How Stress Affects Performance and Competitiveness Across Gender

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3400

References

  • Allen AP, Kennedy PJ, Cryan JF, Dinan TG, Clarke G (2014) Biological and psychological markers of stress in humans: Focus on the Trier Social Stress Test. Neuroscience Biobehavior Rev. 38:94–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almås I, Cappelen AW, Salvanes KG, Sørensen EO, Tungodden B (2016) Willingness to compete: Family matters. Management Sci. 62(8):2149–2162.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Angelucci M, Córdova M (2014) Productivity and choice under stress: Are men and women different? Accessed June 24, 2019, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Productivity-and-Choice-Under-Stress-%3A-Are-Men-and-Angelucci-Cordova/3621386a1d6cc61c45d441fcb21aee194df065d8#citing-papers.Google Scholar
  • Apicella CL, Dreber A, Gray PB, Hoffman M, Little AC, Campbell BC (2011) Androgens and competitiveness in men. J. Neuroscience Psych. Econom. 4(1):54–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariely D, Gneezy U, Loewenstein G, Mazar N (2009) Large stakes and big mistakes. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(2):451–469.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashraf N, Bandiera O, Lee S (2014) Awards unbundled: Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 100(April):44–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azmat G, Calsamiglia C, Iriberri N (2016) Gender differences in response to big stakes. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 14(6):1372–1400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum A, Grunberg NE (1997) Measuring stress hormones. Cohen S, Kessler RC, Gordon LU, eds. Measuring Stress: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 175–192.Google Scholar
  • Beilock SL (2008) Math performance in stressful situations. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 17(5):339–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beilock SL, Holt LE, Kulp CA, Carr TH (2004) More on the fragility of performance: Choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving. J. Experiment. Psych. General 133(4):584–600.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Booth A, Nolen P (2012) Choosing to compete: How different are girls and boys? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 81(2):542–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buckert M, Schwieren C, Kudielka BM, Fiebach CJ (2017) How stressful are economic competitions in the laboratory? An investigation with physiological measures. J. Econom. Psych. 62:231–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buser T, Dreber A, Mollerstrom J (2017) The impact of stress on tournament entry. Experiment. Econom. 20(2):506–530.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buser T, Niederle M, Oosterbeek H (2014) Gender, competitiveness and career choices. Quart. J. Econom. 129(3):1409–1447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cahlíková J, Cingl L (2017) Risk preferences under acute stress. Experiment. Econom. 20(1):209–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron A, Gelbach J, Miller D (2008) Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90(3):414–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cannon WB (1932) The wisdom of the body. Amer. J. Medicine Sci. 184(6):864.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Card D, Cardoso AR, Kline P (2016) Bargaining, sorting and the gender wage gap: Quantifying the impact of firms on the relative pay of women. Quart. J. Econom. 131(2):633–686.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeCaro MS, Thomas RD, Albert NB, Beilock SL (2011) Choking under pressure: Multiple routes to skill failure. J. Experiment. Psych. General 140(3):390–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dickerson SS, Kemeny ME (2004) Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psych. Bull. 130(3):355–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dohmen BT, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U (2010) Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability? Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(3):1238–1260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dohmen TJ (2008) Do professionals choke under pressure? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 65(3–4):636–653.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dreber A, von Essen E, Ranehill E (2011) Outrunning the gender gap — boys and girls compete equally. Experiment. Econom. 14(4):567–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Everly GS, Lating JM (2013) The Anatomy and Physiology of the Human Stress Response: A Clinical Guide to the Treatment of the Human Stress Response (Springer, New York), 17–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 41(4):1149–1160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischbacher U (2007) Z-TREE: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fletcher TD, Major D, Davis DD (2008) The interactive relationship of competitive climate and trait competitiveness with workplace attitudes, stress, and performance. J. Organ. Behav. 29(7):899–922.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flory JA, Leibbrandt A, List JA (2015) Do competitive work places deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on gender differences in job-entry decisions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(1):122–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2004) Gender and competition at a young age. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):377–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Leonard KL, List JA (2009) Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica 77(5):1637–1664.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1049–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Pietrasz A, Saccardo S (2018) On the size of the gender difference in competitiveness. Management Sci. 64(4):1541–1554.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goette L, Bendahan S, Thoresen J, Hollis F, Sandi C (2015) Stress pulls us apart: Trait anxiety modulates self-confidence under stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 54:115–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein DS, McEwen B (2002) Allostasis, homeostats, and the nature of stress. Stress 5(1):55–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greiner B (2004) An online recruitment system for economic experiments. Kremer K, Macho V, eds. Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen GWDG Bericht 63 (Ges. fur Wiss. Datenverarbeitung, Gottingen, Germany), 79–93.Google Scholar
