A Perspective-Invariant Approach to Nash Bargaining

References

• Anbarci N, Bigelow JP (1994) The area monotonic solution to the cooperative bargaining problem. Math. Social Sci. 28(2):133–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Farias VF, Trichakisand N (2012) On the efficiency-fairness trade-off. Management Sci. 58(12):2234–2250.Link, Google Scholar
• Cao X (1982) Preference functions and bargaining solutions. Proc. 21st IEEE Conf. Decision Control, vol. 1 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 164–171.Google Scholar
• Chun Y (1988) The equal-loss principle for bargaining problems. Econom. Lett. 26(2):103–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhillon A (1998) Extended pareto rules and relative utilitarianism. Soc. Choice Welfare 15(4):521–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhillon A, Mertens JF (1999) Relative utilitarianism. Econometrica 67(3):471–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleurbaey M, Zuber S (2017) Fair utilitarianism. Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
• Haakea CJ, Qin CZ (2018) On unification of solutions to the bargaining problem. Preprint, submitted May 30, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3184007.Google Scholar
• Kalai E (1977) Nonsymmetric Nash solutions and replications of two-person bargaining. Internat. J. Game Theory 6(3):129–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalai E, Smorodinsky M (1975) Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica 43:513–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karagözoğlu E, Tok EÖ (2018) Iterated egalitarian compromise solution to bargaining problems and midpoint domination. Oper. Res. Lett. 46(3):282–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewicki RJ, Saunders DM, Barry B (2015) Negotiation, 7th ed. (McGraw-Hill Education, New York).Google Scholar
• Luce RD, Raiffa H (1957) Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Malhotra D, Bazerman M (2008) Negotiation Genius: How to Overcome Obstacles and Achieve Brilliant Results at the Bargaining Table and Beyond (Bantam, New York).Google Scholar
• Nash J (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2):155–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nydegger R, Owen G (1974) Two person bargaining: An experimental test of the Nash axioms. Internat. J. Game Theory 3(3):239–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perles MA, Maschler M (1981) The super-additive solution for the Nash bargaining game. Internat. J. Game Theory 10(3-4):163–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters H (1986) Simultaneity of issues and additivity in bargaining. Econometrica 54(1):153–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rachmilevitch S (2015) The Nash solution is more utilitarian than egalitarian. Theory Decision 79(3):463–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raiffa H (1953) Arbitration schemes for generalized two-person games. Kuhn HW, Tucker AW, eds. Contributions to the Theory of Games II (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 361–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth A (1977) Independence of irrelevant alternatives, and solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. J. Econom. Theory 16(2):241–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth A, Malouf MW (1979) Game-theoretic models and the role of information in bargaining. Psych. Rev. 86(6):574–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sobel J (1981) Distortion of utilities and the bargaining problem. Econometrica 49(3):597–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sobel J (2001) Manipulation of preferences and relative utilitarianism. Games Econom. Behav. 37(1):196–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomson W (2010) Bargaining and the Theory of Cooperative Games: John Nash and Beyond (Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Northampton, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Damme E (1986) The Nash bargaining solution is optimal. J. Econom. Theory 38(1):78–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu PL (1973) A class of solutions for group decision problems. Management Sci. 19(8):936–946.Link, Google Scholar