How Do Product Attributes and Reviews Moderate the Impact of Recommender Systems Through Purchase Stages?

References

• Adomavicius G, Bockstedt J, Curley S, Zhang J (2011) Recommender systems, consumer preferences, and anchoring effects. RecSys 2011 Workshop Human Decision Making Recommender Systems (Elsevier, New York), 35–42.Google Scholar
• Adomavicius G, Bockstedt JC, Curley SP, Zhang J (2014) Do recommender systems manipulate consumer preferences? A study of anchoring effects. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):956–975.Google Scholar
• Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 17(6):734–749.Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, P, Vaidyanathan R (2005) Perceived effectiveness of recommendation agent routines: search vs. experience goods. Internat. J. Internet Marketing Advertising 2(1–2):38–55.Google Scholar
• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C (2008) The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More (Hyperion Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Animesh A, Ramachandran V, Viswanathan S (2010) Quality uncertainty and the performance of online sponsored search markets: an empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 21(1):190–201.Google Scholar
• Arnold MJ, Reynolds KE (2003) Hedonic shopping motivations. J. Retailing 79(2):77–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babin BJ, Darden WR, Griffin M (1994) Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. J. Consumer Res. 20(4):644–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagwell K (2007) The economic analysis of advertising. Armstrong M, Porter R, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 3 (Elsevier, New York), 1701–1844.Google Scholar
• Bart Y, Stephen AT, Sarvary M (2014) Which products are best suited to mobile advertising? A field study of mobile display advertising effects on consumer attitudes and intentions. J. Marketing Res. 51(3):270–285.Google Scholar
• Benbasat I, Todd P (1996) The effects of decision support and task contingencies on model formulation: a cognitive perspective. Decision Support Systems 17(4):241–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I, Wang W (2005) Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 6(3):72–101.Google Scholar
• Berger J (2014) Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. J. Consumer Psych. 24(4):586–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodapati AV (2008) Recommendation systems with purchase data. J. Marketing Res. 45(1):77–93.Google Scholar
• Butters G (1977) Equilibrium distributions of sales and advertising prices. Rev. Econom. Stud. 44(3):465–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caudill SB (1988) Practitioners corner: an advantage of the linear probability model over probit or logit. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 50(4):425–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang C-C, Chin Y-C (2010) The impact of recommendation sources on online purchase intentions: the moderating effects of gender and perceived risk. World Acad. Sci. Engrg. Tech. 66(4):111–114.Google Scholar
• Chen P-Y, Chou Y-C, Kauffman RJ (2009) Community-based recommender systems: analyzing business models from a systems operator’s perspective. HICSS’09 42nd Hawaii Internat. Conf. Systems Sci. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1–10.Google Scholar
• Chen P-Y, Wu S-Y, Yoon J (2004) The impact of online recommendations and consumer feedback on sales. 25th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, 711–723.Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Xie J (2008) Online consumer review: word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Sci. 54(3):477–491.Link, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word-of-mouth on sales: online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Google Scholar
• Chiu C-M, Wang ET, Fang Y-H, Huang H-Y (2014) Understanding customers’ repeat purchase intentions in B2C e-commerce: the roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk. Inform. Systems J. 24(1):85–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi J, Lee HJ, Kim YC (2011) The influence of social presence on customer intention to reuse online recommender systems: the roles of personalization and product type. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 16(1):129–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemons EK (2008) How information changes consumer behavior and how consumer behavior determines corporate strategy. J. Management Inform. Systems 25(2):13–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dai H, Chan C, Mogilner C (2014) ‘Don’t tell me what to do!’ People rely less on consumer reviews for experiential than material purchases. Gneezy A, Griskevicius V, Williams P, eds. Advances in Consumer Research (Association for Consumer Research, Duluth, MN), 302–306.Google Scholar
• Das AS, Datar M, Garg A, Rajaram S (2007) Google news personalization: scalable online collaborative filtering. Proc. 16th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 271–280.Google Scholar
• De P, Hu Y, Rahman MS (2010) Technology usage and online sales: An empirical study. Management Sci. 56(11):1930–1945.Link, Google Scholar
• De P, Hu Y, Rahman MS (2013) Product-oriented web technologies and product returns: An exploratory study. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):998–1010.Google Scholar
• Dhar R, Wertenbroch K (2000) Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. J. Marketing Res. 37(1):60–71.Google Scholar
• Dias MB, Locher D, Li M, El-Deredy W, Lisboa PJ (2008) The value of personalised recommender systems to e-business: A case study. Proc. 2008 ACM Conf. Recommender Systems (ACM, New York), 291–294.Google Scholar
• Dimoka A, Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2012) On product uncertainty in online markets: theory and evidence. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(2):395–426.Google Scholar
