Pollution Regulation of Competitive Markets

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3413

References

  • Ata B, Lee D, Tongarlak M (2012) Optimizing organic waste to energy operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):231–244.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Atasu A, ed. (2016) Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains (Springer, Basel, Switzerland).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atasu A, Subramanian R (2012) Extended producer responsibility for e-waste: Individual or collective producer responsibility? Production Oper. Management 21(6):1042–1059.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atasu A, Van Wassenhove L, Sarvary M (2009) Efficient take-back legislation. Production Oper. Management 18(3):243–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bovenberg A, Goulder L, Gurney D (2005) Efficiency costs of meeting industry-distributional constraints under environmental permits and taxes. RAND J. Econom. 36(4):951–971.Google Scholar
  • Bray E (2016) 2016 minerals yearbook: Aluminum (advanced release). Technical report, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.Google Scholar
  • Broder J, Rudolf J (2011) E.P.A. proposes new emission standards for power plants. New York Times (March 16), https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/17/science/earth/17epa.html.Google Scholar
  • Broder J, Stolberg S (2010) E.P.A. delays tougher rules on emissions. New York Times (December 9), https://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/10/science/earth/10epa.html.Google Scholar
  • California Air Resources Board (2019) Cap-and-trade program: Allowance allocation. Accessed May 31, 2019, http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/allowanceallocation/allowanceallocation.htm.Google Scholar
  • Carbon Tax Center (2019) Where is carbon taxed?Accessed May 31, 2019, http://www.carbontax.org/services/where-carbon-is-taxed/.Google Scholar
  • Caro F, Corbett C, Tan T, Zuidwijk R (2013) Double counting in supply chain carbon footprinting. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):545–558.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Christin C, Nicolai J, Pouyet J (2013) Pollution permits, imperfect competition and abatement technologies. Economics Working Paper 13/186, Center of Economic Research, ETH Zurich, Zurich.Google Scholar
  • Coase R (1960) The problem of social cost. J. Law Econom. 3:1–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett C, Klassen R (2006) Extending the horizons: Environmental excellence as key to improving operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 8(1):5–22.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Creyts J, Derkach A, Nyquist S, Ostrowski K, Stephenson J (2007) Reducing U.S. greenhouse gas emissions: How much at what cost? Technical report, McKinsey and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  • Demsetz H (1981) Economic, legal, and political dimensions of competition. Discussion Paper 209, Department of Economics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  • Drake D, Kleindorfer P, Van Wassenhove L (2016a) HeidelbergCement: The Baltic Kiln Decision (Harvard Business Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Drake D, Kleindorfer P, Van Wassenhove L (2016b) Technology choice and capacity portfolios under emissions regulation. Production Oper. Management 25(6):1006–1025.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrhart K, Hoppe C, Löschel R (2008) Abuse of EU emissions trading for tacit collusion. Environ. Resource Econom. 41(3):347–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farzin Y (2003) The effects of emissions standards on industry. J. Regulatory Econom. 24(3):315–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gui L, Atasu A, Ergun O, Toktay B (2016) Efficient implementation of collective extended producer responsibility legislation. Management Sci. 62(4):1098–1123.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hartman R, Wheeler D, Singh M (1997) The cost of air pollution abatement. Appl. Econom. 29(6):759–774.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Islegen O, Plambeck E, Taylor T (2016) Variability in emissions cost: Implications for facility location, production and shipping. Atasu A, ed. Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains (Springer, New York), 283–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobs B, Subramanian R (2012) Sharing responsibility for product recovery across the supply chain. Production Oper. Management 21(1):85–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe A, Newell R, Stavins R (2003) Technological change and the environment. Mäler K-G, Vincent JR, eds. Handbook of Environmental Economics, vol. 1 (North-Holland/Elsevier Science, Amsterdam), 461–516.Google Scholar
  • Kalkanci B, Ang E, Plambeck E (2012) Measurement and improvement of environmental performance under voluntary vs. mandatory eco-labels. 2012 MSOM Annual Conf., New York.Google Scholar
  • Kleindorfer P, Singhal K, Van Wassenhove L (2005) Sustainable operations management. Production Oper. Management 14(4):482–492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krass D, Nedorezov T, Ovchinnikov A (2013) Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Production Oper. Management 22(5):1035–1055.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kroes J, Subramanian R, Subramanyam R (2012) Operational compliance levers, environmental performance, and firm performance under cap and trade regulation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):186–201.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levi M, Nault B (2004) Converting technology to mitigate environmental damage. Management Sci. 50(8):1015–1030.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nault B (1996) Equivalence of taxes and subsidies in the control of production externalities. Management Sci. 42(3):307–320.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • New York Times (2011) A.E.P. protests too much. New York Times (June 19), https://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/20/opinion/20mon1.html.Google Scholar
  • Pigou A (1912) Wealth and Welfare (MacMillan and Co., London).Google Scholar
  • Plambeck E, Wang Q (2009) Effects of e-waste regulation on new product introduction. Management Sci. 55(3):333–347.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pope C, Burnett R, Thun M, Calle E, Krewski D, Ito K, Thurston G (2002) Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 287(9):1132–1141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Portland Cement Association (2016) 2016 U.S. Cement Industry Annual Yearbook. Accessed May 31, 2019, http://www.cement.org/.Google Scholar
  • Requate T (1993a) Equivalence of effluent taxes and permits for environmental regulation of several local monopolies. Econom. Lett. 42(1):91–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Requate T (1993b) Pollution control in a Cournot duopoly via taxes and permits. J. Econom. 58(3):255–291.Google Scholar
  • Requate T (2006) Environmental policy under imperfect competition—A survey. Tietenberg T, Folmer H, eds. The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2006/2007 (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 120–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seade J (1985) Profitable cost increases and the shifting of taxation: Equilibrium responses of markets in oligopoly. Warwick Economic Research Papers, No. 260, Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.Google Scholar
  • Serpa J, Krishnan H (2016) Policy incentives for dangerous (but necessary) operations. Production Oper. Management 25(10):1778–1798.Google Scholar
  • Singh N, Vives X (1984) Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. RAND J. Econom. 15(4):546–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Souza G (2012) Sustainable Operations and Closed-Loop Supply Chains (Business Expert Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Stavins R (2003) Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments. Mäler K-G, Vincent JR, eds. Handbook of Environmental Economics, vol. 1 (North-Holland/Elsevier Science, Amsterdam), 355–435.Google Scholar
  • Subramanian R, Gupta S, Talbot B (2007) Compliance strategies under permits for emissions. Production Oper. Management 16(6):763–779.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Subramanian R, Gupta S, Talbot B (2009) Product design and supply chain coordination under extended producer responsibility. Production Oper. Management 18(3):259–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sunar N, Plambeck E (2016) Allocating emissions among co-products: Implications for procurement and climate policy. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(3):414–428.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tietenberg T, Lewis L (2011) Environmental and Natural Resource Economics (Pearson Addison Wesley, New York).Google Scholar
  • U.S. Census Bureau (2005) Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures (PACE) Survey: 2005. Technical Report MA200(05), U.S. Census Bureau, Suitland, MD.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Energy Information Administration (2018) Refinery capacity data by individual refinery as of January 1, 2018. Accessed May 31, 2019, https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/data.php.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2015) BenMAP environmental benefits mapping and analysis program—Community edition—User’s manual—Appendices. Technical report, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2019) Particulate matter: Health effects. Accessed May 31, 2019, https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/health-and-environmental-effects-particulate-matter-pm.Google Scholar
  • Von der Fehr N (1993) Tradable emission rights and strategic interaction. Environ. Resource Econom. 3(2):129–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weitzman ML (1974) Prices vs. quantities. Rev. Econom. Stud. 41(4):477–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.