Bridging Academia and Industry: How Geographic Hubs Connect University Science and Corporate Technology

References

• Agrawal A (2006) Engaging the inventor: Exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge. Strategic Management J. 27(1):63–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Henderson RM (2002) Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Sci. 48(1):44–60.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Goldfarb A, Teodoridis F (2016) Understanding the changing structure of scientific inquiry. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 8(1):100–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahmadpoor M, Jones BF (2017) The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance. Science 357(6351):583–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Chung W (2007) Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Sci. 53(5):760–776.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A (1994) The changing technology of technological change: General and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Res. Policy 23(5):523–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A (2018) The decline of science in corporate R&D. Strategic Management J. 39(1):3–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Stuart T, Wang Y (2013) Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Sci. 60(1):92–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Begley CG, Ellis LM (2012) Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 483(7391):531–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belenzon S, Schankerman M (2013) Spreading the word: Geography, policy, and knowledge spillovers. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(3):884–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bena J, Li K (2014) Corporate innovations and mergers and acquisitions. J. Finance 69(5):1923–1960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikard M (2012) Simultaneous discoveries as a research tool: Method and promise. Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bikard M (2018) Made in academia: The effect of institutional origin on inventors’ attention to science. Organ. Sci. 29(5):818–836.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikard M, Vakili K, Teodoridis F (2019) When collaboration bridges institutions: The impact of university–industry collaboration on academic productivity. Organ. Sci. 30(2):426–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Brady T, Ganguli I, Gaule P, Guinan E, Hollenberg A, Lakhani KR (2017) A field experiment on search costs and the formation of scientific collaborations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(4):565–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bush V (1945) Science: The endless frontier. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. 48(3):231–64.Google Scholar
• Callaert J, Pellens M, Van Looy B (2014) Sources of inspiration? Making sense of scientific references in patents. Scientometrics 98(3):1617–1629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Veugelers R, Zuniga P (2008) In search of performance effects of (in)direct industry science links. Indust. Corporate Change 17(4):611–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chai S, Menon A (2019) Breakthrough recognition: Bias against novelty and competition for attention. Res. Policy 48(3):733–47.Google Scholar
• Chai S, Shih W (2016) Bridging science and technology through academic–industry partnerships. Res. Policy 45(1):148–58.Google Scholar
• Chai S, Suchyta M, Freeman RB (2014) Conferences as a vehicle for collaborative discovery and innovation. Acad. Management Proc. 2014(1):16246.Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Nelson R, Walsh J (2002) Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Sci. 48(1):1–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Cozzens SE (1989) Social Control and Multiple Discovery in Science: The Opiate Receptor Case (State University of New York Press, Albany).Google Scholar
• D’Este P, Perkmann M (2011) Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. J. Tech. Transfer 36(3):316–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drivas K, Lei Z, Wright BD (2017) Academic patent licenses: Roadblocks or signposts for nonlicensee cumulative innovation? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 137(May):282–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans JA (2010) Industry induces academic science to know less about more. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(2):389–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fini R, Rasmussen E, Wiklund J, Wright M (2019) Theories from the lab: How research on science commercialization can contribute to management studies. J. Management Stud. 56(5):865–894.Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25:909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Greene H, Li G, Marx M, Yao D (2019) Government-funded research increasingly fuels innovation. Science 364(6446):1139–1141.Google Scholar
• Freedman LP, Cockburn IM, Simcoe TS (2015) The economics of reproducibility in preclinical research. PLoS Biol. 13(6):e1002165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman J, MacGarvie MJ (2007) Academic science and the birth of industrial research laboratories in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 63(4):756–776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittelman M (2007) Does geography matter for science-based firms? Epistemic communities and the geography of research and patenting in biotechnology. Organ. Sci. 18(4):724–741.Link, Google Scholar
• Gittelman M, Kogut B (2003) Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Sci. 49(4):366–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldwasser E (2011) A Bloody Long Journey (Xlibris, Bloomington, IN).Google Scholar
