Do You Mind Me Paying Less? Measuring Other-Regarding Preferences in the Market for Taxis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3483

References

  • Al-Ubaydli O, List JA (2019) How natural field experiments have enhanced our understanding of unemployment. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3:33–39.Google Scholar
  • Ayres I, Siegelman P (1995) Race and gender discrimination in bargaining for a new car. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(3):304–321.Google Scholar
  • Balafoutas L, Beck A, Kerschbamer R, Sutter M (2013) What drives taxi drivers? A field experiment on fraud in a market for credence goods. Rev. Econom. Stud. 80(3):876–891.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2005) Social preferences and the response to incentives: Evidence from personnel data. Quart. J. Econom. 120(3):917–962.Google Scholar
  • Becker GS (1971) The Economics of Discrimination, 2nd ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benson PL, Karabenick SA, Lerner RM (1976) Pretty pleases: The effects of physical attractiveness, race, and sex on receiving help. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 12(5):409–415.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benz M, Meier S (2008) Do people behave in experiments as in the field? Evidence from donations. Experiment. Econom. 11(3):268–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):991–1013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C, Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Thaler R (1997) Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):407–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C, Fehr E ( 2004) Measuring social norms and preferences using experimental games: A guide for social scientists. Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H, eds. Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-Scale Societies (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 55–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C, Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Thaler R (1997) Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):407–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castillo M, Petrie R, Torero M, Vesterlund L (2013) Gender differences in bargaining outcomes: A field experiment on discrimination. J. Public Econom. 99(March):35–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen R, Chen Y (2011) The potential of social identity for equilibrium selection. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2562–2589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Li SX (2009) Group identity and social preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):431–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper D, Kagel JH (2009) Other-regarding preferences: A selective survey of experimental results. Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 217–289.Google Scholar
  • DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):1–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drouvelis M, Nosenzo D (2013) Group identity and leading-by-example. J. Econom. Psych. 39(December):414–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dufwenberg M, Heidhues P, Kirchsteiger G, Riedel F, Sobel J (2011) Other-regarding preferences in general equilibrium. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(2):613–639.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, List J, Price MK (2015) Toward an understanding of why people discriminate: Evidence from a series of natural field experiments. NBER Working Paper No. 17855, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Goette L, Huffman D, Meier S (2006) The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement: Evidence using random assignment to real social groups. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(2):212–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guala F, Filippin A (2017) The effect of group identity on distributive choice: Social preference or heuristic? Econom. J.127(602):1047–1068.Google Scholar
  • Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J. Econom. Lit. 42(4):1009–1055.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman JJ (1998) Detecting discrimination. J. Econom. Perspect. 12(2):101–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Statist. 6(2):65–70.Google Scholar
  • Landry CE, Lange A, List JA, Price MK, Rupp NG (2006) Toward an understanding of the economics of charity: Evidence from a field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):747–782.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt SD (2004) Testing theories of discrimination: Evidence from the weakest link. J. Law Econom. 47(2):431–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • List JA (2004) The nature and extent of discrimination in the marketplace: Evidence from the field. Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):49–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • List JA (2006) The behavioralist meets the market: Measuring social preferences and reputation effects in actual transactions. J. Political Econom. 114(1):1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maguire EA, Gadian DG, Johnsrude IS, Good CD, Ashburner J, Frackowiak RS, Frith CD (2000) Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97(8):4398–4403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitra A, Ray D (2014) Implications of economic theory of conflict: Hindu–Muslim violence in India. J. Political Econom. 122(4):719–765.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mobius MM, Rosenblat TS (2006) Why beauty matters. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):222–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mujcic R, Frijters P (2013) Still not allowed on the bus: It matters if you’re black or white! IZA Discussion Paper 7300, IZA, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Öhman A (1986) Face the beast and fear the face: Animal and social fears as prototypes for evolutionary analyses of emotion. Psychophysiology 23(2):123–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phelps ES (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(4):659–661.Google Scholar
  • Schneider HS (2012) Agency problems and reputation in expert services: Evidence from auto repair. J. Indust. Econom. 60(3):406–433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schupp HT, Öhman A, Junghöfer M, Weike AI, Stockburger J, Hamm AO (2004) The facilitated processing of threatening faces: An ERP analysis. Emotion 4(2):189–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stoop J (2014) From the laboratory to the field: Envelopes, dictators and manners. Experiment. Econom. 17(2):304–313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stoop J, Noussair CN, Van Soest D (2012) From the laboratory to the field: Cooperation among fishermen. J. Political Econom. 120(6):1027–1056.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel H, Billig MG, Bundy RP, Flament C (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 1(2):149–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Der Mewe GW, Burns J (2008) What’s in a name? Racial identity and altruism in post-apartheid South Africa. South African J. Econom. 76(2):266–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winking J, Mizer N (2013) Natural-field dictator game shows no altruistic giving. Evolution Human Behav. 34(4):288–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xiao E, Houser D (2005) Emotion expression in human punishment behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(20):7398–7401.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zizzo DJ (2010) Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 13(1):75–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zizzo DJ (2012) Inducing natural group identity: A RDP analysis. University of East Anglia Discussion Paper 12-03, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.