Network Trust and Trust Behaviors Among Executives in Supply Chain Interactions

References

• Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1977) Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psych. Bull. 84(5):888–918.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersson M (2012) Dispositional optimism and the emergence of social network diversity. Sociol. Quart. 53(1):92–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf N, Bohnet I, Piankov N (2006) Decomposing trust and trustworthiness. Experiment. Econom. 9(3):193–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beer R, Ahn H, Leider S (2018) Can trustworthiness in a supply chain be signaled? Management Sci. 64(9):3974–3994.Link, Google Scholar
• Beil D, Leider S, Li J (2018) Team decision making in operations management. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Ben-Ner A, Halldorsson F (2010) Trusting and trustworthiness: What are they, how to measure them, and what affects them. J. Econom. Psych. 31(1):64–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blalock H (1971) Aggregation and measurement error. Soc. Forces 50(2):151–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton G, Ockenfels A, Thonemann U (2012) Managers and students as newsvendors. Management Sci. 58(12):2225–2233.Link, Google Scholar
• Bonacich P (1987) Power and centrality: A family of measures. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(5):1170–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S, Cross R (2003) A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. 49(4):432–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S, Everett M, Freeman L (2002) UCINET VI User Manual (Analytic Technologies, Columbia, SC).Google Scholar
• Brehm J, Rahn W (1997) Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. Amer. J. Political Sci. 41(3):999–1023.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrnes J, Miller D, Schafer W (1999) Gender differences in risk raking: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 125(3):367–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C (2003) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Chua R, Ingram P, Morris M (2008) From the head and the heart: Locating cognition- and affect-based trust in managers’ professional networks. Acad. Management J. 51(3):436–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark M, Mills J (1979) Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(1):12–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark M, Mills J, Powell M (1986) Keeping track of needs in communal and exchange relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(2):333–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen M, Ho T, Ren Z, Terwiesch C (2003) Measuring imputed cost in the semiconductor equipment supply chain. Management Sci. 49(12):1653–1670.Link, Google Scholar
• Cook J, Wall T (1980) New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need nonfulfillment. J. Occupational Psych. 53(1):39–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R, Cummings J (2004) Tie and network correlates of performance in knowledge intensive work. Acad. Management J. 47(6):928–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunn J, Ruedy N, Schweitzer M (2012) It hurts both ways: How social comparisons harm affective and cognitive trust. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 117(1):2–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J (1996) Does governance matter? Keiretsu alliances and asset specificity as sources of Japanese competitive advantage. Organ. Sci. 7(6):649–666.Link, Google Scholar
• Erat S, Gneezy U (2012) White lies. Management Sci. 58(4):723–733.Link, Google Scholar
• Ferrin D, Dirks K, Shah P (2006) Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):870–883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman L (1979) Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1(3):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fulmer C, Gelfand M (2012) At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. J. Management 38(4):1167–1230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky A, Maddux W, Gilin D, White J (2008) Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent. Psych. Sci. 19(4):378–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• General Social Survey (2016) GSS questionnaires – 2016 GSS Ballot 2. Accessed October 16, 2019, http://gss.norc.org/Get-Documentation/questionnaires.Google Scholar
• Glaeser E, Laibson D, Scheinkman J, Soutter C (2000) Measuring trust. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):811–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (2005) Deception: The role of consequences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(1):384–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hammond J (1994) Barilla SpA (A). Harvard Business School Case 9-694-046 (revised March 2008). Accessed November 4, 2019, https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=22411.Google Scholar
• Hardin R (2002) Trust and Trustworthiness (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Hart O, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1119–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg M (2007) Uncertainty–identity theory. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 39(1):69–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg M, Terry D (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inderfurth K, Sadrieh A, Voigt G (2013) The impact of information sharing on supply chain performance under asymmetric information. Production Oper. Management 22(2):410–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1972) Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psych. 3(3):430–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Meuller C (1978) Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to do it. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 07-013, Sage Publications Inc., Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
• Kline P (2000) The Handbook of Psychological Testing, 2nd ed. (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Kossinets G (2006) Effects of missing data in social networks. Soc. Networks 28(3):247–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazzarini S, Miller G, Zenger T (2008) Dealing with the paradox of embeddedness: The role of contracts and trust in facilitating movement out of committed relationships. Organ. Sci. 19(5):709–728.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee H, Padmanabhan V, Whang S (1997) Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. 43(4):546–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis J, Weigert A (1985) Trust as a social reality. Soc. Forces 63(4):967–985.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindskold S (1978) Trust development, the GRIT proposal, and the effects of conciliatory acts on conflict and cooperation. Psych. Bull. 85(4):772–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra D (2004) Trust and reciprocity decisions: The differing perspectives of trustors and trusted parties. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 94(2):61–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden P (1990) Network data and measurement. Annual Rev. Sociol. 16:435–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAllister D (1995) Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Management J. 38(1):24–59.Google Scholar