• Halim N (2000) Bridging apoptotic signaling gaps. Scientist (August 21), https://www.the-scientist.com/hot-paper/bridging-apoptotic-signaling-gaps-55661.Google Scholar
• Hartshorne JK, Schachner A (2012) Tracking replicability as a method of post-publication open evaluation. Frontiers Comput. Neurosci. 6:Article 8, https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrekson M, Rosenberg N (2001) Designing efficient institutions for science-based entrepreneurship: Lesson from the US and Sweden. J. Tech. Transfer 26(3):207–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iaria A, Schwarz C, Waldinger F (2018) Frontier knowledge and scientific production: Evidence from the collapse of international science. Quart. J. Econom. 133(2):927–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jinha AE (2010) Article 50 million: An estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence. Learned Publishing 23(3):258–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones B (2009) The burden of knowledge and the ‘death of the Renaissance man’: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):283–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leahey E (2007) Not by productivity alone: How visibility and specialization contribute to academic earnings. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(4):533–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemley MA, Sampat B (2011) Examiner characteristics and patent office outcomes. Rev. Econom. Statist. 94(3):817–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li D, Azoulay P, Sampat BN (2017) The applied value of public investments in biomedical research. Science 356(6333):78–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marshall A (1890) Principles of Economics (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Marx M, Fuegi A (2019) Reliance on Science in Patenting (Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1961) Singletons and multiples in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 105(5):470–486.Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159(3810):56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mokyr J (2002) The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Murray F (2002) Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering. Res. Policy 31(8–9):1389–1403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F (2010) The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(September):341–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R (1982) The role of knowledge in R&D efficiency. Quart. J. Econom. 97(3):453–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18:187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (2010) Attention to sttention. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1286–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Osherovich L (2011) Hedging against academic risk. Sci.-Bus. eXchange 4(15):416.Google Scholar
• Podolny JM, Stuart TE, Hannan MT (1996) Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984-1991. Amer. J. Sociol. 102(3):659–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polidoro F (2013) The competitive implications of certifications: The effects of scientific and regulatory certifications on entries into new technical fields. Acad. Management J. 56(2):597–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reschke BP, Azoulay P, Stuart TE (2018) Status spillovers: The effect of status-conferring prizes on the allocation of attention. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):819–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach M, Cohen WM (2013) Lens or prism? Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows from public research. Management Sci. 59(2):504–525.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N, Nelson R (1994) American universities and technical advance in industry. Res. Policy 23(3):323–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt M (2016) An incentive-based approach for improving data reproducibility. Sci. Translational Medicine 8(336):336ed5.Google Scholar
• Saxenian A (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Simcoe TS, Waguespack DM (2011) Status, quality, and attention: What’s in a (missing) name? Management Sci. 57(2):274–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon H (1947) Administrative Behavior (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Singh J (2005) Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Sci. 51(5):756–770.Link, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Marx M (2013) Geographic constraints on knowledge spillovers: Political borders vs. spatial proximity. Management Sci. 59(9):2056–2078.Link, Google Scholar
• Sohn E (2014) The endogeneity of academic science to local industrial R&D. Acad. Management Proc. (1):11413.Google Scholar
• Stern S (2004) Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Sci. 50(6):835–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Stokes DE (1997) Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Teodoridis F, Bikard M, Vakili K (2018) Creativity at the knowledge frontier: The impact of specialization in fast- and slow-paced domains. Admin. Sci. Quart., ePub ahead of print July 30, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218793384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1994) “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. 40(4):429–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Armstrong JS (2002) Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Sci. 48(1):138–153.Link, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Brewer MB (1998) Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):290–306.Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW, Kim TY (2003) The critical trade-off: Identity assignment and box-office success in the feature film industry. Indust. Corporate Change 12(1):27–67.Crossref, Google Scholar