Shareholder Litigation and Corporate Innovation

References

• Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, Hemous D (2012) The environment and directed technical change. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):131–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acharya V, Xu Z (2017) Financial dependence and innovation: The case of public vs. private firms. J. Financial Econom. 124(2):223–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acharya VV, Baghai RP, Subramanian KV (2013) Labor laws and innovation. J. Law Econom. 56:997–1037.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acharya VV, Baghai RP, Subramanian KV (2014) Wrongful discharge laws and innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 27:301–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Howitt PW (2008) The Economics of Growth (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Van Reenen J, Zingales L (2013) Innovation and institutional ownership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(1):277–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Harris C, Howitt P, Vickers J (2001) Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 68(3):467–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Appel I (2015) Governance by litigation. Working paper, Boston College, Boston.Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Graff Zivin JS, Manso G (2011) Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life sciences. RAND J. Econom. 42:527–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balsmeier B, Fleming L, Manso G (2017) Independent boards and innovation. J. Financial Econom. 123:536–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck T, Levine R, Levkov A (2010) Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States. J. Finance 65:1637–1667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein S (2015) Does going public affect innovation? J. Finance 70(4):1365–1403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J. Political Econom. 111:1043–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Bombardini M, Trebbi F (2014) Is it whom you know or what you know? An empirical assessment of the lobbying process. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(12):3885–3920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Block DJ, Radin SA, Maimone MJ (1993) Derivative litigation: Current law vs. the American Law Institute. Bus. Lawyer 48(4):1443–1483.Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Draca M, Van Reenen J (2016) Trade induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(1):87–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Griffith R, Van Reenen J (2002) Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979–1997. J. Public Econom. 85(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradley D, Kim I, Tian X (2017) Do unions affect innovation? Management Sci. 63(7):2049–2395.Link, Google Scholar
• Brandi TO (1993) Strike suit: A common problem of the derivative suit and the shareholder class action. Dickinson Law Rev. 98:355–400.Google Scholar
• Brav A, Jiang W, Ma S, Tian X (2018) How does hedge fund activism reshape corporate innovation? J. Financial Econom. 130(2):237–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JR, Martinsson G (2019) Does transparency stifle or facilitate innovation? Management Sci. 65(4):1455–1947.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown JR, Cookson JA, Heimer RZ (2017) Law and finance matter: Lessons from externally imposed courts. Rev. Financial Stud. 30(3):1019–1051.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JR, Fazzari SM, Petersen BC (2009) Financing innovation and growth: Cash flow, external equity, and the 1990s R&D boom. J. Finance 64(1):151–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JR, Martinsson G, Petersen BC (2013) Law, stock markets, and innovation. J. Finance 68:1517–1549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbidge JB, Magee L, Leslie Robb A (1988) Alternative transformations to handle extreme values of the dependent variable. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 83(401):123–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buxbaum RM (1980) Conflict-of-interests statutes and the need for a demand on directors in derivative actions. California Law Rev. 68:1122–1133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang X, Fu K, Low A, Zhang W (2015) Non-executive employee stock options and corporate innovation. J. Financial Econom. 115(1):168–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang X, Chen Y, Wang SQ, Zhang K, Zhang W (2019) Credit default swaps and corporate innovation. J. Financial Econom. 134(2):474–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chemmanur TJ, Loutskina E, Tian X (2014) Corporate venture capital, value creation, and innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(8):2434–2473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng CSA, Huang HH, Li Y, Lobo G (2010) Institutional monitoring through shareholder litigation. J. Financial Econom. 95(3):356–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu Y, Tian X, Wang W (2019) Corporate innovation along the supply chain. Management Sci. 65(6):2445–2945.Link, Google Scholar
• Cornaggia J, Mao Y, Tian X, Wolfe B (2015) Does banking competition affect innovation? J. Financial Econom. 115(1):189–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Acunto F (2015) Innovating to invest: The role of basic education. Working paper, Boston College, Boston.Google Scholar
• Davis KB Jr (2008) The forgotten derivative suit. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 61:387–451.Google Scholar
• Deng S, Willis RH, Xu L (2014) Shareholder litigation, reputational loss, and bank loan contracting. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 49:(4)1101–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamond DW (1989) Reputation acquisition in debt markets. J. PoliticalEconom. 97(4):828–862.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Djankov S, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2008) The law and economics of self-dealing. J. Financial Econom. 88:(3)430–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang VW, Tian X, Tice S (2014) Does stock liquidity enhance or impede firm innovation? J. Finance 69(5):2085–2125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris SP, Jandik T, Lawless RM, Makhija A (2007) Derivative lawsuits as a corporate governance mechanism: Empirical evidence on board changes surrounding filings. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 42(1):143–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fich EM, Shivdasani A (2007) Financial fraud, director reputation, and shareholder wealth. J. Financial Econom. 86(2):306–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischel DR, Bradley M (1985) Role of liability rules and the derivative suit in corporate law: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Cornell Law Rev. 71(2):261–297.Google Scholar
