Round Number Preferences and Left-Digit Bias: Evidence from Credit Card Repayments

References

• Adams P, Guttman-Kenney B, Hayes L, Hunt S, Laibson D, Stewart N (2025) The semblance of success in nudging consumers to pay down credit card debt. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, Chomsisengphet S, Mahoney N, Stroebel J (2015) Regulating consumer financial products: Evidence from credit cards. Quart. J. Econom. 130:111–164. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albers W, Albers G (1983) On the prominence structure of the decimal system. Advances in Psychology, vol. 16 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 271–287.Google Scholar
• Allen EJ, Dechow PM, Pope DG, Wu G (2016) Reference-dependent preferences: Evidence from marathon runners. Management Sci. 63:1657–1672.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyle BS, Nadauld TD, Palmer CJ (2020) Monthly payment targeting and the demand for maturity. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(11):5416–5462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya U, Holden CW, Jacobsen S (2012) Penny wise, dollar foolish: Buy–sell imbalances on and around round numbers. Management Sci. 58:413–431.Link, Google Scholar
• CFPB (2023) Consumer credit card market. Report, CFPB, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Converse BA, Dennis PJ (2018) The role of “prominent numbers” in open numerical judgment: Strained decision makers choose from a limited set of accessible numbers. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 147:94–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• d’Astous P, Shore SH (2017) Liquidity constraints and credit card delinquency: Evidence from raising minimum payments. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (Oxford) 52:1705–1730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Englmaier F, Roider A, Schlereth L, Sebastian S (2023) Round-number effects in real estate prices: Evidence from Germany. Discussion Paper No. 446, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Collaborative Research Center Transregio 190 - Rationality and Competition, München und Berlin.Google Scholar
• Financial Conduct Authority (2015) Credit card market study. Report, FCA, London.Google Scholar
• Gathergood J, Mahoney N, Stewart N, Weber J (2019) How do individuals repay their debt? The balance-matching heuristic. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109:844–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guttman-Kenney B, Leary J, Stewart N (2018) Weighing anchor on credit card debt. Report, FCA, London.Google Scholar
• Hirshman SD, Sussman AB (2022) Minimum payments alter debt repayment strategies across multiple cards. J. Marketing 86:48–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jambulapati V (2017) Financial decisions of households. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Kandel S, Sarig O, Wohl A (2001) Do investors prefer round stock prices? Evidence from Israeli IPO auctions. J. Banking Finance 25:1543–1551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keys BJ, Wang J (2019) Minimum payments and debt paydown in consumer credit cards. J. Financial Econom. 131:528–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Pope DG, Sydnor JR (2012) Heuristic thinking and limited attention in the car market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102:2206–2236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebman JB, Zeckhauser RJ (2004) Schmeduling. NBER Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• List JA, Muir I, Pope D, Sun G (2023) Left-digit bias at Lyft. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90:3186–3237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manning KC, Sprott DE (2009) Price endings, left-digit effects, and choice. J. Consumer Res. 36:328–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Medina PC, Negrin JL (2022) The hidden role of contract terms: The case of credit card minimum payments in Mexico. Management Sci. 68:3856–3877.Link, Google Scholar
• Navarro-Martinez D, Salisbury LC, Lemon KN, Stewart N, Matthews WJ, Harris AJL (2011) Minimum required payment and supplemental information disclosure effects on consumer debt repayment decisions. J. Marketing Res. 48:S60–S77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poltrock SE, Schwartz DR (1984) Comparative judgments of multidigit numbers. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn, Memory Cognition 10:32–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pope D, Simonsohn U (2011) Round numbers as goals: Evidence from baseball, SAT takers, and the lab. Psych. Sci. 22:71–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pope DG, Pope JC, Sydnor JR (2015) Focal points and bargaining in housing markets. Games Econom. Behav. 93:89–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe C, Burke J, Heck P, Bolton M, Saunders E (2023) Consumer savings app strategies and savings outcomes. Report, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Rees-Jones A, Taubinsky D (2020) Measuring “schmeduling.” Rev. Econom. Stud. 87:2399–2438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roger T, Roger P, Schatt A (2018) Behavioral bias in number processing: Evidence from analysts’ expectations. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 149:315–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sakaguchi H, Stewart N, Gathergood J, Adams P, Guttman-Kenney B, Hayes L, Hunt S (2022) Default effects of credit card minimum payments. J. Marketing Res. 59:775–796.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sonnemans J (2006) Price clustering and natural resistance points in the Dutch stock market: A natural experiment. Eur. Econom. Rev. 50:1937–1950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stango V, Zinman J (2009) Exponential growth bias and household finance. J. Finance 64:2807–2849.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart N (2009) The cost of anchoring on credit-card minimum repayments. Psych. Sci. 20:39–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strulov-Shlain A (2023) More than a penny’s worth: Left-digit bias and firm pricing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90:2612–2645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas M, Morwitz V (2005) Penny wise and pound foolish: The left-digit effect in price cognition. J. Consumer Res. 32:54–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whynes DK, Philips Z, Frew E (2005) Think of a number… any number? Health Econom. 14:1191–1195.Crossref, Google Scholar