Token-Weighted Crowdsourcing

References

• Acemoglu D, Bimpikis K, Ozdaglar A (2014) Dynamics of information exchange in endogenous social networks. Theoret. Econom. 9(1):41–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Dahleh MA, Lobel I, Ozdaglar A (2011) Bayesian learning in social networks. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(4):1201–1236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alaei S, Malekian A, Mostagir M (2016) A dynamic model of crowdfunding. Preprint, submitted February 26, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2737748.Google Scholar
• Araman VF, Caldentey R (2016) Crowdvoting the timing of new product introduction. Preprint, submitted January 27, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2723515.Google Scholar
• Asgaonkar A, Krishnamachari B (2018) Token curated registries—a game theoretic approach. Preprint, submitted September 5, https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.01756.Google Scholar
• Babich V, Hilary G (2020) OM Forum—Distributed ledgers and operations: What operations management researchers should know about blockchain technology. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(2):223–240.Google Scholar
• Babich V, Marinesi S, Tsoukalas G (2020) Does crowdfunding benefit entrepreneurs and venture capital investors? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Banzhaf JF III (1964) Weighted voting doesn’t work: A mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Rev. 19:317–343.Google Scholar
• Belavina E, Marinesi S, Tsoukalas G (2020) Rethinking crowdfunding platform design: mechanisms to deter misconduct and improve efficiency. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print May 22, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3482.Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Välimäki J (1997) Market diffusion with two-sided learning. RAND J. Econom. 28(4):773–795.Google Scholar
• Bhatia A, Giometti R (2018) Sapien: Decentralized social news platform. Accessed July 18, 2020, https://github.com/SapienNetwork/Sapien-White-Paper/blob/master/SPNv1_4.pdf.Google Scholar
• Biais B, Bisiere C, Bouvard M, Casamatta C (2019) The blockchain folk theorem. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5):1662–1715.Google Scholar
• Biais B, Bisiere C, Bouvard M, Casamatta C, Menkveld AJ (2018) Equilibrium bitcoin pricing. Preprint, submitted October 17, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3261063.Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Ehsani S, Mostagir M (2015) Designing dynamic contests. Oper. Res. 67(2):295–597.Google Scholar
• Cao S, Cong L W, Yang B (2018) Auditing and blockchains: Pricing, misstatements, and regulation. Preprint, submitted October 9, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3248002.Google Scholar
• Catalini C, Gans J (2017) Some simple economics of the blockchain. Research Paper No. 5191-16, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Chandrasekhar AG, Larreguy H, Xandri JP (2015) Testing models of social learning on networks: Evidence from a laboratory experiment in the field. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Chod J, Lyandres E (2018) A theory of ICOs: Diversification, agency, and information asymmetry. Working paper, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.Google Scholar
• Chod J, Trichakis N, Tsoukalas G, Aspegren H, Weber M (2020) On the financing benefits of supply chain transparency and blockchain adoption. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Christoffersen SE, Geczy CC, Musto DK, Reed AV (2007) Vote trading and information aggregation. J. Finance 62(6):2897–2929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colombo L, Femminis G, Pavan A (2014) Information acquisition and welfare. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(4):1438–1483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cong LW, Li Y, Wang N (2018) Tokenomics: Dynamic adoption and valuation. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Elkind E, Chalkiadakis G, Jennings NR (2008) Coalition structures in weighted voting games. Ghallab M, Spyropoulos CD, Fakotakis N, Avouris N, eds. Proc. 18th Eur. Conf. Artificial Intelligence (IOS Press, Amsterdam), 393–397.Google Scholar
• Eufemio AC, Chng KC, Djie S (2018) Digix’s whitepaper: The gold standard in crypto assets. Accessed September 28, 2019, https://digix.global/whitepaper.pdf.Google Scholar
• Even Y, Tahbaz-Salehi A, Vives X (2019) Information aggregation in heterogenous markets. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Gan J, Tsoukalas G, Netessine S (2020) Initial coin offerings, speculation, and asset tokenization. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Gifford DK (1979) Weighted voting for replicated data. Proc. Seventh ACM Sympos. Operating Systems Principles (ACM, New York), 150–162.Google Scholar
• Goldin M (2017) Token-curated registries 1.0. Accessed March 1, 2019, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BWWC__-Kmso9b7yCI_R7ysoGFIT9D_sfjH3axQsmB6E/.Google Scholar
