When Corporate Social Responsibility Backfires: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment

References

• Angelucci M, Prina S, Royer H, Samek A (2016) When incentives backfire: Spillover effects in food choice. Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II:2016-205.Google Scholar
• Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (2016) Report to the Nations: Occupational Fraud and Abuse (Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Austin, TX).Google Scholar
• Backhaus KB, Stone BA, Heiner K (2002) Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Bus. Soc. 41(3):292–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagnoli M, Watts SG (2003) Selling to socially responsible consumers: Competition and the private provision of public goods. J. Econom. Management Strategy 12(3):419–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee R (2016) Corruption, norm violation and decay in social capital. J. Public Econom. 137(C):14–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2010) Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica 77(305):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2011) Identity, morals, and taboos: Beliefs as assets. Quart. J. Econom. 126(2):805–855.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg J (2016) Income security in the on-demand economy: Findings and policy lessons from a survey of crowdworkers. Comparative Labor Law Policy J. 37(3):543–576.Google Scholar
• Besley T, Ghatak M (2005) Competition and incentives with motivated agents. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(3):616–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Ghatak M (2007) Retailing public goods: The economics of corporate social responsibility. J. Public Econom. 91(9):1645–1663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanken I, van de Ven N, Zeelenberg M (2015) A meta-analytic review of moral licensing. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 41(4):540–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradler C, Dur R, Neckermann S, Non A (2016) Employee recognition and performance: A field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3085–3099.Link, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Cooper DJ (2006) A change would do you good… an experimental study on how to overcome coordination failure in organizations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(3):669–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brekke KA, Nyborg K (2008) Attracting responsible employees: Green production as labor market screening. Resource Energy Econom. 30(4):509–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2019) Getting gig workers to do more by doing good: Field experimental evidence from online platform labor marketplaces. Organ. Environ, ePub ahead of print May 8, https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619846455.Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2016b) Social responsibility messages and worker wage requirements: Field experimental evidence from online labor marketplaces. Organ. Sci. 27(4):1010–1028.Link, Google Scholar
• Cascio J, Plant EA (2015) Prospective moral licensing: Does anticipating doing good later allow you to be bad now? J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 56(January):110–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cason TN, Gangadharan L (2013). Cooperation spillovers and price competition in experimental markets. Econom. Inquiry 51(3):1715–1730.Google Scholar
• Cassar L, Meier S (2017) Intentions for Doing Good Matter for Doing Well: The (Negative) Signaling Value of Prosocial Incentives (No. 11203) (Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiou WB, Wan CS, Wu WH, Lee KT (2011) A randomized experiment to examine unintended consequences of dietary supplement use among daily smokers: Taking supplements reduces self-regulation of smoking. Addiction 106(12):2221–2228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clot S, Grolleau G, Ibanez L (2014) Smug alert! Exploring self-licensing behavior in a cheating game. Econom. Lett. 123(2):191–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conway P, Peetz J (2012) When does feeling moral actually make you a better person? Conceptual abstraction moderates whether past moral deeds motivate consistency or compensatory behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 38(7):907–919.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Du S, Bhattacharya CB, Sen S (2011) Corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage: Overcoming the trust barrier. Management Sci. 57(9):1528–1545.Link, Google Scholar
• Effron DA, Miller DT, Monin B (2012) Inventing racist roads not taken: The licensing effect of immoral counterfactual behaviors. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 103(6):916–932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Effron DA, Monin B, Miller DT (2013) The unhealthy road not taken: Licensing indulgence by exaggerating counterfactual sins. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(3):573–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elfenbein DW, Fisman R, Mcmanus B (2012) Charity as a substitute for reputation: Evidence from an online marketplace. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(4):1441–1468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisman R, Heal G, Nair VB (2008) A model of corporate philanthropy. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Flory JA, Leibbrandt A, List JA (2016) The effects of wage contracts on workplace misbehaviors: Evidence from a call center natural field experiment. NBER Working Paper No. w22342, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Greening DW, Turban DB (2000) Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Bus. Soc. 39(3):254–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gubler T, Larkin I, Pierce L (2018) Doing well by making well: The impact of corporate wellness programs on employee productivity. Management Sci. 64(11):4967–4987.Link, Google Scholar
• Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J. Econom. Literature 42(4):1009–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedblom D, Hickman BR, List JA (2016) Toward an understanding of corporate social responsibility: Theory and field experimental evidence. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Jordan J, Mullen E, Murnighan JK (2011) Striving for the moral self: The effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 37(5):701–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kish-Gephart JJ, Harrison DA, Treviño LK (2010) Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. J. Appl. Psych. 95(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kitzmueller M, Shimshack J (2012) Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. J. Econom. Literature 50(1):51–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kosfeld M, Neckermann S (2011) Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3(3):86–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kouchaki M, Jami A (2018) Everything we do, you do: The licensing effect of prosocial marketing messages on consumer behavior. Management Sci. 64(1):102–111.Link, Google Scholar
• KPMG (2015) KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2015 (KPMG, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Kube S, Maréchal MA, Puppe C (2012) The currency of reciprocity - gift-exchange in the workplace. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(4):1644–1662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lii YS, Lee M (2012) Doing right leads to doing well: When the type of CSR and reputation interact to affect consumer evaluations of the firm. J. Bus. Ethics 105(1):69–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA, Momeni F (2017) When corporate social responsibility backfires: Theory and evidence from a natural field experiment. NBER Working Paper No. w24169, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• List JA, Sadoff S, Wagner M (2011) So you want to run an experiment, now what? Some simple rules of thumb for optimal experimental design. Experiment. Econom. 14(4):439–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazar N, Zhong CB (2010) Do green products make us better people? Psych. Sci. 21(4):494–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merritt AC, Effron DA, Monin B (2010) Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad empirical demonstrations of moral self-licensing. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 4(5):344–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Retail Federation (2015) National retail security survey 2015. Report, Department of Sociology and the Center for Studies in Criminology and Law, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
• Ockenfels A, Sliwka D, Werner P (2015) Timing of kindness - Evidence from a field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 111(March):79–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG (2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment Decision Making 5(5):411–419.Google Scholar
• Ross J, Irani L, Silberman M, Zaldivar A, Tomlinson B (2010). Who are the crowdworkers?: Shifting demographics in Mechanical Turk. CHI’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM, New York), 2863–2872.Google Scholar
• Sachdeva S, Iliev R, Medin DL (2009) Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psych. Sci. 20(4):523–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen S, Bhattacharya CB, Korschun D (2006) The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 34(2):158–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiefenbeck V, Staake T, Roth K, Sachs O (2013) For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Energy Policy 57(June):160–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tonin M, Vlassopoulos M (2014) Corporate philanthropy and productivity: Evidence from an online real effort experiment. Management Sci. 61(8):1795–1811.Link, Google Scholar
• Turban DB, Greening DW (1997) Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad. Management J. 40(3):658–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urbszat D, Herman CP, Polivy J (2002) Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we diet: Effects of anticipated deprivation on food intake in restrained and unrestrained eaters. J. Abnormal Psych. 111(2):396–401.Crossref, Google Scholar