Vertical Contracts in a Supply Chain and the Bullwhip Effect
Published Online:15 Oct 2020https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3630
References
- (2013) Global value chains during the great trade collapse: A bullwhip effect? Beugelsdijk S , Brakman S , van Ees H , Garretsen H , eds. Firms in the International Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge MA), 277–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Strategic inventories in vertical contracts. Management Sci. 54(10):1792–1804.Link, Google Scholar
- (1999) Centralization of stocks: Retailers vs. manufacturer. Management Sci. 45(2):178–191.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Decentralized procurement in light of strategic inventories. Management Sci. 61(3):578–585.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) The benefits of decentralized decision-making in supply chains. INSEAD WP 79.Google Scholar
- (2005) Decentralized supply chains with competing retailers under demand uncertainty. Management Sci. 51(1):18–29.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Coordinating supply chains with simple pricing schemes: The role of vendor-managed inventories. Management Sci. 52(10):1483–1492.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Ownership coordination in a channel: Incentives, returns, and negotiations. Quant. Marketing Econom. 8(4):461–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Information transmission and the bullwhip effect: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. 58(5):860–875.Link, Google Scholar
- (1982) Durable goods monopolist. J. Political Econom. 90(2):314–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) The allocation of inventory risk in a supply chain: Push, pull, and advance-purchase discount contracts. Management Sci. 50(2):222–238.Link, Google Scholar
- (1999) Competitive and cooperative inventory policies in a two-stage supply chain. Management Sci. 45(7):936–953.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) In search of the bullwhip effect. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):457–479.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information. Management Sci. 46(3):436–443.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Supply chain coordination with multiple shipments: The optimal inventory subsidizing contracts. Oper. Res. 64(6):1320–1337.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Research note—The role of production lead time and demand uncertainty in marketing durable goods. Management Sci. 53(1):150–158.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Forward buying by retailers. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):90–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Storable good monopoly: The role of commitment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1706–1719.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Bus. Rev. 1(March-April):105–116.Google Scholar
- (1961) Industrial Dynamics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2005) An ARIMA supply chain model. Management Sci. 51(2):305–310.Link, Google Scholar
- (1967) An inequality satisfied by the expectation of the reciprocal of a random variable. Amer. Statist. 21(2):24–25.Google Scholar
- (1994) Barilla SpA (a). HBS Case9-694-046. Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
- (1968) The transmission of demand fluctuations through a distribution and production system, the TV-Set industry. Canadian J. Econom. 1(4):718–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Product quality in a distribution channel with inventory risk. Marketing Sci. 36(5):747–761.Link, Google Scholar
- (1987) Inventories and the volatility of production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 77(4):667–679.Google Scholar
- (1992) Why is production more volatile than sales? Theory and evidence on the stockout-avoidance motive for inventory-holding. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Vertical control of price and inventory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1840–1857.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Inventory dynamics and supply chain coordination. Management Sci. 56(1):141–147.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) The economic foundations of supply chain contracting. Foundations Trends Tech. Inform. Oper. Management 5(3–4):147–309.Google Scholar
- (1999) Decentralized multi-echelon supply chains: Incentives and information. Management Sci. 45(5):633–640.Link, Google Scholar
- (1997a) Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. 43(4):546–558.Link, Google Scholar
- (1997b) The bullwhip effect in supply chains. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 38(3):93–102.Google Scholar
- (2008) Promised lead-time contracts under asymmetric information. Oper. Res. 56(4):898–915.Link, Google Scholar
- (1996) Serial correlation in demand, backlogging and production volatility. Internat. Econom. Rev. 37(2):423–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Incentives through inventory control in supply chains. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 59(C):486–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Inventory and price behaviour. Rev. Econom. Stud. 49(1):137–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The implications of visibility on the use of strategic inventory in a supply chain. Management Sci. 65(4):1752–1767.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions. Euro. J. Oper. Res. 250(3):691–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) An analytical investigation of the bullwhip effect. Production Oper. Management 13(2):150–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Dynamic supplier contracts under asymmetric inventory information. Oper. Res. 58(5):1380–1397.Link, Google Scholar

