Fractional Degree Stochastic Dominance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3406

References

  • Aumann RJ, Serrano R (2008) An economic index of riskiness. J. Political Econom. 116(5):810–836.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baucells M, Heukamp FH (2006) Stochastic dominance and cumulative prospect theory. Management Sci. 52(9):1409–1423.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bawa S (1982) Stochastic dominance: A research bibliography. Management Sci. 28(6):698–712.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benishay H (1987) A fourth-degree polynomial utility function and its implications for investors’ responses toward four moments of the wealth distribution. J. Accounting Auditing Finance 2(3):203–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockett PL, Golden LL (1987) A class of utility functions containing all the common utility functions. Management Sci. 33(8):955–964.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caballé J, Pomansky A (1996) Mixed risk aversion. J. Econom. Theory 71(2):485–513.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cerreia-Vioglio S, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M (2016) Stochastic dominance analysis without the independence axiom. Management Sci. 63(4):1097–1109.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Deck C, Schlesinger H (2010) Exploring higher order risk effects. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(4):1403–1420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denuit M, Eeckhoudt L (2010) A general index of absolute risk attitude. Management Sci. 56(4):712–715.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denuit M, Müller A (2002) Smooth generators of integral stochastic orders. Ann. Appl. Probab. 12(4):1174–1184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ebert S (2013) Even (mixed) risk lovers are prudent: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(4):1536–1537.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ebert S, Wiesen D (2011) Testing for prudence and skewness seeking. Management Sci. 57(7):1334–1349.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eeckhoudt L, Schlesinger H (2006) Putting risk in its proper place. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):280–289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eeckhoudt L, Schlesinger H (2008) Changes in risk and the demand for saving. J. Monetary Econom. 55(7):1329–1336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eeckhoudt L, Huang RJ, Tzeng LY (2012) Precautionary effort: A new look. J. Risk Insurance 79(2):585–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eeckhoudt L, Schlesinger H, Tsetlin I (2009) Apportioning of risks via stochastic dominance. J. Econom. Theory 144(3):994–1003.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ekern S (1980) Increasing nth degree risk. Econom. Lett. 6(4):329–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn PC (1976) Continua of stochastic dominance relations for bounded probability distributions. J. Math. Econom. 3(3):295–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman M, Savage L (1948) The utility analysis of choices involving risk. J. Political Econom. 56(4):279–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gollier C (2018) Stochastic volatility implies fourth-degree risk dominance: Applications to asset pricing. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 95(October):155–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jindapon P, Neilson WS (2007) Higher-order generalizations of Arrow-Pratt and Ross risk aversion: A comparative statics approach. J. Econom. Theory 136(1):719–728.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jindapon P, Whaley CA (2015) Risk lovers and the rent over-investment puzzle. Public Choice 164(1–2):87–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jullien B, Salanie B (2000) Estimating preferences under risk: The case of racetrack bettors. J. Political Econom. 108(3):503–530.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimball MS (1990) Precautionary saving in the small and in the large. Econometrica 58(1):53–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimball MS (1991) Precautionary motives for holding assets. NBER Working Paper No. 3586, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Köbberling V, Wakker PP (2005) An index of loss aversion. J. Econom. Theory 122(1):119–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lajeri-Chaherli F (2004) Proper prudence, standard prudence and precautionary vulnerability. Econom. Lett. 82(1):29–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levy H (1992) Stochastic dominance and expected utility: Survey and analysis. Management Sci. 38(4):555–593.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levy H, Wiener Z (1998) Stochastic dominance and prospect dominance with subjective weighting functions. J. Risk Uncertainty 16(2):147–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu L, Meyer J (2013) Substituting one risk increase for another: A method for measuring risk aversion. J. Econom. Theory 148(6):2706–2718.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu L, Neilson WS (2019) Alternative approaches to comparative nth-degree risk aversion. Management Sci. 65(8):3824–3834.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Markowitz H (1952) The utility of wealth. J. Political Econom. 60(2):151–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Menezes C, Geiss C, Tressler J (1980) Increasing downside risk. Amer. Econom. Rev. 70(5):921–932.Google Scholar
  • Meyer J (1977) Second degree stochastic dominance with respect to a function. Internat. Econom. Rev. 18(2):477–487.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muliere P, Scarsini M (1989) A note on stochastic dominance and inequality measures. J. Econom. Theory 49(2):314–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Müller A, Stoyan D (2002) Comparison Methods for Stochastic Models and Risks (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Müller A, Scarsini M, Tsetlin I, Winkler RL (2017) Between first- and second-order stochastic dominance. Management Sci. 63(9):2933–2947.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nocetti DC (2016) Robust comparative statics of risk changes. Management Sci. 62(5):1381–1392.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Post T (2003) Empirical tests for stochastic dominance efficiency. J. Finance 58(5):1905–1931.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Post T, Levy H (2005) Does risk seeking drive stock prices? A stochastic dominance analysis of aggregate investor preferences and beliefs. Rev. Financial Stud. 18(3):925–953.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Post T, Vliet PV, Levy H (2008) Risk aversion and skewness preference. J. Banking Finance 32(7):1178–1187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross SA (1981) Some stronger measures of risk aversion in the small and the large with applications. Econometrica 49(3):621–638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothschild M, Stiglitz JE (1970) Increasing risk: I. A definition. J. Econom. Theory 2(3):225–243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shorrocks AF (1983) Ranking income distributions. Economica 50(197):3–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang J, Li J (2015) Precautionary effort: Another trait for prudence. J. Risk Insurance 82(4):977–983.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.