Price-Fixing Cartels and Firm Innovation

References

• Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):701–728.Google Scholar
• Alford R (2018) The Role of Antitrust in Promoting Innovation. U.S. Department of Justice. Accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/file/1038596/download.Google Scholar
• Arora A (1997) Patents, licensing, and market structure in the chemical industry. Res. Policy 26(4–5):391–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Ceccagnoli M (2006) Patent protection, complementary assets, and firms’ incentives for technology licensing. Management Sci. 52(2):293–308.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Sheer L (2021) Knowledge spillovers and corporate investment in scientific research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):871–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Kosenko K, Suh J, Yafeh Y (2024) The rise of scientific research in corporate America. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print December 17, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.18053.Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. Nelson, RR, ed. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 609–626. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH, Dorn D, Hanson GH, Pisano G, Shu P (2020) Foreign competition and domestic innovation: Evidence from US patents. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 2(3):357–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker AC, Larcker DF, Wang CC (2022) How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? J. Financial Econom. 144(2):370–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellemare MF, Wichman CJ (2020) Elasticities and the inverse hyperbolic sine transformation. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 82(1):50–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernheim BD (2008) Expert report of B. Douglas Bernheim. Re: Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1738, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Schankerman M, Van Reenen J (2013) Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica 81(4):1347–1393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boone J (2001) Intensity of competition and the incentive to innovate. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 19(5):705–726.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bracha A, Fershtman C (2013) Competitive incentives: Working harder or working smarter? Management Sci. 59(4):771–781.Link, Google Scholar
• Burbidge JB, Magee L, Robb AL (1988) Alternative transformations to handle extreme values of the dependent variable. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 83(401):123–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levin RC (1989) Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. Schmalansee R, Willing RD, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organ, vol. 2 (Elsevier, New York), 1059–1107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connor JM, Lande RH (2006) The size of cartel overcharges: Implications for U.S. and EU fining policies. Antitrust Bull. 51(4):983–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correa JA, Ornaghi C (2014) Competition & innovation: Evidence from U.S. patent and productivity data. J. Indust. Econom. 62(2):258–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Roth J (2024) Logs with zeros? Some problems and solutions. Quart. J. Econom. 139(2):891–936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eswaran M (1993) Cross-licensing of competing patents as a facilitating device. Canadian J. Econom. 27(3):689–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gong K, Xu R (2017) Does import competition induce R&D reallocation? Evidence from the U.S. IMF Working Paper No. 2017/253, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh C, Rogers M (2006) The value of innovation: The interaction of competition, R&D and IP. Res. Policy 35(4):562–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1992) The search for R&D spillovers. Scand. J. Econom. 94:29–47.Google Scholar
• Gross DP (2020) Creativity under fire: The effects of competition on creative production. Rev. Econom. Statist. 102(3):583–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Ziedonis RH (2001) The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979-1995. RAND J. Econom. 32(1):101–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Hashmi AR (2013) Competition and innovation: The inverted-U relationship revisited. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(5):1653–1668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Igami M, Sugaya T (2022) Measuring the incentive to collude: The vitamin cartels, 1990-1999. Rev. Econom. Stud. 89(3):1460–1494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Im HJ, Park YJ, Shon J (2015) Product market competition and the value of innovation: Evidence from US patent data. Econom. Lett. 137:78–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang H, Lee W (2022) How innovating firms manage knowledge leakage: A natural experiment on the threat of worker departure. Strategic Management J. 43(10):1961–1982.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein JI (2006) Antitrust Enforcement and the Consumer. U.S. Department of Justice. Accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/atr/file/800691/download.Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Krieger JL, Li D, Papanikolaou D (2022) Missing novelty in drug development. Rev. Financial Stud. 35(2):636–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lampe R, Moser P (2013) Patent pools and innovation in substitute technologies—Evidence from the 19th-century sewing machine industry. RAND J. Econom. 44(4):757–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lampe R, Moser P (2016) Patent pools, competition, and innovation—Evidence from 20 US industries under the new deal. J. Law. Econom. Organ. 32(1):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lefouili Y (2015) Does competition spur innovation? The case of yardstick competition. Econom. Lett. 137:135–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (1995) Patenting in the shadow of competitors. J. Law Econom. 38(2):463–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levenstein MC, Suslow VY (2006) What determines cartel success? J. Econom. Literature 44(1):43–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levenstein MC, Suslow VY (2011) Breaking up is hard to do: Determinants of cartel duration. J. Law Econom. 54(2):455–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levenstein MC, Suslow VY (2016) Price fixing hits home: An empirical study of US price-fixing conspiracies. Rev. Indust. Organ. 48(4):361–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin RC, Cohen WM, Mowery D (1985) R&D appropriability, opportunity, and market structure: New evidence on some Schumpeterian hypotheses. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(2):20–24.Google Scholar
• Loury GC (1979) Market structure and innovation. Quart. J. Econom. 93(3):395–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macher J, Miller NH, Osborne M (2021) Finding Mr. Schumpeter: Technology adoption in the cement industry. RAND J. Econom. 52(1):78–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mezzanotti F, Simcoe T (2023) Research and/or development? Financial frictions and innovation investment. NBER Working Paper No. 31521, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Pate RH (2003) Anti-cartel enforcement: The core antitrust mission. U.S. Department of Justice. Accessed March 17, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/atr/file/518801/download.Google Scholar
• Priest G (1977) Cartels and patent license arrangements. J. Law Econom. 20(2):309–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schor A (2004) Heterogeneous productivity response to tariff reduction. Evidence from Brazilian manufacturing firms. J. Development Econom. 75(2):373–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credits, Interest, and the Business Cycle (Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (George Allen & Unwin, London).Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):172–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner SF, Mitchell W, Bettis RA (2010) Responding to rivals and complements: How market concentration shapes generational product innovation strategy. Organ. Sci. 21(4):854–872.Link, Google Scholar
• Vestager M (2016) Competition: The mother of invention. European Competition and Consumer Day, 18 Apr. 2016. Amsterdam, Netherlands. Speech by European Competition Commissioner. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/speech_16_5539.Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1965) Innovation and market structure. J. Political Econom. 73(1):67–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu M (2015) Processing trade, tariff reductions and firm productivity: Evidence from Chinese firms. Econom. J. 125(585):943–988.Google Scholar