Contracting with Word-of-Mouth Management

References

• Ajorlou A, Jadbabaie A, Kakhbod A (2018) Dynamic pricing in social networks: The word-of-mouth effect. Management Sci. 64(2):971–979.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson EW (1998) Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. J. Service Res. 1(1):5–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• A.R. (2012) Dropbox: A nebulous future. Babbage (blog) (December 22), http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2012/12/dropbox.Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2011) Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. 57(9):1623–1639.Link, Google Scholar
• Bass FM (1969) A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. 15(5):215–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Berger J (2014) Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. J. Consumer Psych. 24(4):586–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Schwartz EM (2011) What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth? J. Marketing. Res. 48(5):869–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Ozdaglar A, Yildiz E (2016) Competitive targeted advertising over networks. Oper. Res. 64(3):705–720.Link, Google Scholar
• Biyalogorsky E, Gerstner E, Libai B (2001) Customer referral management: Optimal reward programs. Marketing Sci. 20(1):82–95.Link, Google Scholar
• Campbell A (2013) Word of mouth and percolation in social networks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(6):2466–2498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell A, Mayzlin D, Shin J (2017) Managing buzz. RAND J. Econom. 48(1):203–229.Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Xie J (2008) Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Sci. 54(3):477–491.Link, Google Scholar
• Csorba G (2008) Screening contracts in the presence of positive network effects. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 26(1):213–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dichter E (1966) How word-of-mouth advertising works. Harvard Bus. Rev. 44(6):147–160.Google Scholar
• Eisenmann TR, Coles PA (2006) Skype. HBS Case 9-806-165, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Fainmesser IP, Lauga DO, Ofek E (2019) Ratings, reviews, and the marketing of new products. Carey Business School Research Paper 19-02, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
• Galeotti A (2010) Talking, searching, and pricing. Internat. Econom. Rev. 51(4):1159–1174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galeotti A, Goyal S (2009) Influencing the influencers: A theory of strategic diffusion. RAND J. Econom. 40(3):509–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2009) Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. 28(4):721–739.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D, Chen Y, Das S, Dellarocas C, Pfeiffer B, Libai B, Sen S, Shi M, Verlegh P (2005) The firm’s management of social interactions. Marketing Lett. 16(3–4):415–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J, Libai B, Muller E (2001) Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying process of word-of-mouth. Marketing Lett. 12(3):211–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn J-H (2003) Nonlinear pricing of telecommunications with call and network externalities. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 21(7):949–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck B, Moorthy S, Proserpio D (2019) Advertising strategy in the presence of reviews: An empirical analysis. Marketing Sci. 38(5):783–811.Google Scholar
• Houston D (2010) Dropbox startup lessons learned. Accessed May 5, 2016, http://www.slideshare.net/gueste94e4c/dropbox-startup-lessons-learned-3836587.Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW (2011) Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):195–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Joshi YV, Musalem A (2018) Does word of mouth reduce advertising that signals quality? Robert H. Smith School Research Paper RHS-06-150, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
• Katona Z, Zubcsek PP, Sarvary M (2011) Network effects and personal influences: The diffusion of an online social network. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):425–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornish LJ, Li Q (2010) Optimal referral bonuses with asymmetric information: Firm-offered and interpersonal incentives. Marketing Sci. 29(1):108–121.Link, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Misra K (2016) Fee or free: When should firms charge for online content? Management Sci. 63(4):1150–1165.Link, Google Scholar
• Leduc MV, Jackson MO, Johari R (2017) Pricing and referrals in diffusion on networks. Games Econom. Behav. 104(July):568–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee C, Kumar V, Gupta S (2017) Designing freemium: Balancing growth and monetization strategies. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Xie Y, Youn N (2008) The role of targeted communication and contagion in product adoption. Marketing Sci. 27(6):961–976.Link, Google Scholar
• Maskin E, Riley J (1984) Monopoly with incomplete information. RAND J. Econom. 15(2):171–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayzlin D (2006) Promotional chat on the internet. Marketing Sci. 25(2):155–163.Link, Google Scholar
• Schmitt P, Skiera B, Van den Bulte C (2011) Referral programs and customer value. J. Marketing 75(1):46–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segal I (2003) Coordination and discrimination in contracting with externalities: Divide and conquer? J. Econom. Theory 113(2):147–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C, Varian HR (1998) Versioning: The smart way to sell information. Harvard Bus. Rev. 107(6):106–114.Google Scholar
• Shi Z(J), Zhang K, Srinivasan K (2019) Freemium as an optimal strategy for market dominant firms. Marketing Sci. 38(1):150–169.Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Joshi YV (2007) New product diffusion with influentials and imitators. Marketing Sci. 26(3):400–421.Link, Google Scholar