Signaling Status: The Impact of Relative Income on Household Consumption and Financial Decisions

References

• Acemoglu D , Robinson J (2011) Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty (Crown Publishing Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D , Johnson S , Robinson J (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(5):1369–1401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackerman S , Sabelhaus J (2012) The effect of self-reported transitory income shocks on household spending. Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2012-64, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC. Accessed July 1, 2014, http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2012/201264/201264pap.pdf.Google Scholar
• Agarwal S , Mikhed V , Scholnick B (2020) Does the relative income of peers cause financial distress? Evidence from lottery winners and neighboring bankruptcies. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(1):433–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal S , Qian W , Zou X (2017) Thy neighbor’s misfortune: Peer effect on consumption. Preprint, submitted November 13, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2780764.Google Scholar
• Agarwal S , Chomsisengphet S , Scholnick B , Zhang M (2019) Salient peers and consumption: Evidence from the warranty claims of neighbors. University of Alberta School of Business Research Working Paper 2019-708, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA , Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):715–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angelucci M , De Giorgi G (2009) Indirect effects of an aid program: How do cash transfers affect ineligibles’ consumption? Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):486–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagwell LS , Bernheim BD (1996) Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):349–373.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M , Morse A (2016) Trickle-down consumption. Rev. Econom. Statist. 98(5):863–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M , Luttmer EFP , Mullainathan S (2000) Network effects and welfare cultures. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):1019–1055.Google Scholar
• Bliege Bird R , Smith EA (2005) Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropol. 46(2):221–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bliege Bird R , Smith EA , Bird DW (2001) The hunting handicap: Costly signaling in human foraging strategies. Behav. Ecology Sociobiol. 50(1):9–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borjas GJ (1995) Ethnicity, neighborhoods, and human-capital externalities. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(3):365–390.Google Scholar
• Bricker J , Bucks B (2016) Negative home equity, economic insecurity, and household mobility over the Great Recession. J. Urban Econom. 91(January):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bricker J , Henrique A , Moore K (2017) Updates to the sampling of wealthy families in the survey of consumer finances. Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2017-114, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC. Accessed March 1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2017.114. Google Scholar
• Bricker J , Kennickell A , Moore K , Sabelhaus J (2012) Changes in U.S. family finances from 2007 to 2010: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances. Federal Reserve Bull. 98(2):1–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell JY (2006) Household finance. J. Finance 61(4):1553–1604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell J , Cochrane J (1999) By force of habit: A consumption based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior. J. Political Econom. 107(2):205–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card D , Mas A , Moretti E , Saez E (2012) Inequality at work: the effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2981–3003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll CD (1997) Buffer-stock saving and the life cycle/permanent income hypothesis. Quart. J. Econom. 112(1):1–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Case AC , Katz LF (1991) The company you keep: The effects of family and neighborhood on disadvantaged youths. NBER Working Paper No. w3705, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar
• Charles K , Hurst E , Roussanov N (2009) Conspicuous consumption and race. Quart. J. Econom. 124(2):425–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coibion O , Gorodnichenk Y , Kudlyak M , Mondragon J (2014) Does inequality lead to more household borrowing? New evidence from household data. NBER Working Paper No. 19850, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Cronk L (2005) The application of animal signaling theory to human phenomena: Some thoughts and clarifications. Soc. Sci. Inform. 44(4):603–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cutler D , Glaeser E (1997) Are ghettos good or bad? Quart. J. Econom. 112(3):827–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cutler DM , Glaeser EL , Vigdor JL (1999) The rise and decline of the American ghetto. J. Political Econom. 107(3):455–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Giorgi G , Frederiksen A , Pistaferri L (2020) Consumption network effects. Rev. Econom. Stud. 87(1):130–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demarzo P , Kaniel R , Kremer I (2004) Diversification as a public good: Community effects in portfolio choice. J. Finance 59(4):1677–1715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Domowitz I , Sartain RL (1997) Determinants of the consumer bankruptcy division. J. Finance 54(1):403–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duca J , Rosenthal S (1991) An econometric analysis of borrowing constraints and household debt. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Research Paper 9111, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Dallas.Google Scholar
