Does the Freedom of Information Act Foil the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Intent to Keep Investigations Confidential?

References

• Blackburne T , Bozanic Z , Johnson B , Roulstone D (2018) The regulatory observer effect: Large-sample evidence from SEC investigations. Working paper, Oregon State University, Corvallis.Google Scholar
• Blackburne T , Kepler J , Quinn P , Taylor D (2019) Undisclosed SEC investigations. Working paper, Oregon State University, Corvallis.Google Scholar
• Bonsall S , Holzman E , Miller B (2019) Busy regulators: The impact of SEC regional office case backlog on the likelihood of an SEC investigation. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, State College.Google Scholar
• Carhart MM (1997) On persistence in mutual fund performance. J. Finance 52(1):57–82.Google Scholar
• Daniel K , Grinblatt M , Titman S , Wermers R (1997) Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic‐based benchmarks. J. Finance 52(3):1035–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drake MS , Guest NM , Twedt BJ (2014) The media and mispricing: The role of the business press in the pricing of accounting information. Accounting Rev. 89(5):1673–1701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dechow PM , Ge W , Larson CR , Sloan RG (2011) Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Res. 28(1):17–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF , French KR (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. 33(1):3–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gargano A , Rossi AG , Wermers R (2017) The freedom of information act and the race toward information acquisition. Rev. Financial Stud. 30(6):2179–2228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ge W , Matsumoto D , Zhang JL (2011) Do CFOs have style? An empirical investigation of the effect of individual CFOs on accounting practices. Contemporary Accounting Res. 28(4):1141–1179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W (2004) The behavior of the maximum likelihood estimator of limited dependent variable models in the presence of fixed effects. Econom. J. 7(1):98–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harnisch K , Pashkoff P , Umayam M (2010) Controversial Dodd-Frank FOIA provision repealed, revised. SecMail. Accessed May 27, 2019, https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=cc5a97e3-4a66-432f-add7-69a5c45d7e5 .Google Scholar
• Holzman E , Marshall NT , Schmidt B (2019) Who’s on the hot seat for an SEC Investigation and how do they respond? Working paper, The Ohio State Univerity, Columbus.Google Scholar
• Kedia S , Rajgopal S (2011) Do the SEC’s enforcement preferences affect corporate misconduct? J. Accounting Econom. 51(3):259–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein A , Li T , Zhang B (2020) Seeking out non-public information: Sell-side analysts and the Freedom of Information Act. Accounting Rev. 95(1):233–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Probes Reporter (2019) Accessed June 10, 2019, https://probesreporter.com/about-us .Google Scholar
• Rooney B (2010) Lawmakers curb SEC power to keep secrets. CNN (September 23), https://money.cnn.com/2010/09/23/news/economy/SEC_FOIA/?section=money_latest.Google Scholar
• Schapiro ML (2010) Legislative proposals to address concerns over the SEC’s new confidentiality provision. Congressional testimony. Accessed May 27, 2019, https://www.sec.gov/news/testimony/2010/ts091610mls.htm .Google Scholar
• Solomon DH , Soltes EF (2019) Is “not guilty” the same as “innocent”? Evidence from SEC financial fraud investigations. Working paper, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (2014) Division of enforcement. Accessed June 10, 2019, https://www.sec.gov/ .Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (2018) FOIA reference guide. Accessed February 28, 2019, https://www.sec.gov/Article/foia-reference-guide.html .Google Scholar
• Shumway T (1997) The delisting bias in CRSP data. J. Finance 52(1):327–340.Crossref, Google Scholar