What Motivates Innovative Entrepreneurs? Evidence from a Global Field Experiment

References

• Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2):323–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Astebro TB, Hoos F (2016) The effects of a training program to encourage social entrepreneurship. HEC Paris Research Paper SPE-2016-1128, HEC Paris, Paris.Google Scholar
• Bapna S (2017) Complementarity of signals in early-stage equity investment decisions: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 65(2):933–952.Link, Google Scholar
• Bapna S, Ganco M (2020) Gender gaps in equity crowdfunding: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Bernstein S, Korteweg A, Laws K (2017) Attracting early-stage investors: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. J. Finance 72(2):509–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lakhani KR (2016) Innovation experiments: researching technical advance, knowledge production, and the design of supporting institutions. Innovation Policy Econom. 16(1):135–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks AW, Huang L, Kearney SW, Murray FE (2014) Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4427–4431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Lovallo D (1999) Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):306–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassar G (2007) Money, money, money? A longitudinal investigation of entrepreneur career reasons, growth preferences and achieved growth. Entrepreneurship Regional Development 19(1):89–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassar L, Meier S (2018) Nonmonetary incentives and the implications of work as a source of meaning. J. Econom. Perspect. 32(3):215–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catalini C, Guzman J, Stern S (2019) Passive vs. active growth: Evidence from founder choices and venture capital investment. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Chatterji A, Delecourt S, Hasan S, Koning R (2019) When does advice impact startup performance? Strategic Management J. 40(3):331–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dacin MT, Dacin PA, Tracey P (2011) Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organ. Sci. 22:1203–1213.Link, Google Scholar
• Ding WW, Murray F, Stuart TE (2013) From bench to board: Gender differences in university scientists’ participation in corporate scientific advisory boards. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1443–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ewens M, Townsend R (2020) Are early stage investors biased against women? J. Financial Econom. 135(3):653–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Becker A, Dohmen T, Enke B, Huffman D, Sunde U (2018) Global evidence on economic preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 133(4):1645–1692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganguli I, Le Coq C, Huysentruyt M (2018) Do nascent social entrepreneurs respond to rewards? A field experiment on motivations in a grant competition. Working paper, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst.Google Scholar
• Gans J, Scott EL, Stern S (2017) Entrepreneurial strategy. Accessed May 6, 2020, https://www.entrepreneurial-strategy.net.Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Kacperczyk AO (2019) Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 48(7):1666–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Stern S (2020) The state of American entrepreneurship: New estimates of the quantity and quality of entrepreneurship for 32 U.S. States, 1988-2014. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Hamilton B (2000) Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment. J. Political Econom. 108(3):604–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hockerts K (2017) Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 41(1):105–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howell S, Nanda R (2019) Networking frictions in venture capital, and the gender gap in entrepreneurship. Harvard Business School Entrepreneurial Management Working Paper 19-105, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Hurst E, Pugsley BW (2011) What do small businesses do? NBER Working Paper No. 17041, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kanze D, Huang L, Conley MA, Higgins ET (2018) We ask men to win and women not to lose: Closing the gender gap in startup funding. Acad. Management J. 61(2):586–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr SP, Kerr WR, Dalton M (2019) Risk attitudes and personality traits of entrepreneurs and venture team members. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(36):17712–17716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee M, Huang L (2018) Gender bias, social impact framing, and evaluation of entrepreneurial ventures. Organ. Sci. 29(1):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• MIT IIC (2019a) 2019 MIT inclusive innovation challenge rewards entrepreneurs reinventing the future of work. Accessed November 11, 2019, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YSHVDU8jNo.Google Scholar
• MIT IIC (2019b) The MIT IIC 2019 impact report. Accessed November 11, 2019, https://www.mitinclusiveinnovation.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/MIT_IIC_2019_IMPACT_REPORT_Summit_edition_July_10_DIGITAL.pdf.Google Scholar
• Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J. Political Econom. 98(5, Part 2):S71–S102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoar A (2010) The divide between subsistence and transformational entrepreneurship. Innovation Policy Econom. 10(1):57–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (Routledge, Abingdon, UK).Google Scholar