Startup Accelerators, Information Asymmetry, and Corporate Venture Capital Investments

References

• Abadie A (2005) Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abadie A, Athey S, Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2023) When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? Quart. J. Econom. 138(1):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Dorn D, Hanson GH, Price B (2014) Return of the Solow paradox? IT, productivity, and employment in US manufacturing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(5):394–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal R, Kryscynski D, Singh H (2015) Evaluating venture technical competence in venture capitalist investment decisions. Management Sci. 61(11):2685–2706.Link, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal R, Gopal R, Gupta A, Singh H (2012) Putting money where the mouths are: The relation between venture financing and electronic word-of-mouth. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3-part-2):976–992.Link, Google Scholar
• Alvarez‐Garrido E, Dushnitsky G (2016) Are entrepreneurial venture’s innovation rates sensitive to investor complementary assets? Comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs. Strategic Management J. 37(5):819–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amit R, Brander J, Zott C (1998) Why do venture capital firms exist? Theory and Canadian evidence. J. Bus. Venturing 13(6):441–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amit R, Glosten L, Muller E (1990) Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments, and risk sharing. Management Sci. 36(10):1233–1246.Link, Google Scholar
• Andal-Ancion A, Cartwright PA, Yip GS (2003) The digital transformation of traditional business. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 44(4):34–41.Google Scholar
• Arts S, Fleming L (2018) Paradise of novelty—Or loss of human capital? Exploring new fields and inventive output. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1074–1092.Link, Google Scholar
• Austin PC, Small DS (2014) The use of bootstrapping when using propensity‐score matching without replacement: A simulation study. Statist. Med. 33(24):4306–4319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagno RB, Salerno MS, de Souza Junior WC, O’Connor GC (2020) Corporate engagements with startups: Antecedents, models, and open questions for innovation management. Product Management Development 18(1):39–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benson D, Ziedonis RH (2009) Corporate venture capital as a window on new technologies: Implications for the performance of corporate investors when acquiring startups. Organ. Sci. 20(2):329–351.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhojraj S, Lee CMC, Oler DK (2003) What’s my line? A comparison of industry classification schemes for capital market research. J. Accounting Res. 41(5):745–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2012) Americans do IT better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):167–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borusyak K, Jaravel X, Spiess J (2024) Revisiting event-study designs: Robust and efficient estimation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 91(6):3253–3285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2003) Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(4):793–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butts K, Gardner J (2022) {did2s}: Two-stage difference-in-differences. Preprint, submitted May 20, http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.05913.Google Scholar
• Callaway B, Sant’Anna PHC (2021) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econometrics 225(2):200–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2008) Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90(3):414–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli M, Higgins MJ, Kang HD (2018) Corporate venture capital as a real option in the markets for technology. Strategic Management J. 39(13):3355–3381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chabé-Ferret S (2017) Should we combine difference in differences with conditioning on pre-treatment outcomes? TSE Working Paper No. 17-824, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
• Charoontham K, Amornpetchkul T (2023) Reputational impact on startup accelerator’s information disclosure and performance. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 32(2):250–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chemmanur TJ, Loutskina E, Tian X (2014) Corporate venture capital, value creation, and innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(8):2434–2473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough HW (2002) Making sense of corporate venture capital. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(3):90–99.Google Scholar
• Cohen S (2013) What do accelerators do? Insights from incubators and angels. Innovations Tech. Governance Globalization 8(3–4):19–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Hochberg Y (2014) Accelerating startups: The seed accelerator phenomenon. Preprint, submitted March 31, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2418000.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen SL, Bingham CB, Hallen BL (2019) The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):810–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crișan EL, Salanță II, Beleiu IN, Bordean ON, Bunduchi R (2021) A systematic literature review on accelerators. J. Tech. Transfer 46(1):62–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Clercq D, Fried VH, Lehtonen O, Sapienza HJ (2006) An entrepreneur’s guide to the venture capital galaxy. Acad. Management Perspect. 20(3):90–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dehejia RH, Wahba S (2002) Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 84(1):151–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2005a) When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strategic Management J. 26(10):947–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2005b) When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Res. Policy 34(5):615–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2006) When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value? J. Bus. Venturing 21(6):753–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Shapira Z (2010) Entrepreneurial finance meets organizational reality: Comparing investment practices and performance of corporate and independent venture capitalists. Strategic Management J. 31(9):990–1017.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyreng SD, Hanlon M, Maydew EL (2010) The effects of executives on corporate tax avoidance. Accounting Rev. 85(4):1163–1189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ernst H, Witt P, Brachtendorf G (2005) Corporate venture capital as a strategy for external innovation: An exploratory empirical study. R&D Management 35(3):233–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehder D, Hochberg Y (2014) Accelerators and the regional supply of venture capital investment. Preprint, submitted November 5, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2518668.Google Scholar
• Friedlmaier M, Tumasjan A, Welpe IM (2018) Disrupting industries with blockchain: The industry, venture capital funding, and regional distribution of blockchain ventures. Proc. 51st Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. 2018 HICSS-51 (Association for Information Systems (AIS), Atlanta), 3517–3526.Google Scholar
• Fritsch M, Schilder D (2008) Does venture capital investment really require spatial proximity? An empirical investigation. Environ. Plan. A 40(9):2114–2131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao H, Zhang W (2017) Employment nondiscrimination acts and corporate innovation. Management Sci. 63(9):2982–2999.Link, Google Scholar
• Gardner J (2022) Two-stage differences in differences. Preprint, submitted July 13, https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.05943.Google Scholar
• Gompers P, Lerner J (2000) The determinants of corporate venture capital success: Organizational structure, incentives, and complementarities. Morck RK, ed. Concentrated Corporate Ownership (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 17–54.Google Scholar
• Gompers P, Lerner J (2001) The venture capital revolution. J. Econom. Perspect. 15(2):145–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Uribe J, Leatherbee M (2018) The effects of business accelerators on venture performance: Evidence from start-up Chile. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(4):1566–1603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haleblian J, Finkelstein S (1999) The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral learning perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):29–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallen B, Bingham C, Cohen S (2019) Do accelerators work? If so, how? Preprint, submitted April 5, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2719810.Google Scholar
• Hanelt A, Bohnsack R, Marz D, Antunes Marante C (2021) A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. J. Management Stud. 58(5):1159–1197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Healy PM, Palepu KG (2001) Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. J. Accounting Econom. 31(1–3):405–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinneburg A, Keim DA (1999) Optimal grid-clustering: Towards breaking the curse of dimensionality in high-dimensional clustering. Proc. 25th Internat. Conf. Very Large Data Bases VLDB ‘99 (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco), 506–517.Google Scholar
• Hoberg G, Phillips G (2016) Text-based network industries and endogenous product differentiation. J. Political Econom. 124(5):1423–1465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hochberg YV (2016) Accelerating entrepreneurs and ecosystems: The seed accelerator model. Innovation Policy Econom. 16(1):25–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horneber C (2022) Value creation through start-up integration. Baumann S, ed. Handbook on Digital Business Ecosystems (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 126–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoynes H, Schanzenbach DW, Almond D (2016) Long-run impacts of childhood access to the safety net. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(4):903–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang P, Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Wu DJ (2022) IT knowledge spillovers, absorptive capacity, and productivity: Evidence from enterprise software. Inform. Systems Res. 33(3):908–934.Link, Google Scholar
• Im KS, Grover V, Teng JT (2013) Do large firms become smaller by using information technology? Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):470–491.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson E, Hemmatian I, Lanahan L, Joshi AM (2022) A framework and databases for measuring entrepreneurial ecosystems. Res. Policy 51(2):104398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B, Rousseau PL (2005) General purpose technologies. Aghion P, Durlauf SN, eds. Handbook of Economic Growth (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1181–1224.Google Scholar
• Jung J, Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Umyarov A (2019) Love unshackled: Identifying the effect of mobile app adoption in online dating. MIS Quart. 43:47–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keil T, Autio E, George G (2008a) Corporate venture capital, disembodied experimentation and capability development. J. Management Stud. 45(8):1475–1505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keil T, Maula M, Schildt H, Zahra SA (2008b) The effect of governance modes and relatedness of external business development activities on innovative performance. Strategic Management J. 29(8):895–907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kile CO, Phillips ME (2009) Using industry classification codes to sample high-technology firms: Analysis and recommendations. J. Accounting Auditing Finance 24(1):35–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K, Gopal A, Hoberg G (2016) Does product market competition drive CVC investment? Evidence from the US IT industry. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):259–281.Link, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (2013) Corporate venturing. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(101):86–94.Google Scholar
• Liao H, Wang B, Li B, Weyman-Jones T (2016) ICT as a general-purpose technology: The productivity of ICT in the United States revisited. Inform. Econom. Policy 36:10–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacMillan IC, Roberts EB, Livada V, Wang AY (2008) Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) Seeking Innovation and Strategic Growth: Recent Patterns in CVC Mission, Structure, and Investment (National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Maula MV (2007) Corporate venture capital as a strategic tool for corporations. Hans L, ed. Handbook of Research on Venture Capital (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 371–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayya R, Li R (2025) Growing platforms by adding complementors without a contract. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print February 20, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.0237.Google Scholar
• Mayya R, Viswanathan S (2024) Delaying informed consent: An empirical investigation of mobile apps’ upgrade decisions. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print December 2, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.00334.Link, Google Scholar
• Meyer BD (1995) Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 13(2):151–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado GS, Dean J (2013) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Burges CJ, Bottou L, Welling M, Ghahramani Z, Weinberger KQ, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY), 1–9.Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS (1998) Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Res. Policy 27(5):507–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• OECD (2017) Venture capital investments by sector. Secretary-General of the OECD, ed. Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2017 (OECD Publishing, Paris), 130–131.Google Scholar
• Olden A, Møen J (2022) The triple difference estimator. Econom. J. 25(3):531–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Huang P, Gopal A (2019) Storm clouds on the horizon? New entry threats and R&D investments in the U.S. IT industry. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):540–562.Link, Google Scholar
• Park HD, Steensma HK (2012) When does corporate venture capital add value for new ventures? Strategic Management J. 33(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pauwels C, Clarysse B, Wright M, Van Hove J (2016) Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation 50:13–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray G, Wu D, Konana P (2009) Competitive environment and the relationship between IT and vertical integration. Inform. Systems Res. 20(4):585–603.Link, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Schilling MA, Bellavitis C (2019) Platform strategy: Managing ecosystem value through selective promotion of complements. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1232–1251.Link, Google Scholar
• Rossi M, Festa G, Devalle A, Mueller J (2020) When corporations get disruptive, the disruptive get corporate: Financing disruptive technologies through corporate venture capital. J. Bus. Res. 118:378–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth J, Sant’Anna PHC (2023) Efficient estimation for staggered rollout designs. J. Political Econom. Microeconom. 1(4):669–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sapienza HJ, Parhankangas A, Autio E (2004) Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth. J. Bus. Venturing19(6):809–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schildt H, Keil T, Maula M (2012) The temporal effects of relative and firm‐level absorptive capacity on interorganizational learning. Strategic Management J. 33(10):1154–1173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schildt HA, Maula MV, Keil T (2005) Explorative and exploitative learning from external corporate ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 29(4):493–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Servaes H, Tamayo A (2013) The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Sci. 59(5):1045–1061.Link, Google Scholar
• Shi Z, Lee GM, Whinston AB (2016) Toward a better measure of business proximity: Topic modeling for industry intelligence. MIS Quart. 40(4):1035–1056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel R, Siegel E, MacMillan IC (1988) Corporate venture capitalists: Autonomy, obstacles, and performance. J. Bus. Venturing 3(3):233–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh H, Aggarwal R, Cojuharenco I (2015) Strike a happy medium: The effect of IT knowledge on venture capitalists’ overconfidence in IT investments. MIS Quart. 39(4):887–908.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Todd PE (2005) Does matching overcome LaLonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators? J. Econometrics 125(1–2):305–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Stuart TE (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1546–1588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Souitaris V, Zerbinati S (2014) How do corporate venture capitalists do deals? An exploration of corporate investment practices. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 8(4):321–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramanian H, Mitra S, Ransbotham S (2021) Capturing value in platform business models that rely on user-generated content. Organ. Sci. 32(3):804–823.Link, Google Scholar
• Sun L, Abraham S (2021) Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. J. Econometrics 225(2):175–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tong TW, Li Y (2011) Real options and investment mode: Evidence from corporate venture capital and acquisition. Organ. Sci. 22(3):659–674.Link, Google Scholar
• van Ark B, O’Mahoney M, Timmer MP (2008) The productivity gap between Europe and the United States: Trends and causes. J. Econom. Perspect. 22(1):25–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venâncio A, Jorge J (2022) The role of accelerator programmes on the capital structure of start-ups. Small Bus. Econom. 59(3):1143–1167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verhoef PC, Broekhuizen T, Bart Y, Bhattacharya A, Dong JQ, Fabian N, Haenlein M (2021) Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. J. Bus. Res. 122:889–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vial G (2019) Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 28(2):118–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westerman G, Bonnet D, McAfee A (2014) The nine elements of digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 55(3):1–6.Google Scholar
• Winston Smith S, Hannigan TJ, Gasiorowski LL (2013) Accelerators and crowd-funding: Complementarity, competition, or convergence in the earliest stages of financing new ventures? Preprint, submitted July 27, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2298875.Google Scholar
• Wright M, Robbie K (1996) Venture capitalists, unquoted equity investment appraisal and the role of accounting information. Accounting Bus. Res. 26(2):153–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Narayanan VK, De Carolis DM (2014) The relationship between portfolio diversification and firm value: The evidence from corporate venture capital activity. Strategic Management J. 35(13):1993–2011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu S (2020) How do accelerators impact the performance of high-technology ventures? Management Sci. 66(2):530–552.Link, Google Scholar
• Zellner A (1963) Estimators for seemingly unrelated regression equations: Some exact finite sample results. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 58(304):977–992.Crossref, Google Scholar