• Francis J, Philbrick D, Schipper K (1994) Shareholder litigation and corporate disclosures. J. Accounting Res. 32(2):137–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fulop JD (2007) Agency costs and the strike suit: Reducing frivolous litigation through empowerment of shareholders. J. Bus. Securities Law 7(2):213–231.Google Scholar
• Gompers P, Ishii J, Metrick A (2003) Corporate governance and equity prices. Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):107–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu Y, Mao CX, Tian X (2017) Banks’ interventions and firms’ innovation: Evidence from debt covenant violations. J. Law Econom. 60(4):637–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Hay M, Thomas DW, Craighead JL, Economides C, Rosenthal J (2014) Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs. Nature Biotechnology 32(1):40–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He JJ, Tian X (2013) The dark side of analyst coverage: The case of innovation. J. Financial Econom. 109(3):856–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He JJ, Tian X (2018) Finance and corporate innovation: A survey. Asia-Pacific. J. Financial Stud. 47(2):165–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B (1999) Managerial incentive problems: A dynamic perspective. Rev. Econ. Stud. 66(1):169–182.Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B (1989) Agency costs and innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 12(3):305–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Houston JF, Lin C, Xie W (2018) Shareholder protection and the cost of capital. J. Law Econom. 61(4):677–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu P-H, Tian X, Xu Y (2014) Financial development and innovation: Cross-country evidence. J. Financial Econom. 112(1):116–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC (1986) Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(2):323–329.Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson MF, Nelson KK, Pritchard AC (2007) Do the merits matter more? The impact of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. J. Law Econom. Organ. 23(3):627–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN, Zingales L (1997) Do investment–cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financial constraints? Quart. J. Econom. 112(1):159–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kinney TP (1994) Stockholder derivative suits: Demand and futility where the board fails to stop wrongdoers. Marquette Law Rev. 78(1):172–189.Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2006) What works in securities laws? J. Finance 61(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1997) Legal determinants of external finance. J. Finance 52(3):1131–1150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1998) Law and finance. J. Political Econom. 106(6):1113–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (2000) Investor protection and corporate governance. J. Financial Econom. 58:3–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (2009) The empirical impact of intellectual property rights on innovation: Puzzles and clues. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(2):343–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (2010) The litigation of financial innovations. J. Law Econom. 53(4):807–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Sorensen M, Strömberg P (2011) Private equity and long‐run investment: The case of innovation. J. Finance 66(2):445–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine R, Lin C, Wei L (2017) Insider trading and innovation. J. Law Econom. 60(4):749–800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin C, Officer MS, Zou H (2011) Directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and acquisition outcomes. J. Financial Econom. 102(3):507–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin C, Officer MS, Wang R, Zou H (2013) Directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and loan spreads. J. Financial Econom. 110(1):37–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manso G (2011) Motivating innovation. J. Finance 66:1823–1860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen MA (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(1):435–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinert AA (2014) Screening out innovation: The merits of meritless litigation. Indiana Law J. 89(3):1191–1237.Google Scholar
• Rhode DL (2004) Frivolous litigation and civil justice reform: Miscasting the problem, recasting the solution. Duke Law J. 54(2):447–483.Google Scholar
• Romano R (1987) The political economy of takeover statutes. Virginia Law Rev. 73(1):111–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romano R (1991) The shareholder suit: Litigation without foundation? J. Law Econom. Organ. 7(1):55–87.Google Scholar
• Scarlett AM (2011) Investors beware: Assessing shareholder derivative litigation in India and China. Univ. Pennsylvania J. Internat. Law 33(1):173–237.Google Scholar
• Seligman J (1994) The merits do matter: A comment on Professor Grundfest’s “Disimplying private rights of action under the federal securities laws: The commission’s authority.” Harvard Law Rev. 108(2):438–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stein JC (1988) Takeover threats and managerial myopia. J. Political Econom. 96(1):61–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stein JC (1989) Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporate behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 104(4):655–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swanson CB (1992) Juggling shareholder rights and strike suits in derivative litigation: The ALI drops the ball. Minnesota Law Rev. 77:1339–1392.Google Scholar
• Tian X, Wang TY (2011) Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(1):211–255.Crossref, Google Scholar