  • Halko ML, Sääksvuori L (2017) Competitive behavior, stress, and gender. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 141:96–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haushofer J, Jang C (2015) Stress and temporal discounting: Do domains matter? Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  • Hellhammer DH, Wüst S, Kudielka BM (2009) Salivary cortisol as a biomarker in stress research. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34:163–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jurajda S, Munich D (2011) Gender gap in performance under competitive pressure: Admissions to Czech universities. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(3):514–518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kemeny ME (2003) The psychobiology of stress. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 12(4):124–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirschbaum C, Pirke KM, Hellhammer DH (1993) The Trier Social Stress Test—a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology 28(1-2):76–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Margittai Z, Strombach T, van Wingerden M, Joëls M, Schwabe L, Kalenscher T (2015) A friend in need: Time-dependent effects of stress on social discounting in men. Hormone Behav. 73:75–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McEwen BS (2012) Brain on stress: How the social environment gets under the skin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(Suppl 2):17180–17185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller R, Plessow F, Kirschbaum C, Stalder T (2013) Classification criteria for distinguishing cortisol responders from nonresponders to psychosocial stress: Evaluation of salivary cortisol pulse detection in panel designs. Psychosomatic Medicine 75(9):832–840.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nicolson NA (2008) Measurement of cortisol. Luecken LJ, Gallo LC, eds. Handbook of Physiological Research Methods in Health Psychology (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 37–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2010) Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition. J. Econom. Perspect. 24(2):129–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2011) Gender and competition. Annual Rev. Econom. 3(1):601–630.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ors E, Palomino F, Peyrache E (2013) Performance gender gap: Does competition matter? J. Labor Econom. 31(3):443–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pabst S, Brand M, Wolf OT (2013) Stress and decision making: A few minutes make all the difference. Behav. Brain Res. 250:39–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pruessner JC, Kirschbaum C, Meinlschmidt G, Hellhammer DH (2003) Two formulas for computation of the area under the curve represent measures of total hormone concentration vs. time-dependent change. Psychoneuroendocrinology 28(7):916–931.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schipper BC (2015) Sex hormones and competitive bidding. Management Sci. 61(2):249–266.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schmader T, Johns M, Forbes C (2008) An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psych. Rev. 115(2):336–356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schram A, Brandts J, Gerxhani K (2019) Social-status ranking: A hidden channel to gender inequality under competition. Experiment. Econom. 22(2):396–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spencer SJ, Steele CM, Quinn DM (1999) Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 35(1):4–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Starcke K, Brand M (2012) Decision making under stress: A selective review. Neuroscience Biobehavior Rev. 36(4):1228–1248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steyer R, Schwenkmezger P, Notz P, Eid M (1997) MDBF-Mehrdimensionaler Befindlichkeitsfragebogen (Hogrefe, Gottingen, Germany).Google Scholar
  • Sutter M, Glätzle-Rützler D (2015) Gender differences in the willingness to compete emerge early in life and persist. Management Sci. 61(10):2339–2354.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor SE (2006) Tend and befriend: Biobehavioral bases of affiliation under stress. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 15(6):273–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor SE, Klein LC, Lewis BP, Gruenewald TL, Gurung RA, Updegraff JA (2000) Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psych. Rev. 107(3):411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vinkers CH, Zorn JV, Cornelisse S, Koot S, Houtepen LC, Olivier B, Verster JC, et al.. (2013) Time-dependent changes in altruistic punishment following stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38:1467–1475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Dawans B, Kirschbaum C, Heinrichs M (2011) The Trier Social Stress Test for Groups (TSST-G): A new research tool for controlled simultaneous social stress exposure in a group format. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36(4):514–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Dawans B, Fischbacher U, Kirschbaum C, Fehr E, Heinrichs M (2012) The social dimension of stress reactivity: Acute stress increases prosocial behavior in humans. Psych. Sci. 23(6):651–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yerkes RM, Dodson JD (1908) The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. J. Comparative Neurology Psych. 18(5):459–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhong S, Shalev I, Koh D, Ebstein RP, Chew SH (2018) Competitiveness and Stress. Internat. Econom. Rev. 59(3):1263–1281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.