Do the Burdens to Being Public Affect the Investment and Innovation of Newly Public Firms?

References

• Aggarwal VA, Hsu DH (2013) Entrepreneurial exits and innovation. Management Sci. 60(4):867–887.Link, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Van Reenen J, Zingales L (2013) Innovation and institutional ownership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(1):277–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albuquerque AM, Zhu JL (2019) Has Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act discouraged corporate risk-taking? New evidence from a natural experiment. Management Sci. 65(7):3423–3446.Link, Google Scholar
• Asker J, Farre-Mensa J, Ljungqvist A (2015) Corporate investment and stock market listing: A puzzle? Rev. Financial Stud. 28(2):342–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin PC (2011) Optimal caliper widths for propensity‐score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharmaceutical Statist. 10(2):150–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Badertscher B, Shroff N, White HD (2013) Externalities of public firm presence: Evidence from private firms’ investment decisions. J. Financial Econom. 109(3):682–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bargeron LL, Lehn KM, Zutter CJ (2010) Sarbanes-Oxley and corporate risk-taking. J. Accounting Econom. 49(1):34–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barth ME, Landsman WR, Taylor DJ (2017) The JOBS Act and information uncertainty in IPO firms. Accounting Rev. 92(6):25–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellstam G, Bhagat S, Cookson JA (2017) A text-based analysis of corporate innovation. Working paper, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder.Google Scholar
• Bernstein S (2015) Does going public affect innovation? J. Finance 70(4):1365–1403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Bond S, Van Reenen J (2007) Uncertainty and investment dynamics. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(2):391–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradshaw MT (2009) Analyst information processing, financial regulation, and academic research. Accounting Rev. 84(4):1073–1083.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaplinsky S, Hanley KW, Moon SK (2017) The jobs act and the costs of going public. J. Accounting Res. 55(4):795–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng M (2015) Going public privately: The role of the cost of premature disclosure in the IPO process. Unpublished dissertation, Emory University, Atlanta.Google Scholar
• Coates JC, Srinivasan S (2014) SOX after ten years: A multidisciplinary review. Accounting Horizons 28(3):627–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper M, Knott A, Yang W (2019) RQ innovative efficiency and firm value. Working paper, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
• Dambra M (2018) Stakeholder conflicts and cash flow shocks: Evidence from changes in ERISA pension funding rules. Accounting Rev. 93(1):131–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dambra M, Field LC, Gustafson MT (2015) The JOBS Act and IPO volume: Evidence that disclosure costs affect the IPO decision. J. Financial Econom. 116(1):121–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dambra M, Field LC, Gustafson MT, Pisciotta KJ (2018) The consequences to analyst involvement in the IPO process: Evidence surrounding the JOBS Act. J. Accounting Econom. 65(2–3):302–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doidge C, Karolyi GA, Stulz RM (2017) The U.S. listing gap. J. Financial Econom. 123(3):464–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferreira D, Manso G, Silva AC (2012) Incentives to innovate and the decision to go public or private. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(1):256–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Financial Executives International (FEI) (2005) Sarbanes–Oxley compliance costs exceed estimates. Accessed September 6, 2019, https://www.euromoney.com/article/b1320xlg6qsbw1/survey-finds-sox-compliance-costs-exceed-estimates.Google Scholar
• Fu R, Kraft A, Zhang H (2012) Financial reporting frequency, information asymmetry, and the cost of equity. J. Accounting Econom. 54(2):132–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao F, Wu JS, Zimmerman J (2009) Unintended consequences of granting small firms exemptions from securities regulation: Evidence from the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act. J. Accounting Res. 47(2):459–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao H, Zhang J (2019) SOX Section 404 and corporate innovation. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 54(2):759–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao X, Ritter JR, Zhu Z (2013) Where have all the IPOs gone? J. Financial Quant. Anal. 48(6):1663–1692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerstein J (2006) Friedman, 93, set to unleash power of choice. New York Sun (March 22), https://www.nysun.com/national/friedman-93-set-to-unleash-power-of-choice/29551/.Google Scholar
• Gipper B (2017) The economic effects of mandating expanded compensation disclosures. Stanford Graduate School of Business Working Paper No. 3442, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Grullon G, Larkin Y, Michaely R (2018) Are U.S. industries becoming more concentrated? Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Gustafson MT, Iliev P (2017) The effects of removing barriers to equity issuance. J. Financial Econom. 124(3):580–598.Google Scholar
• Hanley KW (2017) The economics of primary markets. Working paper, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.Google Scholar
• Herper M (2013) Why the JOBS Act is a lifesaver for life science companies. Forbes Magazine (July 19), https://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewherper/2013/07/19/why-the-jobs-act-is-a-lifesaver-for-life-sciences-companies/#7db9550b7340.Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B (1989) Agency costs and innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 12(3):305–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iliev P (2010) The effect of SOX Section 404: Costs, earnings quality, and stock prices. J. Finance 65(3):1163–1196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iliev P, Vitanova S (2019) The effect of the say-on-pay vote in the United States. Management Sci. 65(10):4505–4521.Link, Google Scholar
• IPO Task Force (2011) Rebuilding the IPO on-ramp: Putting emerging companies and the job market back on the road to growth. Accessed October 11, 2019, https://www.sec.gov/info/smallbus/acsec/rebuilding_the_ipo_on-ramp.pdf.Google Scholar
• Jensen MC (1986) Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(2):323–329.Google Scholar
• Kang Q, Liu Q, Qi R (2010) The Sarbanes-Oxley act and corporate investment: A structural assessment. J. Financial Econom. 96(2):291–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanodia C, Sapra H (2016) A real effects perspective to accounting measurement and disclosure: Implications and insights for future research. J. Accounting Res. 54(2):623–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN, Minton BA (2012) How has CEO turnover changed? Internat. Rev. Finance 12(1):57–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraft AG, Vashishtha R, Venkatachalam M (2017) Frequent financial reporting and managerial myopia. Accounting Rev. 93(2):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leuz C, Verrecchia RE (2000) The economic consequences of increased disclosure. J. Accounting Res. 38(suppl):91–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leuz C, Wysocki PD (2016) The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: Evidence and suggestions for future research. J. Accounting Res. 54(2):525–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li S (2010) Does mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards in the European Union reduce the cost of equity capital? Accounting Rev. 85(2):607–636.Google Scholar
• Loughran T, Ritter J (2004) Why has IPO underpricing changed over time? Financial Management 33(3):5–37.Google Scholar
• Lowry M, Michaely R, Volkova E (2017) Initial public offering: A synthesis of the literature and directions for future research. Foundations Trends Finance 11(3–4):154–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1992) Capital disadvantage: America’s failing capital investment system. Harvard Bus. Rev. 70(5):65–82.Google Scholar
• Pozen R, Nallareddy S, Rajgopal S (2017) Impact of reporting frequency on UK public companies. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Seru A (2014) Firm boundaries matter: Evidence from conglomerates and R&D activity. J. Financial Econom. 111(2):381–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Wolfenzon D (2002) Investor protection and equity markets. J. Financial Econom. 66(1):3–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solow RM (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev. Econom. Statist. 39(3):312–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swan TW (1956) Economic growth and capital accumulation. Econom. Rec. 32(2):334–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2018) SEC expands the scope of smaller public companies that qualify for scaled disclosures. Accessed October 11, 2019, https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-116.Google Scholar
• Xu Q, Zwick E (2018) Kinky tax policy and abnormal investment behavior. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Wurgler J (2000) Financial markets and the allocation of capital. J. Financial Econom. 58(1):187–214.Crossref, Google Scholar