A Bayesian Level-k Model in n-Person Games

References

• Alaoui L, Penta A (2016) Endogenous depth of reasoning. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(4):1297–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Binmore K, Shaked A, Sutton J (1985) Testing noncooperative bargaining theory: A preliminary study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(5):1178–1180.Google Scholar
• Bosch-Domènech A, Vriend NJ (2003) Imitation of successful behaviour in the markets. Econom. J. 113(487):495–524.Google Scholar
• Bosch-Domènech A, Montalvo JG, Nagel R, Satorra A (2002) One, two, (three), infinity, … : Newspaper and lab beauty-contest experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1687–1701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brocas I, Carrillo JD, Wang SW, Camerer CF (2014) Imperfect choice or imperfect attention? Understanding strategic thinking in private information games. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(3):944–970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown GW (1951) Iterative solution of games by fictitious play. Koopmans TC, ed. Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Cowles Commission Monographs, vol. 13 (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 374–376.Google Scholar
• Brown A, Camerer CF, Lovallo D (2012) To review or not to review? Limited strategic thinking at the movie box office. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 4(2):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Ho T-H (1999) Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica 67(4):837–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Ho T-H, Chong J-K (2004) A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quart. J. Econom. 119(3):861–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capra CM, Goeree JK, Gomez R, Holt CA (1999) Anomalous behavior in a traveler’s dilemma? Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(3):678–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa-Gomes M, Crawford V (2006) Cognition and behavior in two-person guessing games: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1737–1768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa-Gomes M, Weizsäcker G (2008) Stated beliefs and play in normal-form games. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(3):729–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa-Gomes M, Crawford V, Broseta B (2001) Cognition and behavior in normal-form games: An experimental study. Econometrica 69(5):1193–1235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa-Gomes M, Crawford V, Iriberri N (2009) Comparing models of strategic thinking in Van Huyck, Battalio, and Beil’s coordination games. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 7(2–3):377–387.Google Scholar
• Crawford VP (2003) Lying for strategic advantage: Rational and boundedly rational misrepresentation of intentions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(1):133–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Iriberri N (2007a) Fatal attraction: Salience, naivete, and sophistication in experimental hide-and-seek games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1731–1750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Iriberri N (2007b) Level-k auctions: Can a non-equilibrium model of strategic thinking explain the winner’s curse and overbidding in private-value auctions? Econometrica 75(6):1721–1770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Costa-Gomes MA, Iriberri N (2013) Structural models of nonequilibrium strategic thinking: Theory, evidence, and applications. J. Econom. Literature 51(1):5–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Kugler T, Neeman Z, Pauzner A (2009) Behaviorally optimal auction design: An example and some observations. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 7(2–3):377–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G, Fudenberg D (2000) Learning purified mixed equilibria. J. Econom. Theory 90(1):84–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erev I, Roth AE (1998) Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(4):848–881.Google Scholar
• Fouraker L, Siegel S (1963) Bargaining Behavior (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Kreps D (1993) Learning mixed equilibria. Games Econom. Behav. 5(3):320–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Levine D (1993) Steady state learning and Nash equilibrium. Econometrica 61(3):547–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Levine D (1998) Theory of Learning in Games (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Gill D, Prowse VL (2016) Cognitive ability, character skills, and learning to play equilibrium: A level-k analysis. J. Political Econom. 124(6):1619–1676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Xiao M (2011) Who thinks about the competition? Managerial ability and strategic entry in US local telephone markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(7):3130–3161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Yang B (2009) Are all managers created equal? J. Marketing Res. 46(5):612–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goeree JK, Holt CA (2001) Ten little treasures of game theory and ten intuitive contradictions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(5):1402–1422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goeree JK, Holt CA, Palfrey TR (2002) Quantal response equilibrium and overbidding in private-value auctions. J. Econom. Theory 104(1):247–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC, Selten R (1988) A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Su X (2013) A dynamic level-k model in sequential games. Management Sci. 59(2):452–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Camerer CF, Chong J-K (2007) Self-tuning experience-weighted attraction learning in games. J. Econom. Theory 133(1):177–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Camerer C, Weigelt K (1998) Iterated dominance and iterated best response in experimental “p-beauty contests.” Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(4):947–969.Google Scholar
• Huck S, Normann H-T, Oechssler J (1999) Learning in Cournot oligopoly—An experiment. Econom. J. 109(454):C80–C95.Google Scholar
• McAfee RP, McMillan J (1987) Auctions and bidding. J. Econom. Literature 25(2):699–738.Google Scholar
• McKelvey RD, Palfrey TR (1992) An experimental study of the centipede game. Econometrica 60(4):803–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagel R (1995) Unraveling in guessing games: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(5):1313–1326.Google Scholar
• Ochs J, Roth AE (1989) An experimental study of sequential bargaining. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(3):355–384.Google Scholar
• Östling R, Wang JT-Y, Chou E, Camerer C (2011) Testing game theory in the field: Swedish LUPI lottery games. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3(3):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl DO (1996) Boundedly rational rule learning in a guessing game. Games Econom. Behav. 16(2):303–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl DO (1999) Evidence based rules and learning in symmetric normal-form games. Internat. J. Game Theory 28(1):111–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl DO (2000) Rule learning in symmetric normal-form games: Theory and evidence. Games Econom. Behav. 32(1):105–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl DO (2001) Population rule learning in symmetric normal-form games: Theory and evidence. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 45(1):19–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl DO, Haruvy E (2002) Aspiration-based and reciprocity-based rules in learning dynamics for symmetric normal-form games. J. Math. Psych. 46(5):531–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl D, Wilson P (1994) Experimental evidence on players’ models of other players. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 25(3):309–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl D, Wilson P (1995) On players’ models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence. Games Econom. Behav. 10(1):218–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber RA (2003) “Learning” with no feedback in a competitive guessing game. Games Econom. Behav. 44(1):134–144.Crossref, Google Scholar