stable for the last decade, and 17% cheaper than 20 years ago. Carpe Diem (blog), February 12, https://www.aei.org/publication/the-cost-of-air-travel-in-the-us-has-been-remarkably-stable-for-the-last-decade-and-17-cheaper-than-20-years-ago/.Google Scholar
• Polanyi M (1958) Personal Knowledge: Toward a Post-Critical Philosophy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt T, Mobius M (2004) Getting closer or drifting apart? Quart. J. Econom. 119(3):971–1009.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2001) The determinants of agglomeration. J. Urban Econom. 50(2):191–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Haeussler C (2017) Authorship and contribution disclosures. Sci. Adv. 3(11):e1700404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephan PE (2012) How Economics Shapes Science (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Storper M, Venables AJ (2004) Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. J. Econom. Geography 4(4):351–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teodoridis F (2018) Understanding team knowledge production: The interrelated roles of technology and expertise. Management Sci. 64(8):3625–3648.Link, Google Scholar
• Transportation Research Board, National Research Council (1999) Entry and Competition in the US Airline Industry: Issues and Opportunities (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E (1994) “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. 40(4):429–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP, Lee Y-N (2015) The bureaucratization of science. Res. Policy 44(8):1584–1600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang J, Veugelers R, Stephan P (2017) Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators. Res. Policy 46(8):1416–1436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu L, Wang D, Evans JA (2019) Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature 566(7744):378–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar