Intertemporal Demand Spillover Effects on Video Game Platforms

References

• Albuquerque P, Nevskaya Y (2015) The impact of innovation and social interactions on product usage. Working paper, Olin Business School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Murphy KM (1988) A theory of rational addiction. J. Political Econom. 96(4):675–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Qin M, Vitorino MA (2018) Licensing and price competition in tied-goods markets: An application to the single-serve coffee system industry. Marketing Sci. 37(6):855–1052.Google Scholar
• Clements MT, Ohashi H (2005) Indirect network effects and the product cycle: Video games in the U.S., 1994–2002. J. Indust. Econom. 53(4):515–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corts KS, Lederman M (2009) Software exclusivity and the scope of indirect network effects in the us home video game market. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(2):121–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Derdenger T (2014) Technological tying and the intensity of price competition: An empirical analysis of the video game industry. Quant. Marketing Econom. 12(2):127–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Derdenger T, Kumar V (2013) The dynamic effects of bundling as a product strategy. Marketing Sci. 32(6):827–859.Link, Google Scholar
• Doraszelski U, Lewis G, Pakes A (2018) Just starting out: Learning and equilibrium in a new market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(3):565–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Hitsch GJ, Chintagunta PK (2010a) Tipping and concentration in markets with indirect network effects. Marketing Sci. 29(2):216–249.Link, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE (2009) Do switching costs make markets less competitive? J. Marketing Res. 46(4):435–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-PH, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE (2010b) State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. RAND J. Econom. 41(3):417–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher S (1994) Identifying video game addiction in children and adolescents. Addiction Behav. 19(5):545–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentzkow M (2007) Valuing new goods in a model with complementarity: Online newspapers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):713–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon BR, Sun B (2015) A dynamic model of rational addiction: Evaluating cigarette taxes. Marketing Sci. 34(3):452–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Guryan J, Kearney MS (2008) Gambling at lucky stores: Empirical evidence from state lottery sales. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):458–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guryan J, Kearney MS (2010) Is lottery gambling addictive? Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 2(3):90–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR, Nair H (2010) Retail competition and the dynamics of demand for tied goods. Marketing Sci. 29(2):366–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1981) Heterogeneity and state dependence. Rosen S, ed. Studies in Labor Markets, vol. I (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 91–140.Google Scholar
• Hendricks K, Sorensen A (2009) Information and the skewness of music sales. J. Political Econom. 117(2):324–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ishihara M, Ching A (2019) Dynamic demand for new and used durable goods without physical depreciation: The case of Japanese video games. Marketing Sci. 38(3):392–416.Link, Google Scholar
• King DL, Delfabbro P, Griffiths M (2012) Video game addiction: Past, present and future. Current Psych. Rev. 8(4):308–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kong P, Ellickson PB, Lovett MJ (2017) Putting the horses before the cart: Harnessing the power of partner brands. Working paper, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.Google Scholar
• Lee RS (2012) Home Videogame Platforms. Peitz M, Waldfogel J, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Digital Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 83–107.Google Scholar
• Lee RS (2013) Vertical integration and exclusivity in platform and two-sided markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2960–3000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair H (2007) Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the US market for console video-games. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(3):239–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair H, Chintagunta P, Dubé J-P (2004) Empirical analysis of indirect network effects in the market for personal digital assistants. Quant. Marketing Econom. 2(1):23–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2017) U.S. games 360 report. Technical report, Nielsen, New York.Google Scholar
• Pham A (2010) Anatomy of a $60 video game. Los Angeles Times (February 19), Company Town blog, https://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2010/02/anatomy-of-a-60-dollar-video-game.html.Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan SP, Tucker C (2012) Heterogeneity and the dynamics of technology adoption. Quant. Marketing Econom. 10(1):63–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shiller BR (2013) Digital distribution and the prohibition of resale markets for information goods. Quant. Marketing Econom. 11(4):403–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomassen Ø, Smith H, Seiler S, Schiraldi P (2017) Multi-category competition and market power: A model of supermarket pricing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(8):2308–2351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuchman AE (2018) Advertising and demand for addictive goods: The effects of e-cigarette advertising. Working paper, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar