Impatience and Time Inconsistency in Discounting Models

References

• Ainslie G (1975) Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psych. Bull. 82(4):463–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutström EE (2006) Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Experiment. Econom. 9(4):383–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutström EE (2014) Discounting behavior: A reconsideration. Eur. Econom. Rev. 71:15–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Sprenger C (2012) Estimating time preferences from convex budgets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3333–3356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Malmendier U (2006) Paying not to go to the gym. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(3):694–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebert JEJ, Prelec D (2007) The fragility of time: Time-insensitivity and valuation of the near and far future. Management Sci. 53(9):1423–1438.Link, Google Scholar
• Halevy Y (2015) Time consistency: Stationarity and time invariance. Econometrica 83(1):335–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herrnstein RJ (1990) Rational choice theory: Necessary but not sufficient. Amer. Psych. 45(3):356–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoch SJ, Loewenstein GF (1991) Time inconsistent preferences and consumer self-control. J. Consumer Res. 17(4):492–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirby KN, Maraković NN (1996) Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 3(1):100–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koopmans TC (1960) Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28(2):287–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):442–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazur JE (1987) An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. Commons ML, Mazur JE, Nevin JA, Rachlin H, eds. Quantitative Analyses of Behavior: The Effect of Delay and of Intervening Events on Reinforcement Value, vol. 5 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 55–73.Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999) Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D (2004) Decreasing impatience: A criterion for non-stationary time preference and “hyperbolic” discounting. Scandinavian J. Econom. 106(3):511–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Frederick S, Airoldi M (2012) Four days later in Cincinnati: Longitudinal tests of hyperbolic discounting. Acta Psychologica 140(2):177–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1937) A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econom. Stud. 4(2):155–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sayman S, Oncüler A (2009) An investigation of time inconsistency. Management Sci. 55(3):470–482.Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler R (1981) Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econom. Lett. 8(3):201–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Slovic P, Kahneman D (1990) The causes of preference reversal. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(1):204–217.Google Scholar
• Zauberman G, Kim BK, Malkoc SA, Bettman JR (2009) Discounting time and time discounting: Subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences. J. Marketing Res. 46(4):543–556.Crossref, Google Scholar