You’ve Got Mail: A Randomized Field Experiment on Tax Evasion

References

• Allingham MG, Sandmo A (1972) Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. J. Public Econom. 1(3–4):323–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alm J, Torgler B (2006) Culture differences and tax morale in the United States and in Europe. J. Econom. Psych. 27(2):224–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alm J, McClelland GH, Schulze WD (1992) Why do people pay taxes? J. Public Econom. 48(1):21–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alm J, Sanchez I, de Juan A (1995) Economic and noneconomic factors in tax compliance. Kyklos 48(1):3–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Miller J (2002) Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica 70(2):737–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Erard B, Feinstein J (1998) Tax compliance. J. Econom. Literature 36(2):818–860.Google Scholar
• Ariel B (2012) Deterrence and moral persuasion effects on corporate tax compliance: Findings from a randomized controlled trial. Criminology 50(1):27–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Artavanis N, Morse A, Tsoutsoura M (2016) Measuring income tax evasion using bank credit: Evidence from Greece. Quart. J. Econom. 131(2):739–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartke S, Friedl A, Gelhaar F, Reh L (2017) Social comparison nudges—Guessing the norm increases charitable giving. Econom. Lett. 152:73–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumenthal M, Christian C, Slemrod J (2001) Do normative appeals affect tax compliance? Evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota. National Tax J. 54(1):125–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dal Bó E, Dal Bó P (2009) “Do the right thing:” The effects of moral suasion on cooperation. J. Public Econom. 117(1):28–38.Google Scholar
• Bobek DD, Hatfield RC (2003) An investigation of the theory of planned behavior and the role of moral obligation in tax compliance. Behav. Res. Accounting 15(1):13–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):166–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryan CJ, Adams GS, Monin B (2012) When cheating would make you a cheater: Implicating the self prevents unethical behaviour. J. Experiment. Psych. General 142(4):1001–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Hole AD, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2007) The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):818–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Moene KO, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2013) Needs versus entitlements: An international fairness experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):574–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Nygaard K, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2015) Social preferences in the lab: A comparison of students and a representative population. Scandinavian J. Econom. 117(4):1306–1326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castro L, Scartascini C (2015) Tax compliance and enforcement in the Pampas—Evidence from a field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 116(1):65–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cebula RJ, Feige EL (2012) America’s unreported economy: Measuring the size, growth and determinants of income tax evasion in the U.S. Crime Law Soc. Change 57(3):265–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quart. J. Econom. 117(3):817–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chetty R, Looney A, Kroft K (2009) Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1145–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cobham A, Jansky P (2018) Global distribution of revenue loss from corporate tax avoidance: re-estimation and country results. J. Internat. Development 30(2):206–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman S (1996) The Minnesota income tax compliance experiment: State tax results. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper 4827, University Library of Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Coleman S (2007) The Minnesota income tax compliance experiment: Replication of the social norms experiment. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper 5820, University Library of Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Cullis JG, Lewis A (1997) Why people pay taxes: From a conventional economic model to a model of social convention. J. Econom. Psych. 18(2–3):305–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Del Carpio L (2013) Are the neighbours cheating? Evidence from a social norm experiment on property taxes in Peru. Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Drouvelis M, Grosskopf B (2016) The effects of induced emotions on pro-social behaviour. J. Public Econom. 134(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dulleck U, Fooken J, Newton C, Ristl A, Schaffner M, Torgler B (2016) Tax compliance and psychic costs: Behavioral experimental evidence using a physiological marker. J. Public Econom. 134:9–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dwenger N, Kleven H, Rasul I, Rincke J (2016) Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations for tax compliance: Evidence from a field experiment in Germany. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 8(3):203–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelmann D, Strobel M (2004) Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):857–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engström P, Holmlund B (2009) Tax evasion and self-employment in a high-tax country: Evidence from Sweden. Appl. Econom. 