The Value of Sharing Intermittent Spectrum

References

• Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A (2007a) Competition and efficiency in congested markets. Math. Oper. Res. 32(1):1–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A (2007b) Competition in parallel-serial networks. IEEE J. Selected Areas Comm. 25(6):1180–1192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Bimpikis K, Ozdaglar A (2009) Price and capacity competition. Games Econom. Behav. 66(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allon G, Federgruen A (2007) Competition in service industries. Oper. Res. 55(1):37–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Armony M, Haviv M (2003) Price and delay competition between two service providers. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 147(1):32–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bykowsky MM, Sharkey WW (2016) An economic welfare analysis of shared spectrum use: A case study of LTE-U/LAA. Preprint, submitted October 24, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2857632.Google Scholar
• Cramton P, Kwerel E, Rosston G, Skrzypacz A (2011) Using spectrum auctions to enhance competition in wireless services. J. Law Econom. 54(S4):S167–S188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engel E, Fischer R, Galetovic A (1999) Toll competition among congested roads. NBER Technical Working Paper 239, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Faulhaber GR, Hogendorn C (2000) The market structure of broadband telecommunications. J. Indust. Econom. 48(3):305–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Federal Communications Commission (2015a) Amendment of the Commission’s rules with regard to commercial operations in the 3550-3650 MHz band. FCC 15-47 Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Federal Communications Commission (2015b) Updating part 1 competitive bidding rules; expanding the economic and innovation opportunities of spectrum through incentive auctions. Report and Order, GN Docket No. 12-268. Accessed September 3, 2019, https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-15-80A1.pdf.Google Scholar
• Federal Communications Commission (2017) FCC fact sheet: Exploring flexible use in mid-band spectrum between 3.7 GHz and 24 GHz. Notice of Inquiry, GN Docket No. 17-183, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Hayrapetyan A, Tardos E, Wexler T (2005) A network pricing game for selfish traffic. Proc. 24th Annual ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Sympos. Principles Distributed Comput. (ACM, New York), 284–291.Google Scholar
• Johari R, Tsitsiklis JN (2005) Efficiency Loss in Cournot Games (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Johari R, Weintraub GY, Roy BV (2010) Investment and market structure in industries with congestion. Oper. Res. 58(5):1303–1317.Link, Google Scholar
• Kluberg J, Perakis G (2012) Generalized quantity competition for multiple products and loss of efficiency. Oper. Res. 60(2):335–350.Link, Google Scholar
• Kreps DM, Scheinkman JA (1983) Quantity precommitment and Bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomes. Bell J. Econom. 14(2):326–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levhari D, Luski I (1978) Duopoly pricing and waiting lines. Eur. Econom. Rev. 11(1):17–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu C, Berry RA (2015) Investing and price competition for multiple bands of unlicensed spectrum. 2015 IEEE INFOCOM Workshop Smart Data Pricing (IEEE, New York), 522–527.Google Scholar
• Maillé P, Tuffin B, Vigne J-M (2012) Competition between wireless service providers sharing a radio resource. Bestak R, Kencl L, Li LE, Widmer J, Yin H, eds. Internat. Conf. Res. Networking, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7290 (Springer, New York), 355–365.Google Scholar
• Nguyen T, Zhou H, Berry R, Honig M, Vohra R (2016) The cost of free spectrum. Oper. Res. 64(6):1217–1229.Link, Google Scholar
• Nguyen T, Zhou H, Berry RA, Honig ML, Vohra R (2011) The impact of additional unlicensed spectrum on wireless services competition. IEEE Sympos. New Frontiers Dynam. Spectrum Access Networks (IEEE, New York), 146–155.Google Scholar
• Nikolova E, Stier-Moses NE (2014) A mean-risk model for the traffic assignment problem with stochastic travel times. Oper. Res. 62(2):366–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Perakis G, Sun W (2014) Efficiency analysis of Cournot competition in service industries with congestion. Management Sci. 60(11):2684–2700.Link, Google Scholar
• Petruzzi NC, Dada M (1999) Pricing and the newsvendor problem: A review with extensions. Oper. Res. 47(2):183–194.Link, Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2012) Realizing the full potential of government-held spectrum to spur economic growth. Report, President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Roughgarden T, Tardos É (2002) How bad is selfish routing? J. ACM 49(2):236–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skorup B (2016) Sweeten the deal: Transfer of federal spectrum through overlay licenses. Richmond J. Law Tech. 22(5). Google Scholar
• Xiao F, Yang H, Han D (2007) Competition and efficiency of private toll roads. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodology 41(3):292–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Johari R, Rajagopal R (2015) Cournot games with uncertainty: Coalitions, competition, and efficiency. Preprint, submitted March 9, https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.02479.Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Zhang W (2013) Competition between wireless service providers: Pricing, equilibrium and efficiency. 11th Internat. Sympos. Modeling Optimization Mobile Ad Hoc Wireless Networks (IEEE, New York), 208–215.Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Berry RA, Honig ML, Vohra R (2012) Investment and competition in unlicensed spectrum. 46th Annual Conf. Inform. Sci. Systems (IEEE, New York), 1–6.Google Scholar