• Goldin M, Soleimani A, Young J (2017) The AdChain registry. Accessed September 28, 2018, https://adtoken.com/uploads/white-paper.pdf.Google Scholar
• Goodman L (2014) Tezos—a self-amending crypto-ledger white paper. Report, The Tezos Foundation, Zug, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Hentschker L (2018) Decert. Accessed March 1, 2019, http://decert.io/.Google Scholar
• Hinzen FJ, John K, Saleh F (2019) Proof-of-work’s limited adoption problem. Report, Stern School of Business, New York.Google Scholar
• Iles M (2018) The Civil white paper. Accessed September 28, 2019, https://blog.joincivil.com/the-civil-white-paper-3e6c6f72dd9e.Google Scholar
• Jentzsch C (2016) The history of the Dao and lessons learned. Accessed September 28, 2018, https://blog.slock.it/the-history-of-the-dao-and-lessons-learned-d06740f8cfa5.Google Scholar
• Kim C (2019) Welcome to Athens: Tezos completes ‘historic’ first blockchain vote. Accessed March 1, 2019, https://www.coindesk.com/welcome-to-athens-tezos-completes-historic-first-blockchain-vote.Google Scholar
• Levit D, Malenko N (2011) Nonbinding voting for shareholder proposals. J. Finance 66(5):1579–1614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lockyer M (2018) Token curated registry (TCR) design patterns. Accessed September 28, 2019, https://hackernoon.com/token-curated-registry-tcr-design-patterns-4de6d18efa15.Google Scholar
• Lv D, Ashu (2018) Carbon vote. Accessed September 28, 2019, http://carbonvote.com/. Google Scholar
• Lv D, Ashu (2019) Vote: The DAO hard fork. Accessed April 22, 2019, http://v1.carbonvote.com/.Google Scholar
• Myatt DP, Wallace C (2012) Endogenous information acquisition in coordination games. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(1):340–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nordmann L, Pham H (1999) Weighted voting systems. IEEE Trans. Reliability 48(1):42–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrovsky M (2012) Information aggregation in dynamic markets with strategic traders. Econometrica 80(6):2595–2647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou Y, Bimpikis K, Savva N (2017) Crowdsourcing exploration. Management Sci. 64(4):1727–1746.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosen JB (1965) Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium points for concave N-person games. Econometrica 33(3):520–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosu I, Saleh F (2019) Evolution of shares in a proof-of-stake cryptocurrency. Working paper, HEC Paris, Paris.Google Scholar
• Saghafian S, Tomlin B, Biller S (2018) The Internet of things and information fusion: Who talks to who? Working Paper 3124417, Tuck School of Business, Hanover, NH.Google Scholar
• Saleh F (2018) Blockchain without waste: Proof-of-stake. Working paper, HEC Paris, Paris.Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1986) Large shareholders and corporate control. J. Political Econom. 94(3):461–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon R (2017) Curation markets. Accessed September 28, 2018, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VNkBjjGhcZUV9CyC0ccWYbqeOoVKT2maqX0rK3yXB20/edit.Google Scholar
• Snyder JM Jr, Ting MM, Ansolabehere S (2005) Legislative bargaining under weighted voting. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(4):981–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steem (2018) Steem: An incentivized, blockchain-based, public content platform. Accessed September 28, https://steem.io/steem-whitepaper.pdf.Google Scholar
• Stouras KI, Hutchison-Krupat J, Chao RO (2017) The role of participation in innovation contests. Working paper, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
• Strausz R (2017) A theory of crowdfunding: A mechanism design approach with demand uncertainty and moral hazard. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(6):1430–1476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor A, Zwicker W (1993) Weighted voting, multicameral representation, and power. Games Econom. Behav. 5(1):170–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Team Steemit (2019) 1,000,000 Steem accounts. Accessed July 18, 2020, https://bit.ly/2Co8BK7.Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Tong Z, Kain RY (1991) Vote assignments in weighted voting mechanisms. IEEE Trans. Comput. 40(5):664–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vives X (1988) Aggregation of information in large Cournot markets. Econometrica 56(4):851–876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vives X (2011) Strategic supply function competition with private information. Econometrica 79(6):1919–1966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warren W, Bandeali A (2018) 0x: An open protocol for decentralized exchange on the ethereum blockchain. Accessed September 28, 2019, https://0xproject.com/pdfs/0x_white_paper.pdf.Google Scholar
• Yermack D (2017) Corporate governance and blockchains. Rev. Finance 21(1): 7–31.Crossref, Google Scholar