41(19):2419–2430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erat S, Gneezy U (2012) White lies. Management Sci. 58(4):723–733.Link, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Gächter S (1998) Reciprocity and economics: The economic implications of Homo Reciprocans. Eur. Econom. Rev. 42(3–5):845–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Glätzle-Rützler D, Sutter M (2013) The development of egalitarianism, altruism, spite and parochialism in childhood and adolescence. Eur. Econom. Rev. 64(1):369–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feld LP, Frey BS (2007) Tax compliance as the result of a psychological tax contract: The role of incentives and responsive regulation. Law Policy 29(1):102–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fellner G, Sausgruber R, Traxler C (2013) Testing enforcement strategies in the field: Threat, moral appeals and social information. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):634–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss C, Thorsager M, Olsen Ø (2015) Ny måte å kontrollere selvangivelsen på—fra fokus på enkeltposter til skattytere som gjør feil [in Norwegian]. Skatteetatens Analysenytt 5(1):6–9.Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (2005) Deception: The role of consequences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(1):384–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2000) Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):791–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graetz MJ, Reinganum JF, Wilde LL (1986) The tax compliance game: Toward an interactive theory of law enforcement. J. Law Econom. Organ. 2(1):1–32.Google Scholar
• Hallsworth M (2014) The use of field experiments to increase tax compliance. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 30(4):658–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallsworth M, List JA, Metcalf RD, Vlaev I (2017) The behavioralist as tax collector: Using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance. J. Public Econom. 148(1):14–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirchler E (2007) The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirchler E, Hoelzl E, Wahl I (2008) Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. J. Econom. Psych. 29(2):210–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleven HJ, Knudsen MB, Kreiner CT, Pedersen S, Saez E (2011) Unwilling or unable to cheat? Evidence from a tax audit experiment in Denmark. Econometrica 79(3):651–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konow J (2000) Fair shares: Accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):1072–1091.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krupka E, Weber R (2009) The focusing and informational effects of norms on pro-social behavior. J. Econom. Psych. 30(3):307–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamberton C, De Neve J-E, Norton MI (2018) The power of voice in stimulating morality: Eliciting taxpayer preferences increases tax compliance. J. Consumer Psych. 28(2):310–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, List JA (2007) What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? J. Econom. Perspectives 21(2):153–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luttmer, EP, Singhal M (2014) Tax morale. J. Econom. Perspectives 28(4):149–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1997) Monotone treatment response. Econometrica 65(6):1311–1334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mascagni G (2018) From the lab to the field: A review of tax experiments. J. Econom. Surveys 32(2):273–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pomeranz D (2015) No taxation without information: Deterrence and self-enforcement in the value added tax. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(8):2539–2569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandmo A (2005) The theory of tax evasion: A retrospective view. National Tax J. 58(4):643–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandmo A (2012) An evasive topic: Theorizing about the hidden economy. Internat. Tax Public Finance 19(1):5–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slemrod J (2007) Cheating ourselves: The economics of tax evasion. J. Econom. Perspectives 21(1):25–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slemrod J, Yitzhaki S (2002) Tax avoidance, evasion, and administration. Auerbach AJ, Feldstein M, eds. Handbook of Public Economics, vol. 3 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1423–1470.Google Scholar
• Slemrod J, Blumenthal M, Christian C (2001) Taxpayer response to an increased probability of audit: Evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota. J. Public Econom. 79(3):455–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staub KE (2014) A causal interpretation of extensive and intensive margin effects in generalized Tobit models. Rev. Econom. Statist. 96(2):371–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torgler B (2002) Speaking to theorists and searching for facts: Tax morale and tax compliance in experiments. J. Econom. Surveys 16(5):657–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torgler B (2004) Moral suasion: An alternative tax policy strategy? Evidence from a controlled field experiment in Switzerland. Econom. Governance 5(3):235–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torgler B (2007) Tax Compliance and Tax Morale: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wenzel M (2004) An analysis of norm processes in tax compliance. J. Econom. Psych. 25(2):213–228.Crossref, Google Scholar