• Duan W, Gu B, Whinston AB (2008) Do online reviews matter? An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems 45(4):1007–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Econsultancy and Monetate (2013) The realities of online personalization. Technical report, Econsultancy and Monetate, Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
• Feick L, Higie RA (1992) The effects of preference heterogeneity and source characteristics on ad processing and judgements about endorsers. J. Advertising 21(2):9–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleder D, Hosanagar K (2009) Blockbuster culture’s next rise or fall: the effect of recommender systems on sales diversity. Management Sci. 55(5):697–712.Link, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Selten R (2002) Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girard T, Dion P (2010) Validating the search, experience, and credence product classification framework. J. Bus. Res. 63(9):1079–1087.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girard T, Korgaonkar P, Silverblatt R (2003) Relationship of type of product, shopping orientations, and demographics with preference for shopping on the Internet. J. Bus. Psychol. 18(1):101–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011) Online display advertising: targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Sci. 30(3):389–404.Link, Google Scholar
• Greevy R, Silber JH, Cnaan A, Rosenbaum PR (2004) Randomization inference with imperfect compliance in the ACE-inhibitor after anthracycline randomized trial. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 99(465):7–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu B, Park J, Konana P (2012) Research note: the impact of external word-of-mouth sources on retailer sales of high-involvement products. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):182–196.Google Scholar
• Hann I-H, Terwiesch C (2003) Measuring the frictional costs of online transactions: the case of a name-your-own-price channel. Management Sci. 49(11):1563–1579.Link, Google Scholar
• Hartigan, JA (1975) Clustering Algorithms (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Häubl G, Murray KB (2003) Preference construction and persistence in digital marketplaces: the role of electronic recommendation agents. J. Consumer Psych. 13(1–2):75–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Häubl G, Murray KB (2006) Double agents: assessing the role of electronic product recommendation systems. Sloan Management Rev. 47(3):8–12.Google Scholar
• Häubl G, Trifts V (2000) Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: the effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Sci. 19(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinz JDO, Eckert D-KJ (2010) The impact of search and recommendation systems on sales in electronic commerce. Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 2(2):67–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschman EC, Holbrook MB (1982) Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. J. Marketing 46(3):92–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2014) Product fit uncertainty in online markets: nature, effects, and antecedents. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):328–344.Google Scholar
• Hosanagar K, Fleder D, Lee D, Buja A (2014) Will the global village fracture into tribes: recommender systems and their effects on consumers. Management Sci. 60(4):805–823.Link, Google Scholar
• Hsieh Y-C, Chiu H-C, Chiang M-Y (2005) Maintaining a committed online customer: a study across search-experience-credence products. J. Retailing 81(1):75–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang P, Lurie NH, Mitra S (2009) Searching for experience on the web: an empirical examination of consumer behavior for search and experience goods. J. Marketing 73(2):55–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacoby J, Olson JC, Haddock RA (1971) Price, brand name, and product composition characteristics as determinants of perceived quality. J. Appl. Psychol. 55(6):570–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jannach D, Hegelich K (2009) A case study on the effectiveness of recommendations in the mobile Internet. Proc. 3rd ACM Conf. Recommender Systems (ACM, New York), 205–208.Google Scholar
• Khan U, Dhar R, Wertenbroch K (2005) A behavioral decision theory perspective on hedonic and utilitarian choice. Ratneshwar S, Mick DG, eds. Inside Consumption: Frontiers of Research on Consumer Motives, Goals, and Desires (Taylor & Francis, New York), 144–165.Google Scholar
• Kim C, Galliers RD, Shin N, Ryoo J-H, Kim J (2012) Factors influencing Internet shopping value and customer repurchase intention. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 11(4):374–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein LR (1998) Evaluating the potential of interactive media through a new lens: search vs. experience goods. J. Bus. Res. 41(3):195–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein LR, Ford GT (2003) Consumer search for information in the digital age: an empirical study of prepurchase search for automobiles. J. Interactive Marketing 17(3):29–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Komiak SX, Benbasat I (2004) Understanding customer trust in agent-mediated electronic commerce, web-mediated electronic commerce, and traditional commerce. Inform. Technol. Management 5(1–2):181–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Komiak SY, Benbasat I (2006) The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 30(4):941–960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan BC, Hartline MD (2001) Brand equity: is it more important in services? J. Services Marketing 15(5):328–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Hosanagar K (2019) Measuring the value of recommendation links on product demand. Information Systems Res. 30(3):819–838.Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Tan Y (2015) The demand effects of joint product advertising in online videos. Management Sci. 61(8):1921–1937.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee D, Hosanagar K (2014) Impact of recommender systems on sales volume and diversity. Proc. 2014 Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Auckland, New Zealand, 1–15.Google Scholar
