Capital Gains Overhang with a Dynamic Reference Point
Published Online:5 Feb 2020https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3404
References
- (2019) Lottery-related anomalies: The role of reference-dependent preferences. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print July 31, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3205.Google Scholar
- (2007) Trading volume: NASDAQ and the NYSE. Financial Anal. J. 63(3):79–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Reference point adaptation: Tests in the domain of security trading. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 105(1):67–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) The role of strategic reference points in explaining the nature and consequences of human resource strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 21(4):926–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Realization utility. J. Financial Econom. 104(2):251–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) A model of investor sentiment. J. Financial Econom. 49(3):307–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Reference-point formation and updating. Management Sci. 57(3):506–519.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Are investors really reluctant to realize their losses? Trading responses to past returns and the disposition effect. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(8):2485–2532.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Penny wise, dollar foolish: Buy–sell imbalances on and around round numbers. Management Sci. 58(2):413–431.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) The timing of 52-week high price and momentum. J. Banking Finance 37(10):3773–3782.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psych. Bull. 115(3):401–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Close encounters of two kinds: False alarms and dashed hopes. Marketing Sci. 21(2):178–196.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) A closer look at the short-term return reversal. Management Sci. 60(3):658–674.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Up close and personal: Investor sophistication and the disposition effect. Management Sci. 52(5):726–740.Link, Google Scholar
- (1973) Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. J. Polit. Econom. 81(3):607–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) The 52-week high and momentum investing. J. Finance 59(5):2145–2176.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Updating the reference level: Experimental evidence. Zwick R, Rapoport A, eds. Experimental Business Research (Springer, Boston), 263–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Prospect theory, mental accounting, and momentum. J. Financial Econom. 78(2):311–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) All’s well that ends well? On the importance of how returns are achieved. J. Banking Finance 87:397–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Speculative retail trading and asset prices. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 48(2):377–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Psychological factors and stock option exercise. Quart. J. Econom. 114(2):601–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) I was pleased a moment ago: How pleasure varies with background and foreground reference points. Motivation Emotion 28(1):65–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Aspirations as reference points: an experimental investigation of risk behavior over time. Theory Decision 75(2):193–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Volume and price patterns around a stock’s 52-week highs and lows: Theory and evidence. Management Sci. 55(1):16–31.Link, Google Scholar
- (1993) Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. J. Finance 48(1):65–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Market-wide impact of the disposition effect: Evidence from IPO trading volume. J. Financial Marketing 7(2):207–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Prospect theory and the disposition effect. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 45(3):791–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Reference point formation by market investors. J. Bank Finance 32(9):1782–1794.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1987) A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55(3):703–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Clearly irrational financial market behavior: Evidence from the early exercise of exchange traded stock options. J. Finance 58(1):37–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) The gambler’s and hot-hand fallacies: Theory and applications. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(2):730–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Factor related and specific returns of common stocks: Serial correlation and market inefficiency. J. Finance 37(2):543–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertainty 1(1):7–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. J. Finance 40(3):777–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Decision-dependent emotions and behavioral anomalies. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 118(2):226–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time. J. Financial Econom. 99(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Outlier sums for differential gene expression analysis. Biostatistics 8(1):2–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Reference-dependent preferences and the risk–return trade-off. J. Financial Econom. 123(2):395–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) Escalating commitment to a course of action: A reinterpretation. Acad. Management Rev. 11(2):311–321.Crossref, Google Scholar

