Supply Chain Competition: A Market Game Approach

References

• Adida E, Bakshi N, DeMiguel V (2015) Supplier capacity and intermediary profits: Can less be more? Production Oper. Management 25(4):630–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adida E, DeMiguel V (2011) Supply chain competition with multiple manufacturers and retailers. Oper. Res. 59(1):156–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Bernstein F, de Vericourt F (2008) Competition for procurement contracts with service guarantees. Oper. Res. 56(3):562–575.Link, Google Scholar
• Bernstein F, Federgruen A (2003) Pricing and replenishment strategies in a distribution system with competing retailers. Oper. Res. 51(3):409–426.Link, Google Scholar
• Bernstein F, Federgruen A (2005) Decentralized supply chains with competing retailers under demand uncertainty. Management Sci. 51(1):18–29.Link, Google Scholar
• Bernstein F, Nagarajan M (2012) Competition and Cooperative Bargaining Models in Supply Chains (Now Publishers, Boston).Google Scholar
• Cabral LMB (2000) Industrial Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Kok AG (2010) Competing manufacturers in a retail supply chain: On contractual form and coordination. Management Sci. 56(3):571–589.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlton DW, Perloff JM (2015) Modern Industrial Organization (Pearson, London).Google Scholar
• Chen G, Korpeoglu CG, Spear SE (2017) Price stickiness and markup variations in market games. J. Math. Econom. 72:95–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cho S-H (2014) Horizontal mergers in multitier decentralized supply chains. Management Sci. 60(2):356–379.Link, Google Scholar
• Cho S-H, Wang X (2017) Newsvendor mergers. Management Sci. 63(2):298–316.Link, Google Scholar
• Chu LY, Rong Y, Zheng H (2018) Strategic benefit of request for proposal/quotation. Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Collard-Wexler A, Gowrisankaran G, Lee RS (2019) Nash-in-Nash bargaining: A microfoundation for applied work. J. Political Econom. 127(1):163–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbett CJ, Karmarkar US (2001) Competition and structure in serial supply chains with deterministic demand. Management Sci. 47(7):966–978.Link, Google Scholar
• Cournot AA (1838) Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des Richesses (Hachette, Paris).Google Scholar
• Crawford GS, Yorukoglu A (2012) The welfare effects of bundling in multichannel television markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(2):643–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubey P, Shubik M (1977) A closed economic system with production and exchange modelled as a game of strategy. J. Math. Econom. 4:253–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy J, Puzzello D (2014) Gift exchange vs. monetary exchange: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(6):1735–1776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farahat A, Huh WT, Li H (2019) On the relationship between quantity precommitment and Cournot games. Oper. Res. 67(1):109–122.Link, Google Scholar
• Federgruen A, Hu M (2017a) Competition in multi-echelon systems. Leading Developments from INFORMS Communities, INFORMS Tutorials Oper. Res., 178–211.Google Scholar
• Federgruen A, Hu M (2017b) The price and variety effects of vertical mergers. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Feng Q, Lu LX (2012) The strategic perils of low cost outsourcing. Management Sci. 58(6):1196–1210.Link, Google Scholar
• Feng Q, Lu LX (2013) Supply chain contracting under competition: Bilateral bargaining vs. Stackelberg. Production Oper. Managment 22(3):661–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt CA (1985) An experimental test of the consistent-conjectures hypothesis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):314–325.Google Scholar
• Korpeoglu CG (2016) The impact of cooperation and competition on consumer welfare. Working paper, University College London, London.Google Scholar
• Kreps DM, Scheinkman J (1983) Quantity precommitment and Bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomes. Bell J. Econom. 14(2):326–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuo C-W, Ahn H-S, Aydin G (2013) Pricing policy in a supply chain: Negotiation or posted pricing. Production Oper. Management 22(3):626–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee H, Whang S (2002) The impact of the secondary market on the supply chain. Management Sci. 48(6):719–731.Link, Google Scholar
• Lovejoy WS (2010) Bargaining chains. Management Sci. 56(12):2282–2301.Link, Google Scholar
• Majumder P, Srinivasan A (2008) Leadership and competition in network supply chains. Management Sci. 54(6):1189–1204.Link, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Gosain S, El Sawy OA (2007) Leveraging standard electronic business interfaces to enable adaptive supply chain partnerships. Inform. Systems Res. 18(3):260–279.Link, Google Scholar
• Nagarajan M, Bassok Y (2008) A bargaining framework in supply chains: The assembly problem. Management Sci. 54(8):1482–1496.Link, Google Scholar
• Nakkas A, Xu Y (2018) The impact of valuation heterogeneity on equilibrium prices in supply chain networks. Production Oper. Management 28(2):241–257.Google Scholar
• Nash JF (1950) The bargaining game. Econometrica. 18(2):155–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Netessine S (2009) Supply webs: Managing, organizing, and capitalizing on global networks of suppliers. Kleindorfer PR, Wind, YJ, eds. The Network Challenge: Strategy, Profit, and Risk in an Interlinked World (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 225–242.Google Scholar
• Netessine S, Zhang F (2005) Positive vs. negative externalities in inventory management: Implications for supply chain design. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 7(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
• OECD (1998) Buying power of multiproduct retailers. Accessed November 24, 2018, http://www.oecd.org/competition/abuse/2379299.pdf.Google Scholar
• OECD (2008) Monopsony and buyer power. Accessed November 24, 2018, http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/44445750.pdf.Google Scholar
• Peck J, Shell K (1991) Market uncertainty: Correlated and sunspot equilibria in imperfectly competitive economies. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58:1011–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perakis G, Roels G (2007) The price of anarchy in supply chains: Quantifying the efficiency of price-only contracts. Management Sci. 53(8):1249–1268.Link, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50(1):97–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapley LS, Shubik M (1977) Trade using one commodity as a means of payment. J. Political Econom. 85:937–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shea J (1993) Do supply curves slope up? Quart. J. Econom. 108(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spear SE (2003) The electricity market game. J. Econom. Theory 109(2):300–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang CS (2016) Making OM research more relevant: “Why?” and “how?” Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(2):178–183.Link, Google Scholar
• Tyagi RK (1999) On the effects of downstream entry. Management Sci. 45(1):59–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Aydin G, Heese HS (2017) Curbing the usage of conflict minerals: A supply network perspective. Working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar