Field Experimental Evidence on the Effect of Pricing on Residential Electricity Conservation

References

• Alizamir S, Blair M, Wang S (2023) Optimal thermostat control for rationally inattentive consumers. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Anderson L, Hansen LG, Jensen CL, Wolak F (2019) Can incentives to increase electricity use reduce the cost of integrating renewables. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
• Andor MA, Gerster A, Peters J (2022) Information campaigns for residential energy conservation. Eur. Econom. Rev. 144:104094.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettman J, Luce F, Payne J (1998) Constructive consumer choice processes. J. Consumer Res. 25(3):187–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollinger B, Hartmann W (2020) Information vs. automation and implications for dynamic pricing. Management Sci. 66(1):290–314.Link, Google Scholar
• Bollinger B, Leslie P, Sorensen A (2011) Calorie posting in chain restaurants. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 3(1):91–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y-C, Shang R-A, Kao C-Y (2009) The effects of information overload on consumers’ subjective state toward buying decision in the Internet shopping environment. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 8(1):48–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• EPA (2013) Estimating the Benefit per Ton of Reducing Directly-Emitted PM2.5, PM2.5 Precursors, and Ozone Precursors from 17 Sectors (US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Fowlie M, Wolfram C, Spurlock CA, Todd A, Baylis P, Cappers P (2021) Default effects and follow-on behavior: Evidence from an electricity pricing program. Rev. Econom. Stud. 88(6):2886–2934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gillian J (2018) Dynamic pricing, attention, and automation: Evidence from a field experiment in electricity consumption. Working paper, Energy Institute at Haas, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
• Grubb MD, Osborne M (2015) Cellular service demand: Biased beliefs, learning, and bill shock. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(1):234–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harding M, Lamarche C (2016) Empowering consumers through data and smart technology: Experimental evidence on the consequences of time-of-use electricity pricing policies. J. Policy Anal. Management 35(4):906–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland SP, Mansur ET, Muller NZ, Yates AJ (2016) Are there environmental benefits from driving electric vehicles? The importance of local factors. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(12):3700–3729.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ito K (2014) Do consumers respond to marginal or average price? Evidence from nonlinear electricity pricing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(2):537–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ito K, Ida T, Tanaka M (2018) Moral suasion and economic incentives: Field experimental evidence from energy demand. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 10(1):240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jessoe K, Rapson D (2014) Knowledge is (less) power: Experimental evidence from residential energy use. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1417–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn M, Wolak F (2013) Using information to improve the effectiveness of nonlinear pricing: Evidence from a field experiment. NBER Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Prest BC (2020) Peaking interest: How awareness drives the effectiveness of time-of-use electricity pricing. J. Assoc. Environmental Resources Econom. 7(1):103–143.Google Scholar
• Rennert K, Errickson F, Prest BC, Rennels L, Newell RG, Pizer W, Kingdon C, et al. (2022) Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of co2. Nature 610(7933):687–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Royal A, Rustamov G (2018) Do small pecuniary incentives motivate residential peak energy reductions? Experimental evidence. Appl. Econom. 50(57):6193–6202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C, Zhang J (2010) Growing two-sided networks by advertising the user base: A field experiment. Marketing Sci. 29(5):805–814.Link, Google Scholar
• Tucker C, Zhang J (2011) How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Sci. 57(5):828–842.Link, Google Scholar
• Wolak F (2006) Residential customer response to real-time pricing: The anaheim critical-peak pricing experiment. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
• Zarnikau J, Zhu S, Russell R, Holloway M, Dittmer M (2015) How will tomorrow’s residential consumers respond to price signals? Insights from a Texas pricing experiment. Electronic J. 28(7):57–71.Crossref, Google Scholar