The Effect of Patent Protection on Inventor Mobility

References

• Akcigit U, Baslandze S, Stantcheva S (2016) Taxation and the international mobility of inventors. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(10):2930–2981.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Ceccagnoli M (2006) Patent protection, complementary assets, and firms’ incentives for technology licensing. Management Sci. 52(2):293–308.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A (2017) The decline of science in corporate R&D. Strategic Management J. 39(1):3–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow K (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 29(3):155–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian N, Chang JW, Sakakibara M, Sivadasan J, Starr E (2018) Locked in? The enforceability of covenants not to compete and the careers of high-tech workers. U.S. Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Paper CES-WP-17-09, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Beck T, Demirguc-Kunt A, Maskimovic V (2005) Financial and legal constraints to growth: Does firm size matter? J. Finance 60(1):137–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Powell J (2004) Endogeneity in semiparametric binary response models. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(3):655–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell BA, Ganco M, Franco AM, Agarwal R (2012) Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effects on source firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(1):65–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Veugelers R, Arts S (2018) Mind the gap: Capturing value from basic research through combining mobile inventors and partnerships. Res. Policy 47(9):1811–1824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn I, Kortum S, Stern S (2003) Are all patent examiners created equal? Examiners, patent characteristics and litigation outcomes. Cohen W, Merril S, eds. Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy (National Academies Press, Washington, DC), 17–53.Google Scholar
• Fallick B, Fleischman C, Rebitzer J (2006) Job-hopping in Silicon Valley: Some evidence concerning the microfoundations of a high-technology cluster. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(3):472–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng J, Jaravel X (2020) Crafting intellectual property rights: Implications for patent assertion entities, litigation, and innovation. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 12(1):140–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8-9):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frakes M, Wasserman M (2016) Patent office cohorts. Duke Law J. 65(8):1601–1655.Google Scholar
• Galasso A, Schankerman M (2015) Patents and cumulative innovation: Causal evidence from the courts. Quart. J. Econom. 130(1):317–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganco M (2013) Cutting the Gordian knot: The effect of knowledge complexity on employee mobility and entrepreneurship. Strategic. Management J. 34(6):666–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganco M, Ziedonis R, Agarwal R (2015) More stars stay, but the brightest ones still leave: Job hopping in the shadow of patent enforcement. Strategic Management J. 36(5):659–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaulé P (2018) Patents and the success of venture-capital backed startups: Using examiner assignment to estimate causal effects. J. Indust. Econom. 66(2):350–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ge C, Huang K-W, Png I (2016) Engineer/scientist careers: Patents, online profiles, and misclassification bias. Strategic Management J. 37(1):232–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilson RJ (1999) The legal infrastructure of high technology industrial districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and covenants not to compete. New York Univ. Law Rev. 74(3):575–629.Google Scholar
• Graham SJ, Marco AC, Miller R (2018) The USPTO Patent Examination Research Data set: A window on patent processing. J. Econom. Management Strategy 27(3):554–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hegde D, Luo H (2018) Patent publication and the market for ideas. Management Sci. 64(2):652–672.Link, Google Scholar
• Heller M, Eisenberg R (1998) Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280(5364):698–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoisl K (2007) Tracing mobile inventors—The causality between inventor mobility and inventor productivity. Res. Policy 36(5):619–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hombert J, Matray A (2016) The real effects of lending relationships on innovative firms and inventor mobility. Rev. Financial Stud. 30(7):2413–2445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Marschke G (2005) Labor mobility of scientists, technological diffusion, and the firm’s patenting decision. RAND J. Econom. 36(2):298–317.Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn JM, Thompson NC (2019) How to measure and draw causal inferences with patent scope. Internat. J. Econom. Bus. 26(1):5–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lanjouw J, Schankerman M (2004) Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Econom. J. 114(495):441–465.Google Scholar
• Lemley M, Sampat B (2012) Examiner characteristics and patent office outcomes. Rev. Econom. Statist. 94(3):817–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (1994) The importance of patent scope: An empirical analysis. RAND J. Econom. 25(2):319–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li G-C, Lai R, D’Amour A, Doolin D, Sun Y, Torvik V, Yu A, Fleming L (2014) Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975–2010). Res. Policy 43(6):941–955.Google Scholar
• Mann W (2018) Creditor rights and innovation: Evidence from patent collateral. J. Financial Econom. 130(1):25–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marco AC, Sarnoff JD, deGrazia CA (2019) Patent claims and patent scope. Res. Policy 48(9):103790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marco A, Myers A, Graham S, D’Agostino P, Apple K (2015) The USPTO Patent Assignment Dataset: Descriptions and analysis. USPTO Working Paper 2015-2, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
• Marx M (2011) The firm strikes back: Non-compete agreements and the mobility of technical professionals. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 76(5):695–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx M, Strumsky D, Fleming L (2009) Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Management Sci. 55(6):875–889.Link, Google Scholar
• Merges RP (1999) The law and economics of employee inventions. Harvard J. Law Tech. 13(1):1–54.Google Scholar
• Moretti E, Wilson DJ (2017) The effect of state taxes on the geographical location of top earners: Evidence from star scientists. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(7):1858–1903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moser P (2011) Do patents weaken the localization of innovations? Evidence from world’s fairs. J. Econom. History 71(2):363–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palomeras N, Melero E (2010) Markets for inventors: Learning-by-hiring as a driver of mobility. Management Sci. 56(5):881–895.Link, Google Scholar
• Paruchuri S, Nerkar A, Hambrick DC (2006) Acquisition integration and productivity losses in the technical core: Disruption of inventors in acquired companies. Organ. Sci. 17(5):545–562.Link, Google Scholar
• Righi C, Simcoe T (2019) Patent examiner specialization. Res. Policy 48(1):137–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1990) Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Res. Policy 19(2):165–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampat B, Williams HL (2019) How do patents affect follow-on innovation? Evidence from the human genome. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(1):203–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Agrawal A (2011) Recruiting for ideas: How firms exploit the prior inventions of new hires. Management Sci. 57(1):129–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Song J, Almeida P, Wu G (2003) Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate inter-firm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. 49(4):351–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Starr E (2019) Consider this: Training, wages, and the enforceability of covenants not to compete. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 72(4):783–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starr E, Prescott JJ, Bishara N (2019) Noncompetes in the U.S. labor force. University of Michigan Law & Economics Research Paper 18-013, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Stock J, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Andrews D, ed. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models (Cambridge University Press, New York), 80–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Brewer MB (1998) Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):290–306.Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Torero M (2002) Labor mobility from academe to commerce. J. Labor Econom. 20(3):629–660.Crossref, Google Scholar