Underwriting Government Debt Auctions: Auction Choice and Information Production

References

• Aakvik A, Heckman JJ, Vytlacil EJ (2000) Treatment effects for discrete outcomes when responses to treatment vary among observationally identical persons: An application to Norwegian vocational rehabilitation programs. NBER Technical Working Paper No. 262, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Ausubel LM (2004) An efficient ascending-bid auction for multiple objects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(5):1452–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ausubel LM, Cramton P, Pycia M, Rostek M, Weretka M (2014) Demand reduction and inefficiency in multi-unit auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(4):1366–1400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Back K, Zender J (1993) Auctions of divisible goods: The rationale for the Treasury experiment. Rev. Financial Stud. 6(4):733–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandt M, Kavajcez K (2004) Price discovery in the US Treasury market. J. Finance 59(6):2623–2654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brenner M, Dan G, Sade O (2009) Sovereign debt auctions: Uniform or discriminatory? J. Monetary Econom. 56(2):267–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chari VV, Weber R (1992) How the U.S. Treasury should auction its debt? Federal Reserve Bank Minneapolis Quart. Rev. 16(4):3–12.Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R (1988) On a possible benefit to bid-takers from using multi-stage auctions. Management Sci. 34(9):1109–1120.Link, Google Scholar
• Fang LH (2005) Investment bank reputation and the price and quality of underwriting services. J. Finance 60(6):2729–2761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming M, Liu W (2016) Intraday pricing and liquidity effects of U.S. Treasury auctions. Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York.Google Scholar
• Fleming M, Sagar S, Sareen S (2016) Trading activity in the Indian bond market. Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York.Google Scholar
• Friedman M (1963) Price determination in the United States Treasury Bill market: A comment. Rev. Econom. Statist. 45(3):318–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldreich D (2007) Underpricing in discriminatory and uniform-price treasury auctions. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 42(2):443–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J (1976) The common structure of statistical models of truncation sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Ann. Econom. Soc. Measurement 5:475–492.Google Scholar
• Heckman J, Tobias JL, Vytlacil E (2007) Simple estimators for treatment parameters in a latent variable framework with an application to estimating the returns to schooling. NBER Working Paper No. 7950, National Bureau of Economic Research, Camridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hortaçsu A, McAdams A (2010) Mechanism choice and strategic bidding in divisible-good auctions: An empirical analysis of the Turkish Treasury auction market. J. Political Econom. 118(5):833–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hortaçsu A, Kastl J (2012) Valuing dealers' informational advantage: A study of Canadian treasury auctions. Econometrica 80(6):2511–2542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson MO, Kremer I (2006) The relevance of a choice of auction format in a competitive environment. Rev. Econom. Stud. 73(4):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katzman B (1999) A two stage sequential auction with multi-unit demands. J. Econom. Theory 86(1):77–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keloharju M, Nyborg K, Rydqvist K (2005) Strategic behavior and underpricing in uniform price auctions: Evidence from Finnish Treasury auctions. J. Finance 60(4):1865–1902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kremer I, Nyborg K (2004) Underpricing and market power in uniform price auctions. Rev. Financial Stud. 17(3):849–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee L (1978) Unionism and wage rates: A simultaneous equations model with qualitative and limited dependent variables. Internat. Econom. Rev. 19:415–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lou D, Yan H, Zhang J (2013) Anticipated and repeated shocks in liquid markets. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(8):1890–1912.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maddala C (1983) Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malvey P, Archibald C, Flynn S (1992) Uniform price auctions, evaluation of the treasury experience. Report, Office of Market Finance, US Treasury, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• McConnell J, Saretto A (2010) Auction failures and the market for auction rate securities. J. Financial Econom. 97:451–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom PR, Weber RJ (1982) A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica 50(5):1089–1122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nyborg K, Sundaresan S (1996) Discriminatory vs. uniform treasury auctions: Evidence from when-issued transactions (with Kjell Nyborg). J. Financial Econom. 42(1):105–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nyborg K, Rydqvist K, Sundaresan S (2002) Bidder behavior in multiunit auctions: Evidence from Swedish Treasury auctions. J. Political Econom. 110(2):394–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajaram S, Ghose P (2012) Indian G-Sec market—Emerging trends. CCIL Monthly Newsletter, November.Google Scholar
• Reserve Bank of India (2006) Revised scheme of underwriting commitment and liquidity support. Accessed February 10, 2020, https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=2804&Mode=0Google Scholar
• Rydqvist K, Wu M (2016) Pre auction inventory and bidding behavior. J. Financial Markets 30:78–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson R (1979) Auctions of shares. Quart. J. Econom. 93(4):675–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolridge J (2014) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ye L (2007) Indicative bidding and a theory of two-stage auctions. Games Econom. Behav. 58(1):181–207.Crossref, Google Scholar