• McEvily B, Tortoriello M (2011) Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations. J. Trust Res. 1(1):23–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McEvily B, Perrone V, Zaheer A (2003) Trust as an organizing principle. Organ. Sci. 14(1):91–103.Link, Google Scholar
• McEvily B, Radzevick J, Weber R (2012) Whom do you distrust and how much does it cost? An experiment on the measurement of trust. Games Econom. Behav. 74(1):285–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight D, Cummings L, Chervany N (1998) Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):473–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milliken F (1987) Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. 12(1):133–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montmarquette C, Rullière JL, Villeval MC, Zeiliger R (2004) Redesigning teams and incentives in a merger: An experiment with managers and students. Management Sci. 50(10):1379–1389.Link, Google Scholar
• Mullin B, Hogg M (1999) Motivations for group membership: The role of subjective importance and uncertainty reduction. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 2(2):91–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nee V, Holm HJ, Opper S (2018) Learning to trust: From relational exchange to generalized trust in China. Organ. Sci. 29(5):969–986.Link, Google Scholar
• Organ D (1988) Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA).Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Wei W (2006) Strategic commitments for an optimal capacity decision under asymmetric forecast information. Management Sci. 52(8):1239–1258.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2017) Establishing trust and trustworthiness in supply chain information sharing. Ha AY, Tang CS, eds. Handbook of Information Exchange in Supply Chain Management (Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Basel, Switzerland), 287–312.Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2019) Trust and trustworthiness. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ), 489–523.Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Subramanian U, Wang Y (2018) Information sharing, advice provision or delegation: What leads to higher trust and trustworthiness? Management Sci. 64(1):474–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Chen KY (2011) Trust in forecast information sharing. Management Sci. 57(6):1111–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Ren Y (2014) Trust, trustworthiness, and information sharing in supply chains bridging China and the United States. Management Sci. 60(10):2435–2460.Link, Google Scholar
• Paruchuri S (2010) Intraorganizational networks, interorganizational networks, and the impact of central inventors: A longitudinal study of pharmaceutical firms. Organ. Sci. 21(1):63–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Porter M (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Putnam R (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon & Schuster, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resnick P, Zeckhauser R, Swanson J (2006) The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Experiment. Econom. 9(2):79–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rousseau D, Sitkin S, Burt R, Camerer C (1998) Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):393–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scheele L, Thonemann U, Slikker M (2018) Designing incentive systems for truthful forecast information sharing within a firm. Management Sci. 64(8):3690–3713.Link, Google Scholar
• Shipilov A, Li S, Greve H (2011) The prince and the pauper: Search and brokerage in the initiation of status-heterophilous ties. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1418–1434.Link, Google Scholar
• Simchi-Levi D, Kaminsky P, Simchi-Levi E (2007) Designing & Managing the Supply Chain, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill Education, New York).Google Scholar
• Snijders C, Keren G (1999) Determinants of trust. Budescu D, Erev I, Zwick R, eds. Games & Human Behavior: Essays in Honor of Amnon Rapoport (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah, NJ), 355–386.Google Scholar
• Spiliotopoulou E, Donohue K, Gürbüz M (2016) Information reliability in supply chains: The case of multiple retailers. Production Oper. Management 25(3):548–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart K (2003) Trust transfer on the World Wide Web. Organ. Sci. 14(1):5–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Stoker T (2008) Aggregation: Econometrics. Blume L, Durlauf S, eds. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Tirole J (1999) Incomplete contracts: Where do we stand? Econometrica 67(4):741–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Triandis H, Bontempo R, Villareal M (1988) Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(2):323–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uslaner E, Brown M (2005) Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. Amer. Political Res. 33(6):868–894.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• World Values Survey (2015) 1981–2014 longitudinal aggregate v.20150418, aggregate data file produced by JDSystems, Madrid, Spain. Accessed October 16, 2019, http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org.Google Scholar
• Yamagishi T, Yamagishi M (1994) Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation Emotion 18(2):129–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yamagishi T, Jin N, Miller A (1998) In-group bias and culture of collectivism. Asian J. Soc. Psych. 1(3):315–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yamagishi T, Akutsu S, Cho K, Inoue Y, Li Y, Matsumoto Y (2015) Two-component model of general trust: Predicting behavioral trust from attitudinal trust. Soc. Cognition 33(5):436–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V (1998) Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. 9(2):141–159.Link, Google Scholar
• Zipkin P (2012) A reply to Williamson’s “Outsourcing …”. Production Oper. Management 21(3):465–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker L (1986) Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Staw B, Cummings L, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 8 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 53–111.Google Scholar