Waiting for the Payday? The Market for Startups and the Timing of Entrepreneurial Exit

References

• Allain ML, Henry E, Kyle M (2016) Competition and the efficiency of markets for technology. Management Sci. 62(4):1000–1019.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Fosfuri A (2005) Pricing diagnostic information. Management Sci. 51(7):1092–1100.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Cohen WM, Walsh JP (2016) The acquisition and commercialization of invention in American manufacturing: Incidence and impact. Res. Policy 45(6):1113–1128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Fosfuri A, Gambardella A (2001) Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A (2018a) The decline of science in corporate R&D. Strategic Management J. 39(1):3–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Fosfuri A, Rønde T (2018b) Waiting for the payday? The market for startups and the timing of entrepreneurial exit. NBER Working Paper No. 24350, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. National Bureau of Economic Research, ed. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 609–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Åstebro T, Serrano C (2015) Business partners: Complementary assets, financing, and invention commercialization. J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(2):228–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Silverman BS (2004) Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. J. Bus. Venturing 19(3):411–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benninga S, Helmantel M, Sarig O (2005) The timing of initial public offerings. J. Financial Econom. 75(1):115–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chemmanur TJ, Krishnan K, Nandy DK (2011) How does venture capital financing improve efficiency in private firms? A look beneath the surface. Rev. Financial Stud. 24(12):4037–4090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching K, Gans J, Stern S (2019) Control vs. execution: Endogenous appropriability and entrepreneurial strategy. Indust. Corporate Change 28(2):389–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Cape EG (1998) Disruptive technology a heartbeat away: Ecton, Inc. HBS Case 699-018, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Levinthal D (1989) Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Econom. J. 99(397):569–596.Google Scholar
• Cong LW (2019) Timing of auctions of real options. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print September 16, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3374.Link, Google Scholar
• Cunningham CM (2017) When novelty pays. Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
• Cunningham C, Ederer F, Ma S (2018) Killer acquisitions. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
• Daley B, Green B (2012) Waiting for news in the market for lemons. Econometrica 80(4):1433–1504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dolan R (2001) Abgenix and the XenoMouse. HBS Case 501-061, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Gage D (2012) The venture capital secret: 3 out of 4 start-ups fail. Wall Street Journal (September 20), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390443720204578004980476429190.Google Scholar
• Gans J, Stern S (2010) Is there a market for ideas? Indust. Corporate Change 19(3):805–837.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans J, Hsu D, Stern S (2002) When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND J. Econom. 33(4):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans J, Hsu D, Stern S (2008) The impact of uncertain intellectual property rights on the market for ideas: Evidence for patent grant delays. Management Sci. 54(5):982–997.Link, Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Stern S, Wu J (2019) Foundations of entrepreneurial strategy. Strategic Management J. 40(5):736–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gompers P, Lerner J (2001) The venture capital revolution. J. Econom. Perspect. 15(2):145–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graebner ME, Eisenhardt KM (2004) The seller’s side of the story: Acquisition as courtship and governance as syndicate in entrepreneurial firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(3):366–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graebner ME, Eisenhardt KM, Roundy P (2010) Success and failure in technology acquisitions: Lessons for buyers and sellers. Acad. Management Perspect. 24(3):73–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hegde D, Luo H (2018) Patent publication and the market for ideas. Management Sci. 64(2):652–672.Link, Google Scholar
• Hellmann TF, Thiele V (2019) Fostering entrepreneurship: Promoting founding or funding? Management Sci. 65(6):2502–2521.Link, Google Scholar
• Hsu D (2006) Venture capitalists and cooperative start-up commercialization strategy. Management Sci. 52(2):204–219.Link, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Mitchell W (2004) Innovating through acquisition and internal development: A quarter-century of boundary evolution at Johnson & Johnson. Long Range Planning 37(6):525–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna V (2010) Auction Theory, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, Burlington, MA).Google Scholar
• Luo H (2014) When to sell your idea: Theory and evidence from the movie industry. Management Sci. 60(12):3067–3086.Link, Google Scholar
• Myerson RP (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Nörback PJ, Persson L (2009) The organization of the innovation industry: Entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, and oligopolists. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 7(6):1261–1290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pástor L, Veronesi P (2005) Rational IPO waves. J. Finance 60(4):1713–1757.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ransbotham S, Mitra S (2010) Target age and the acquisition of innovation in high-technology industries. Management Sci. 56(11):2076–2093.Link, Google Scholar
• Rasmussen E, Mathisen MT (2016) Science-based entrepreneurial firms as real options: Assessing the outcomes of the Norwegian firm population from 1995 to 2012. Fini R, Grimaldi R, eds. Process Approach to Academic Entrepreneurship—Evidence from the Globe, The World Scientific Reference on Entrepreneurship, vol. 4 (World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ), 215–240.Google Scholar
• Riley JG, Samuelson WF (1981) Optimal auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(3):381–392.Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1990) Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Res. Policy 19(2):165–174.Crossref, Google Scholar