• Lee D, Hosanagar K (2016) When do recommender systems work the best? The moderating effects of product attributes and consumer reviews on recommender performance. Proc. 25th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web, 85–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee D, Hosanagar K (2019) How do recommender systems affect sales diversity? A cross-category investigation via randomized field experiment. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):239–259.Google Scholar
• Li X, Wu L (2013) Measuring effects of observational learning and social-network word-of-mouth (WOM) on the sales of daily-deal vouchers. 2013 46th Hawaii Internat. Conf. Systems Sci. (HICSS) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 2908–2917.Google Scholar
• Lin Z, Goh K-Y, Heng C-S (2017) The demand effects of product recommendation networks: an empirical analysis of network diversity and stability. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(2):397–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lunt M (2013) Selecting an appropriate caliper can be essential for achieving good balance with propensity score matching. Amer. J. Epidemiology 179(2):226–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maddala GS (1986) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Monetate (2013) Maximize online sales with product recommendations. Technical report, Monetate, Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
• Moore R, Punj G (2001) An investigation of agent assisted consumer information search: Are consumers better off? Adv. Consumer Res. 28(1):128.Google Scholar
• Nelson P (1970) Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. 78(2):311–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson P (1974) Advertising as information. J. Political Econom. 82(4):729–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oestreicher-Singer G, Sundararajan A (2012a) Recommendation networks and the long tail of electronic commerce. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(1):65–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oestreicher-Singer G, Sundararajan A (2012b) The visible hand? Demand effects of recommendation networks in electronic markets. Management Sci. 58(11):1963–1981.Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA (2003) Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 7(3):101–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarkar A (2011) Impact of utilitarian and hedonic shopping values on individual’s perceived benefits and risks in online shopping. Internat. Management Rev. 7(1):58–65.Google Scholar
• Sarwar B, Karypis G, Konstan J, Riedl J (2001) Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. Proc. 10th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 285–295.Google Scholar
• Senecal S, Nantel J (2004) The influence of online product recommendations on consumers online choices. J. Retailing 80(2):159–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiekermann S, Paraschiv C (2002) Motivating human–agent interaction: transferring insights from behavioral marketing to interface design. Electronic Commerce Res. 2(3):255–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stafford MR, Stafford TF, Day E (2002) A contingency approach: the effects of spokesperson type and service type on service advertising perceptions. J. Advertising 31(2):17–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strahilevitz MA, Myers J (1998) Donations to charity as purchase incentives: how well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. J. Consumer Res. 24(4):434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun M (2012) How does the variance of product ratings matter? Management Sci. 58(4):696–707.Link, Google Scholar
• Swaminathan V (2003) The impact of recommendation agents on consumer evaluation and choice: the moderating role of category risk, product complexity, and consumer knowledge. J. Consumer Psych. 13(1–2):93–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson C (2008) If you liked this, you’re sure to love that. New York Times (November 21), https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/23/magazine/23Netflix-t.html.Google Scholar
• To P-L, Liao C, Lin T-H (2007) Shopping motivations on Internet: a study based on utilitarian and hedonic value. Technovation 27(12):774–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Train KE (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C, Zhang J (2011) How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Sci. 57(5):828–842.Link, Google Scholar
• Weathers D, Sharma S, Wood SL (2007) Effects of online communication practices on consumer perceptions of performance uncertainty for search and experience goods. J. Retailing 83(4):393–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolinsky A (1983) Prices as signals of product quality. Rev. Econom. Stud. 50(4):647–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiao B, Benbasat I (2007) E-commerce product recommendation agents: use, characteristics, and impact. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 31(1):137–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Zhang X (2010) Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: the moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J. Marketing 74(2):133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar