Asymmetric Attention and Stock Returns

References

• Admati AR (1985) A noisy rational expectations equilibrium for multi-asset securities markets. Econometrica 53(3):629–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amihud Y (2002) Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects. J. Financial Marketing 5(1):31–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bae K, Stulz R, Tan H (2008) Do local analysts know more? A cross-country study of the performance of local analysts and foreign analysts. J. Financial Econom. 88(3):581–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber B, Odean T (2008) All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(2):785–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber BM, Odean T, Zhu N (2009) Do retail trades move markets? Rev. Financial Stud. 22(1):151–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Rephael A, Da Z, Israelsen RD (2016) It depends on where you search: Institutional investor attention and under-reaction to news. Rev. Financial Stud. 30(9):3009–3047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boguth O, Carlson M, Fisher A, Simutin M (2016) Horizon effects in average returns: The role of slow information diffusion. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(8):2241–2281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brogaard J, Hagströmer B, Nordén L, Riordan R (2015) Trading fast and slow: Colocation and liquidity. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(12):3407–3443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S, Hillegeist SA (2007) How disclosure quality affects the level of information asymmetry. Rev. Accounting Stud. 12(2–3):443–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carhart M (1997) On persistence in mutual fund performance. J. Finance 52(1):57–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coval J, Moskowitz T (1999) Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. J. Finance 54(6):2045–2073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coval J, Moskowitz T (2001) The geography of investment: Informed trading and asset prices. J. Political Econom. 109(4):811–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Da Z, Engelberg J, Gao P (2011) In search of attention. J. Finance 66(5):1461–1499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniel K, Grinblatt M, Titman S, Wermers R (1997) Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarks. J. Finance 52(3):1035–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis J, Fama E, French K (2000) Characteristics, covariances, and average returns: 1929–1997. J. Finance 55(1):389–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Pollet JM (2009) Investor inattention and Friday earnings announcements. J. Finance 64(2):709–749.Google Scholar
• Dorn D, Huberman G, Sengmueller P (2008) Correlated trading and returns. J. Finance 63(2):885–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drake MS, Roulstone DT, Thornock JR (2012) Investor information demand: Evidence from Google searches around earnings announcements. J. Accounting Res. 50(4):1001–1040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Easley D, Kiefer NM, O’Hara M, Paperman JB (1996) Liquidity, information, and infrequently traded stocks. J. Finance 51(4):1405–1436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E, French K (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. 33(1):3–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E, MacBeth J (1973) Risk, return and equilibrium: Empirical tests. J. Political Econom. 81(3):607–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang L, Peress J (2009) Media coverage and the cross-section of stock returns. J. Finance 64(5):2023–2052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frieder L, Subrahmanyam A (2005) Brand perceptions and the market for common stock. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 40(1):57–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garcia D, Norli O (2012) Geographic dispersion and stock returns. J. Financial Econom. 106(3):547–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Stiglitz JE (1980) On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 70(3):393–408.Google Scholar
• Grote M, Umber M (2006) Home biased? A spatial analysis of the domestic merging behavior of US firms. Working paper, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
• Hartzmark SM (2014) The worst, the best, ignoring all the rest: The rank effect and trading behavior. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(4):1024–1059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holden CW, Jacobsen S (2014) Liquidity measurement problems in fast, competitive markets: Expensive and cheap solutions. J. Finance 69(4):1747–1785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H, Stein JC (1999) A unified theory of underreaction, momentum trading and overreaction in asset markets. J. Finance 54(6):2143–2184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hou K, Robinson D (2006) Industry concentration and average stock returns. J. Finance 61(4):1927–1956.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hou K, Peng L, Xiong W (2008) A tale of two anomalies: The implications of investor attention for price and earnings momentum. Working paper, The Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
• Hvidkjaer S (2008) Small trades and the cross-section of stock returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(3):1123–1151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ivkovic Z, Weisbenner S (2005) Local does as local is: Information content of the geography of individual investors’ common stock investments. J. Finance 60(1):267–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk M, Van Nieuwerburgh S, Veldkamp L (2016) A rational theory of mutual funds’ attention allocation. Econometrica 84(2):571–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaniel R, Saar G, Titman S (2008) Individual investor trading and stock returns. J. Finance 63(1):273–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelley EK, Tetlock PC (2013) How wise are crowds? Insights from retail orders and stock returns. J. Finance 68(3):1229–1265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee CM, Ready MJ (1991) Inferring trade direction from intraday data. J. Finance 46(2):733–746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lou D (2008) Attracting investor attention through advertising. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(6):1797–1829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loughran T, Schultz P (2005) Liquidity: Urban vs. rural firms. J. Financial Econom. 78(2):341–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malloy C (2005) The geography of equity analysis. J. Finance 60(2):719–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mondria J, Wu T (2010) The puzzling evolution of the home bias, information processing and financial openness. J. Econom. Dynamic Control 34(5):875–896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mondria J, Wu T, Zhang Y (2010) The determinants of international investment and attention allocation: Using internet search query data. J. Internat. Econom. 82(1):85–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagel S (2005) Short sales, institutional investors and the cross-section of stock returns. J. Financial Econom. 78(2):277–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pastor L, Stambaugh R (2003) Liquidity risk and expected stock returns. J. Political Econom. 111(3):642–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng L, Xiong W (2006) Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning. J. Financial Econom. 80(3):563–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pirinsky C, Wang Q (2006) Does corporate headquarters location matter for stock returns? J. Finance 61(4):1991–2015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Portes R, Rey H (2005) The determinants of cross border equity flows. J. Internat. Econom. 65(2):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reed AV (2013) Short selling. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 5:245–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seasholes MS, Zhu N (2010) Individual investors and local bias. J. Finance 65(5):1987–2010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tetlock PC (2010) Does public financial news resolve asymmetric information? Rev. Financial Stud. 23(9):3520–3557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uysal V, Kedia S, Panchapagesan V (2008) Geography and acquirer returns. J. Financial Intermediation 17(2):256–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Nieuwerburgh S, Veldkamp L (2009) Information immobility and the home bias puzzle. J. Finance 64(3):1187–1215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Nieuwerburgh S, Veldkamp L (2010) Information acquisition and under-diversification. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(2):779–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanden J (2008) Information quality and options. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(6):2635–2676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yuan K (2005) Asymmetric price movements and borrowing constraints: A rational expectations equilibrium model of crises, contagion, and confusion. J. Finance 60(1):379–411.Crossref, Google Scholar