The Impact of Uniform Pricing Regulations on Incentives to Generate and Disclose Accounting Information

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3503

References

  • Alonso R, Camara O (2016) Persuading voters. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(11):3590–3605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arya A, Mittendorf B, Sudbury A (2015) Forward contracting and incentives for disclosure. Rev. Accounting Stud. 20(3):1093–1121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arya A, Mittendorf B, Yoon D (2018) Public disclosures in the presence of suppliers and competitors. Contemporary Accounting Res. 36(2):758–772.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagnoli M, Watts S (2015) Competitive intelligence and disclosure. RAND J. Econom. 46(4):709–729.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertomeu J, Magee R (2015) Mandatory disclosure and asymmetry in financial reporting. J. Accounting Econom. 59(2–3):284–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertomeu J, Vaysman I, Xue W (2019) Voluntary versus mandatory disclosure. Working paper, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
  • Bork R (1978) The Antitrust Paradox (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Darrough M (1993) Disclosure policy and competition: Cournot vs. Bertrand. Accounting Rev. 68(3):534–561.Google Scholar
  • DeGraba P (1990) Input market price discrimination and the choice of technology. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(5):1246–1253.Google Scholar
  • Friedman H, Heinle M (2016) Lobbying and uniform disclosure regulations. J. Accounting Res. 54(3):863–893.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman H, Hughes J, Michaeli B (2019) Optimal reporting when additional information might arrive. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  • Gal-Or E (1985) Information sharing in oligopoly. Econometrica 53(2):329–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gal-Or E (1986) Information transmission—Cournot and Bertrand equilibria. Rev. Econom. Stud. 53(1):85–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gao P (2010) Disclosure quality, cost of capital, and investor welfare. Accounting Rev. 85(1):1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gao P, Liang P (2013) Informational feedback, adverse selection, and optimal disclosure. J. Accounting Res. 51(5):1133–1158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golstman M, Pavlov G (2011) How to talk to multiple audiences. Games Econom. Behav. 72(1):100–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo L (2009) The benefits of downstream information acquisition. Marketing Sci. 28(3):457–471.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heinle M, Samuels D, Taylor D (2018) Proprietary costs and disclosure substitution: Theory and empirical evidence. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Inderst R, Valletti T (2009) Price discrimination in input markets. RAND J. Econom. 40(1):1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jansen J (2008) Information acquisition and strategic disclosure in oligopoly. J. Econom. Management Strategy 17(1):113–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz M (1987) The welfare effects of third-degree price discrimination in intermediate good markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 77(1):154–167.Google Scholar
  • Li L (2002) Information sharing in a supply chain with horizontal competition. Management Sci. 48(9):1196–1212.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li L, Zhang H (2008) Confidentiality and information sharing in supply chain coordination. Management Sci. 54(8):1467–1481.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Raith M (1996) A general model of information sharing in oligopoly. J. Econom. Theory 71(1):260–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sankar M (1995) Disclosure of predecision information in a duopoly. Contemporary Accounting Res. 11(2):829–859.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Valletti T (2003) Input price discrimination with downstream Cournot competitors. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 21(7):969–988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verrecchia R (2001) Essays on disclosure. J. Accounting Econom. 32(1–3):97–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yoshida Y (2000) Third-degree price discrimination in input markets: Output and welfare. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):240–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang H (2002) Vertical information exchange in a supply chain with duopoly retailers. Production Oper. Management 11(4):531–546.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.