• Duesenberry JS (1949) Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Dupor B , Liu W-F (2003) Jealousy and equilibrium overconsumption. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(1):423–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engerman SL , Sokoloff KL (2002) Factor endowments, inequality, and paths of development among new world economics. NBER Report No. w9259, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Frank RH (1984) Are workers paid their marginal products? Amer. Econom. Rev. 74:549–71.Google Scholar
• Frank RH (1985) The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(1):101–116.Google Scholar
• Frank RH (1989) Frames of reference and the quality of life. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(2):80–85.Google Scholar
• Galor O , Moav O , Vollrath D (2009) Inequality in landownership, the emergence of human-capital promoting institutions, and the great divergence. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):143–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Georgarakos D , Haliassos M , Pasini G (2014) Household debt and social interactions. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(5):1404–1433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glazer A , Konrad KA (1996) A signaling explanation for charity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(4):1019–1028.Google Scholar
• Grinblatt M , Keloharju M (2001) How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades. J. Finance 56(3):1053–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinblatt M , Keloharju M , Ikaheimo S (2008) Social influence and consumption: Evidence from the automobile purchases of neighbors. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90(4):735–753.Google Scholar
• Han YJ , Nunes JC , Drèze X (2010) Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. J. Marketing 74(4):15–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heffetz O (2011) A test of conspicuous consumption: Visibility and income elasticities. Rev. Econom. Statist. 93(4):1101–1117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H , Kubik JD , Stein JC (2004) Social interaction and stock market participation. J. Finance 59(1):137–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jappelli T (1990) Who is credit-constrained in the U.S. economy? Quart. J. Econom. 105(420):219–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johansson-Stenman O , Martinsson P (2006) Honestly, why are you driving a BMW? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 60(2):129–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennickell A (2017) Modeling wealth with multiple observations of income: Redesign of the sample for the 2001 Survey of Consumer Finances. Statist. J. IAOS 33(1):51–58.Google Scholar
• Kennickell A , McManus D (1993) Sampling for household financial characteristics using frame information on past income. Working paper, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B , Rabin M (2007) Reference-dependent risk attitudes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4):1047–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krimmel J , Moore KB , Sabelhaus J , Smith P (2013) The current state of U.S. household balance sheets. Federal Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev. 95(5):337–359.Google Scholar
• Kuhn P , Kooreman P , Soetevent A , Kapteyn A (2011) The effects of lottery prizes on winners and their neighbors: Evidence from the Dutch postcode lottery. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):2226–2247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuminoff NV , Smith VK , Timmins C (2013) The new economics of equilibrium sorting and policy evaluation using housing markets. J. Econom. Literature 51(4):1007–1062.Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G , O’Donoghue T , Rabin M (2003) Projection bias in predicting future utility. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1209–1248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luttmer EFP (2005) Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quart. J. Econom. 120(3):963–1002.Google Scholar
• McShane C (1995) Down the Asphalt Path: The Automobile and the American City (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Mian A , Sufi A (2011) House prices, home equity-based borrowing, and the US household leverage crisis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):2132–2156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piketty T (2014) Capital in the Twenty First Century (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puri M , Robinson D (2007) Optimism and economic choice. J. Financial Econom. 86(1):71–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajan RG (2010) Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Rajan RG , Ramcharan R (2011) Land and credit: A study of the political economy of banking in the United States in the early 20th century. J. Finance 66(6):1895–1931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajan R, Ramcharan R (2016) Constituencies and legislation: The fight over the McFadden Act of 1927. Management Sci . 62(7):1843–1859.Google Scholar
• Ramcharan R (2010) Inequality and redistribution: Evidence from U.S. counties and states, 1890–1930. Rev. Econom. Stat. 92(4):729–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhode PW , Strumpf KS (2003) Assessing the importance of Tiebout sorting: Local homogeneity from 1850 to 1990. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(5):1648–1677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roussanov N (2010) Diversification and its discontents: Idiosyncratic and entrepreneurial risk in the quest for social status. J. Finance 65(5):1755–1788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saiz A (2010) The geographic determinants of housing supply. Quart. J. Econom. 125(3):1253–1296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundie JM , Kenrick DT , Griskevicius V , Tybur JM , Vohs KD , Beal DJ (2011) Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 100(4):664–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tourangeau R , Johnson R , Qian J , Shin H-C , Frenkel M (1993) Selection of NORC’s 1990 National Sample. Working paper, National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Veblen T (1899) The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions (B. W. Huebsch, New York).Google Scholar