Equity Contracts and Incentive Design in Start-Up Teams

References

• Ambrus A, Greiner B (2012) Imperfect public monitoring with costly punishment: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3317–3332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancer J (2015) Splitting founder equity: Avoid “grunt funds.” Accessed August 20, 2019, http://siliconhillslawyer.com/2015/06/01/founder-equity-grunt-funds/.Google Scholar
• Balafoutas L, Kocher MG, Putterman L, Sutter M (2013) Equality, equity and incentives: An experiment. Eur. Econom. Rev. 60(May):32–51.Google Scholar
• Bao J, Wu A (2017) Equality and equity in compensation.Google Scholar
• Barber AE, Roehling MV (1993) Job postings and the decision to interview: A verbal protocol analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 78(5):845–856.Google Scholar
• Belt JA, Paolillo JG (1982) The influence of corporate image and specificity of candidate qualifications on response to recruitment advertisement. J. Management 8(1):105–112.Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran SR, Krishnan V (2009) Effort, revenue, and cost sharing mechanisms for collaborative new product development. Management Sci. 55(7):1152–1169.Google Scholar
• Bohnet I, Zeckhauser R (2004) Trust, risk and betrayal. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 55(4):467–484.Google Scholar
• Bornstein G, Weisel O (2010) Punishment, cooperation, and cheater detection in noisy social exchange. Games 1(1):18–33.Google Scholar
• Breugst N, Patzelt H, Rathgeber P (2015) How should we divide the pie? Equity distribution and its impact on entrepreneurial teams. J. Bus. Venturing 30(1):66–94.Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Hole AD, Sorensen E (2007) The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):818–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Sørensen E, Tungodden B (2010) Responsibility for what? Fairness and individual responsibility. Eur. Econom. Rev. 54(3):429–441.Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K, Katok E, Sterman J (2014) Order stability in supply chains: coordination risk and the role of coordination stock. Production Oper. Management 23(2):176–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cubitt R, Gächter S, Quercia S (2017) Conditional cooperation and betrayal aversion. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 141:110–121.Google Scholar
• Dal Bó P, Foster A, Putterman L (2010) Institutions and behavior: Experimental evidence on the effects of democracy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(December):2205–2229.Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A (2011) Performance pay and multidimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences, and gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(April):556–590.Google Scholar
• Encinosa WE, Gaynor M, Rebitzer JB (2007) The sociology of groups and the economics of incentives: Theory and evidence on compensation systems. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 62(2):187–214.Google Scholar
• Engel C (2014) Social preferences can make imperfect sanctions work: Evidence from a public good experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 108:343–353.Google Scholar
• Falk A, Ichino A (2006) Clean evidence on peer effects. J. Labor Econom. 24(1):39–57.Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Scotchmer S (1988) Partnerships. Quart. J. Econom. 103(2):279–297.Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Goette L, Zehnder C (2009) A behavioral account of the labor market: The role of fairness concerns. Annual Rev. Econom. (1):355–384.Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Nosenzo D, Sefton M (2013) Peer effects in pro-social behavior: Social norms or social preferences? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):548–573.Google Scholar
• Gower JC (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27(4):857–871.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grechenig C, Nicklisch A, Thoni C (2010) Punishment despite reasonable doubt—A public goods experiment with uncertainty over contributions. J. Empirical Legal Stud. 7(4):1–32.Google Scholar
• Gürerk Ö (2013) Social learning increases the acceptance and the efficiency of punishment institutions in social dilemmas. J. Econom. Psych. 34(October):229–239.Google Scholar
• Gürerk Ö, Irlenbusch B, Rockenbach B (2006) The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science 312(August):108–111.Google Scholar
• Gürerk Ö, Irlenbusch B, Rockenbach B (2009) Voting with feet: Community choice in social dilemmas. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4643, IZA Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Hellmann TF, Wasserman N (2017) The first deal: The division of founder equity in new ventures. Management Sci. 63(8):2647–2666.Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lattin JM, Carroll JD, Green PE (2003) Analyzing Multivariate Data (Thomson/Brooks Cole, Pacific Grove, CA).Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch CH (2016) Creativity and risk taking aren’t rational: Behavioral operations in MOT. Production Oper. Management 26(4):591–604.Google Scholar
• Metrick A, Yasuda A (2010) Venture Capital and the Finance of Innovation (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Moyer M (2012) Slicing Pie, Fund Your Company Without Funds (Lake Shark Ventures, Lake Forest, IL).Google Scholar
• Murphy RO, Ackermann KA, Handgraaf MJJ (2011) Measuring social value orientation. Judgment Decision Making 6(8):771–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nai J (2016) Timing of reward allocations. Doctoral dissertation, National University of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
• Ng P, Wong WK, Xiao Z (2017) Stochastic dominance via quantile regression with applications to investigate arbitrage opportunity and market efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 261(2):666–678.Google Scholar
• Ostrom E, Walker J, Gardner R (1992) Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 86(2):404–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Langton N (1993) The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):382–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putterman L, Tyran JR, Kamei K (2011) Public goods and voting on formal sanction schemes. J. Public Econom. 95(9–10):1213–1222.Google Scholar
• Rahmani M, Roels G, Karmarkar US (2017) Collaborative work dynamics in projects with co-production. Production Oper. Management 26(4):686–703.Google Scholar
• Rahmani M, Roels G, Karmarkar US (2018) Team leadership and performance: Combining the roles of direction and participation. Management Sci. 64(11):5234–5249.Google Scholar
• Rapoport A, Au WT (2001) Bonus and penalty in common pool resource dilemmas under uncertainty. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 85(1):135–165.Google Scholar
• Rockenbach B, Wolff I (2016) Designing institutions for social dilemmas. German Econom. Rev. 17(104):316–336.Google Scholar
• Sousa S (2010) Cooperation and punishment under uncertain enforcement. CeDEx Discussion Paper No. 2010-06, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
• Sutter M, Haigner S, Kocher MG (2010) Choosing the carrot or the stick? Endogenous institutional choice in social dilemma situations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(4):1540–1566.Google Scholar
• Teyssier S (2012) Inequity and risk aversion in sequential public good games. Public Choice 151(1–2):91–119.Google Scholar
• Tyran JR, Feld LP (2006) Achieving compliance when legal sanctions are non-deterrent. Scandinavian J. Econom. 108(1):135–156.Google Scholar
• Wasserman N (2012) The Founder’s Dilemmas (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yuce P, Highhouse S (1998) Effects of attribute set size and pay ambiguity on reactions to “help wanted” advertisements. J. Organ. Behav. 19(4):337–352.Crossref, Google Scholar